Dr. Norman F. Dixon, M.B.E. (Military Division, is a Reader in Psychology at University College London, and a fellow of the British Psychological Society. After 10 years commission in the Royal Engineers, during which time he was wounded ("largely through my own incompetence"), Dr. Dixon left the Army in 1950 and entered University where he obtained a first-class honors degree in Psychology. And he received the degrees of Doctor of Philosophy in 1956 and Doctor of science in 1972, and in 1974 was awarded the University of London Carpenter Medal "for work of exceptional distinction in Experimental Psychology". His previous book Subliminal Perception: the nature of our controversy was described by Professor George Westby "as one of the most substantial works of British psychology of recent years".

century ceremonially put the first consignment into a barrow and tipped it onto the stable dung pile).

The leaders of such armies were chosen from a corps of officers who were not recruited primarily for prowess or intelligence, but because they conformed to certain social criteria. They, for instance, had to be noble, or to profess a certain religion, or, where nobility was not a passport to rank, to belong to the appropriate class or caste. This is why successful generals when they emerge appear to be freaks or mavericks; and also, perhaps why such a maverick as Wellington found it necessary to convert himself into a British aristocrat in that course of his ascent to fame. It also accounts for the sudden appearance of a plethora of competent generals when the mould of a society is broken as it was by the French and Russian revolutions, or when a new, classless and caste-less society evolves, as it did in United States and the 19th-century. The best generals on both sides in the American Civil War could probably have beaten any comparable team from Europe, for the war made the professional of generalship a career open to talent and freed it from the rule of the authoritarians who flourish in rigid societies.

The "scientific" breakthrough really came in the early part of this century, and I would like to do well on this for a moment in spite of the fact that it lies in the province of applied science and engineering rather than that of behavioral sciences. "Science" was useful, but that there could be a "science" of war in the sense that scientific modes of thought could be used in strategic problems was incomprehensible. Navies remained rigidly authoritarian in outlook and hierarchical in structure, but at the same time our Royal Navy, for instance, was extraordinarily open-minded and imaginative in the purely technical field. The great battleships of 1914 had highly sophisticated systems of fire control, equipped, even, with a military analog computers; the importance of the submarine was grasped; and naval aviation pioneered. Unfortunately, on land in the First World War, the tactics of Malplaquet or Borodino were combined with the killing power of modern technology, with the bloodiest of results. This tragedy did not arise solely from incompetence: the march a science so for had provided weapons to kill but not the essential apparatus for command-and-control. Scientists were still only asked for tools. No one then dreamt of asking the question "How shall we do it?" -- to receive the teasing, or baffling, question in response "Why do you want to do

it at all?" Not until the Second World War did we see the birth of "operational analysis" and men of the quality of Lindermann, to Tizard and Blackett and, later on, in the 1960s, Zuckermann, brought in for the purpose of pure thinking.

The application of the behavioral sciences followed exactly the same cycle one-year later. "Psychology" was shrouded with myth and its application blocked by subconscious fears. It was confused with psychiatry, and psychiatrists were concerned with "mad" people and moreover, were soft on discipline. To allow them to participate in leader selection, asking awkward questions about sex, was repugnant to many officers and the resistance offered by military commanders to their use was naturally deep and obdurate. Only the insistence of the most enlightened men ever to occupy the post of the Adjutant-General of the British Army, General Sir Ronald Adam overcame these obstacles. Between 1939 and 1945 Army psychiatrists, and subsequently psychologists, made the most valuable contributions, quite outside a purely clinical field, to the question of training, officer selection, "job satisfaction" and discipline. Both the Royal Air Force and United States Air Force make good use of both branches of the science in the field of the effects of stress and motivation, which hitherto had been dominated by purely moral and unscientific assumptions. By the end of the Second World War we knew a great deal about the nature of leadership on the level of pilots and platoon commanders. But no one so far had the temerity to apply the same criteria to the General's, and this why I think Norman Dixon's book is by way of being a landmark.

He is a bold man. The subject of generalship is peculiarly the province of military historians of "classical" outlook, who are perfectly ready to fall on each other, let alone any outsider who may trespass therein, and also the new wave of social scientists and professors of international relationships and politics whose minds are not necessarily any more open than those of their military colleagues. Norman Dixon is therefore likely to come under a hot fire from several quarters. Fortunately, he's accustomed to heat. As a former regular officer in the Royal Engineers, including nine years in bomb disposal, he was moulded in the corps where intellectual habitually meets danger and he has exchanged his old discipline for new one to become an experimental psychologist. I cannot think of anyone better qualified to attempt this synthesis.

It must be emphasized that this book is neither yet another fashionable attack on British generals, nor one of those fascinating but immature exercises in arranging the heroes of the military pantheon in order of merit, as if picking a world class cricket team. Psychologists (he argues) can identify a distinct personality type in whom a fundamental conflict between the dictates of conscience and the need for aggression may seriously interfere with the open-mindedness, imagination and intellect needed to reach correct decisions. Obviously, the human personality is far too complex to be represented by a simple stereotype, but Norman Dixon's approach is to use the well-documented "authoritarian" personality as a template against which to measure some famous commanders.

In my view, at any rate, Norman Dixon's theme does not upset the "classical" appreciation of the characteristics of a successful general. Surely, he resolves the problem of conflicting qualities: ruthlessness and consideration, relentless pursuit of the aim and flexibility of approach, which so confuse the old-fashioned historian. He speaks in modern terms, of the "noise" with the general must filter out from the total input of information he receives in the stress and confusion of battle. But in classical terms, this is old and familiar to us; was it not once said of Massena that "his mental faculties redoubled amid the roar of cannon"?

I believe this book should be required reading at all places where future offices are selected, trained or prepared for higher command. Both professional Soldiers and the equally useful generation of young academic students of warfare will find new knowledge and valuable insights in this challenging study of how some men in high command may react when under the appalling stresses of war.

Shelford Bidwell

By now most people have become accustomed to, what might almost a blase' about, military incompetence. Like to common cold, flat feet or the British climate, it is accepted as a part of life--faintly ludicrous but quite unavoidable. Surely there can be nothing left to say about the subject?

In fact, military incompetence is a largely preventable, tragically expensive and quite absorbing segment of human behavior. It also follows certain laws. The first intimidation of this came to the writer during desultory reading about notorious military disasters. These moving, often horrific, accounts evoked a curious deja vu experience. For there was something about these apparently senseless goings-on which sent one's thought along new channels, making contact with phenomenon from quite other, hitherto, unrelated, contexts; and then back again to senseless facts, not now quite so senseless, until gradually a theme, continuous as a hairline crack, could be discerned throughout the stirring tales of daring do.

If this pattern was real, and meant what it seemed to mean, certain predictions would follow. These were tested and found correct. Yet other pieces began falling into place, until gradually the mosaic of elements took on the semblance of a theory. This book is about that theory. It is concerned with placing aspects of military behavior in the context of general psychological principles.

This sounds fine -- a cheerful marriage of history and psychology. Unfortunate, however, such a unit may not be entirely agreeable to

some of the potential in-laws. Judging from the attitude of some historians, a putting together of psychology and history is, to say the least, bad form, while a putting together of psychology and military history is positively indecent. There at least two reasons for this anxiety. The first is that since there are few things more annoying than having one's behavior explained, there exists a natural distaste for explanations of historical figures with whom one perhaps identifies.

The second reason is a distrust of reductionism -- of the idea that anything so complex as a military disaster could possibly be reduced to explanations in terms of the workings of the human mind, and this by a psychologist (of all people).

In answer one can only say that that of course historians know more about history than do psychologists. Of course historical events are determined by a complex set of variables -- political, economic, geographical, climatic and sociological. But ultimately history is made by human beings, and whatever other factors may have contributed to the military disaster, one of these was the minds of those who were there, and another the behavior to which these minds gave rise. Now these are complex variables; hence it has been necessary to play down the other factors in order to focus upon more clearly upon possible psychological determinants. Consider the analogous case of aircraft accidents. Nobody would deny that airplanes crash for number of different reasons, sometimes working independently, sometimes in unison; this is not mean that the selecting out for particular study a single factor, such as metal fatigue, necessitates dwelling on such other variables as bad weather, indifferent navigation, or too much alcohol in the bloodstream of the pilot.

The case for a reductionist approach, however, also rests upon another consideration: namely that the nature of military incompetence and those characteristics which distinguish competent from incompetent senior commanders have shown a significant lack of variation over the years, despite changes in the other factors which shape the course of history. Whether they are well-equipped are ill-equipped, whether they are in control of men were armed spears or men with tanks and rockets, whether they are English, Russian, German, Zulu, American, or French, good commanders remain pretty much the same. Likewise, bad commanders have much in common with each other.

One rewarding by-product of writing this book has been the many enjoyable conversations I have had with people in the armed services.

Here again, however, a very small minority viewed the enterprise with dismay, as something lacking in taste if not actually bordering on the sacrilegious.*

To this understandable sensitivity I can only say that no insult is intended. In point of fact, for devotees of the military to take exception to a study a military incompetence is as unjustified as it would be for admirers of teeth to complain about book on dental caries. In an imperfect world the activities of professional fighters are presumably as necessary to society as those of the police, prostitutes, sewage disposers and psychologists. It is just because we cannot do without these callings (except, possibly, the last) that any serious attempt to understand their peculiarities should be welcomed and, indeed taken, as a compliment. For it is a token of their importance that they should merit such attention. Moreover, it is only by contemplation of the incompetent that we can appreciate the difficulties and accomplishments of the competent. If there were no incompetent generals it might appear that the direction of armies and the waging of war were easy -- task well within the compass of all who had the good fortune to reach the highest levels of military organizations.

However, it is not only when contrasted with the inept that great commanders look their best, but also when seen in the context of the organizations to which they belong. The thesis will be developed that the possibility of incompetence springs in large measure from the unfortunate if unavoidable side effects of creating armies and navies. The most part these tend to produce a leveling down of human capability, at once encouraging to the mediocre but cramping to the gifted. Viewed in this light, those where performed brilliantly in the carrying of arms may be considered twice blessed, for they achieved success despite the stultifying bad features of the organization to which they happened to belong. This alone would seem to justify an unabashed excursion into the realms of military incompetence. But there are additional grounds, if anything more pressing. They concern the related issues of cost and probability.

While few would dispute that the cost grows exponentially with the growth of technology, so that the price of wrong decisions must now be reckoned in mega-deaths, the chance of military incompetence

___________________________________________

* It is fair to add that certain common characteristics of those civilians and servicemen who took the extreme view you provided a very useful clue as to the possible origins of military incompetence.

remains a matter for debate. We might hope that this would be a declining function of better education, more realistic values, greater fear of immeasurably worse consequences, and the decrease in jingoism. But there are strong grounds for taking the pessimistic view that the chance, like the cost, continues to increase with positive acceleration.

Several reasons may be advanced for this depressing hypothesis. Firstly, the gap between the capabilities of the human mind and intellectual demands of modern war for continues that expansion which started in the 18th century. It is probably opening from both sides. While modern war because its new becomes increasingly swift and deadly, and the means by which it is waged increasingly complex, the intellectual level of those entering the armed services as officers could well be on the wane. This tentative supposition is based on the fact that fewer and fewer of the young consider the military to be worthwhile career. One has only to look at contemporary recruiting advertisements to realize the evident difficulties of finding officer-material. They spare nothing in their efforts to convince an un-responsive youth. The services are depicted as glittering toy shops, where handsome young man enjoy themselves with tanks and missiles while basking in the respect of lower ranks hardly less godlike than themselves. In their eagerness to drum up applicants, these calls-to-arms attempt the mental contortion of presenting the services as a classless society in which officers nevertheless remain gentlemen. The clear implication of such expensive pleading can surely be only that the market for a military career is shrinking, to say the least. To meet this fall-off in officer recruitment insufficient has been done, in the writer's opinion, to improve the real as opposed to the advertised incentive-value of a military career.

Needless to say, perceived declining in the attractiveness of a military career may actually deter those who might otherwise have opted for one. According to Alexis de Tocqueville, this is particularly so in democratic armies during times of peace. "When a military spirit forsakes a people, but profession of arms immediately ceases to be held in honor, and military men fall to the lowest rank of public servants; they are little esteemed and no longer understood... Hence arises a circle of cause and consequence from which it is difficult to escape-- the best part of the nation shuns the military profession because that profession is not honored, and the profession is not honored because the best part of the nation has ceased to follow it"

In short, possibly less able people are being called upon to carry out a more difficult task with a heavier price to pay for error, and at the highest levels their responsibilities are staggering.

In the Vietnam War alone, military commanders responsible for executing policies which cost United States $300 billion dollars. They were responsible for releasing 13,000,000 tons of high explosives (more than six times the weight of bombs dropped by the USA in all theaters during the whole of the Second World War). They were responsible for the delivery of 90,000 tons of gas and herbicides. And they were responsible for the deaths of between 1 and 2 million people. These are great responsibilities. Errors of generalship on this scale would be very costly.

Of course many of the arguments put forward in this book or equally applicable to other human enterprises. Indeed, there is no reason to suppose incompetence occurs more frequently in military subculture than it does in politics, commerce or universities. There are, however, apart from the heavy cost of military disasters, special reasons for studying cases of military ineptitude.

The first is that military organizations may have a particular propensity for attracting a minority of individuals who might prove a menace at high levels of command, and the second is that the nature of militarism serves to accentuate those very traits which may ultimately prove disastrous. In theory, then, errors of generalship could be prevented by attention to these causes.

Thirdly, the public has, at least in the democracies, some real say as to who should make its political decisions. This control does not apply to generals. Even the worst government and the most inept prime minister, come up for possible dismissal every so often. This is not true of armies and navies. We may have governments we deserve but we sometimes had military minds which we did not.

Fourthly, if one of the main differences between military and political organizations is in the degree of public control, that between the military and commerce lies in decision pay-offs*. A wrong decision by company Chairman or Board of Directors may cost a great deal of money and depress a sizable population of shareholders but military errors have cost hundreds of thousands of lives and untold misery to civilians and Soldiers alike.

______________________________________

* As relatively trivial and unimportant are most academic decisions that it would be arrogant to discuss them in the same breath. But similar principles apply.

But the case for a study of military competence also rests upon other issues. Not the least of these is the need to examine a view of military behavior diametrically opposed to, though in its way no less extreme then, that of people who would vehemently defended senior commanders against even the faintest breath of criticism.

This other, hypocritical stance seems remarkably widespread. Thus, for many people with whom the author discussed the central topic of this book the notion of military incompetence struck an immediate and responsive chord. Rejoinders range from "You'll have no shortage of data" to "Surely that's the whole of military history!".

But when pressed for details there was a tendency to become vague, and retire behind a "1066 and all that" attitude to the subject. Psychological causes were usually reduced to a single factor: low intelligence or, as one historian has put it "the bloody fool theory" of military history. Doubtless this view has been contributed to by such recent books on military ineptitude as Alan Clark's The Donkeys, and abrasive critique of generals in the First World War. Certainly its title, taken from the famous conversation between Ludendorff and Hoffman* and such captions "Donkey decorates lion" (below a photograph of a general pinning a medal on a Lance Corporal) seemed to suggest an equation of incompetence with mulish stupidity. The contents of the book apply, however, that while stupidity may possibly have played a part, limited intelligence was not the cause of the behavior of which the generals have been criticized. Judging from the spate of books among which The Donkeys have appeared, it looked as if a taboo have been lifted on peering into the military wood shed. But mixing our rural metaphors, the erstwhile sacred cows were once more been transmogrified into nothing more than very on unsacred asses. Thus one historian has ascribed a series of military mishaps to "bone-headed" leadership², another spoke of "the long gallery of military imbecility"³, while a third has said of British Soldiers that "their fate was decided for them by idiots"⁴. The view taken here is that besides being unkind, these views are probably invalid.

The hypothesis of intellectual incapacity at leaves two questions quite unanswered. How, if they are so lacking in intelligence, do people

________________________________

* According to the memoirs of Field Marshal von Falkenhayn (cited by Alan Clark), Field Marshal von Ludendorff's comment "The English Soldiers fight like lions" was greeted by Major General Max Hoffman with, "True, but don't we know they are lions led by donkeys?"

become senior military commanders? And what is it about military organization is that they should attract, promote and ultimately tolerate those you performance at the highest levels may bring appropriate premium upon the organizations which they represent?"

To answer these questions, however, is first necessary discover what the Java General shall details, and how it could come to be done so badly or so well. This, the bare-bones of good and bad generalship, is examined in the next chapter in terms of information theory.

The main part of the book is divided into two halves. The first is concerned with case histories -- examples of military ineptitude over a period of some 100 years or so years. Much of this material will, no doubt, be all too familiar to the reader. Is included here, and the selections made, with two main purposes in mind -- to provide an aide-memoire, and because it is believed that the common denominators of military competence emerge most clearly when looked at in a longitudinal study. One special virtue of disparate approach is that it highlights the influence (or, more often, regrettable lack of influence) of earlier upon later advance.

The most part, cases of incompetence have been taken from British military history. Far from being unpatriotic, this apparently one-sided approach springs from a sentimental regard for the forces of the Crown, whose record of valor and fighting ability is second to none, and whose ability to rise above the most intense provocation, either from a civilian population, as in Northern Ireland today, or from the lapses of their top leadership in days gone by, most surely occupy a unique position in the history of warfare. Because it is exceptionally well documented, and has been going on for rather longer than most, British military endeavor also provides a particular useful datum for a comparative study. Finally, it is surely no more than a common courtesy that a critical analysis of one's own "beans" should take precedence over a listing of the other fellow's "motes".

The second half of the book is devoted discussion and explanation. It is subdivided into two parts, the first concerned with the social psychology a military organizations, and the second with the psychopathology of individual commanders.

The approach here is essentially eclectic. Drawing upon as the logical psychoanalytic and behaviorist theories, it tends to explain military ineptitude in the light of five inescapable, if unfortunate, features of human psychology. These are:

1. Man shares with lower animals certain powerful instincts.

2. Unlike lower animals, most men learn to control frustrate, direct and subliminate these instinctual energies.

3. While by far the largest part of this learning occurs in early childhood, its effects upon the adult personality or profound and long-lasting.

4. Residues of this early learning, and in particular unresolved conflict between infantile desires and the demands of punitive morality, may remain wholly unconscious yet provide a canker of inexhaustible anxiety.

5. When this anxiety becomes the driving force in life's endeavors, the fragile edifices of reason and competence are placed in jeopardy.

In due course we shall examine the scientific basis for these propositions and their relevance to a theory a military incompetence.

Because this is a book about incompetence rather than incompetence, about disasters rather than successes, these chapters may appear to take an unnecessarily jaundiced view of the military profession and to dwell more upon what is bad rather than what is good in man's attempts to professionalize violence. But without taking out and enlarging upon the less pleasant features a multifaceted phenomenon there could be no theory to account for those human aberrations which have cost so much unnecessary suffering in war. As Clausewitz wrote of war "this is the way in which the matter must be viewed, and it is to no purpose, it is even against ones better interest, to turn away from the considerations of the Bear the real nature of the Bear because the horror of its elements excites repugnance⁵. To the reader who recoils and discussed from these chapters I can only say that the theory they advance is based upon the emergence of a pattern, of which each small piece main cells seem trivial, possibly ludicrous, even noxious, but which, one put together with other pieces, he gives to make sense. This interdependence between the parts necessitated keeping an open mind, and, however much one may dislike or disbelieve the existence of individual trays, postponing judgment until the wood is seen in its entirety. The reader who is excessive trays, and thinks it history should be left historians, ideas about Soldiering the Soldiers, and the psychological theorizing should never go below the belt, this is the moment to stop reading and save yourself some irritation.

War is primarily concerned with two sorts of activity -- the delivering of energy in the communication of information. Most combatants are involved with the former, a few -- channels among them -- with the latter.

In war, Each side is get busy turning its wealth into energy which is then delivered, three, gratis and for nothing, to the other side. Such energy baby may be muscular, thermal, kinetic or chemical. Words are only possible because the recipients of this energy prepared to receive it and convert it into a useful form for their own economy. If, by means of said, say, impossibly large tunnels in gigantic reservoirs, they could capture in-store be energy forget them by the other side, the recipients of this unsolicited gift would be so rich, and the other side so poor, the future warfare would be a necessary for them and impossible for their opponents.

Unfortunate, such levels of technology of not been reached. In the Vietnam War the United States delivered to Indochina enough energy to displace three to 4,000,000,000 yards of current -- 10 times the amount dug out for the can now's of still is in Panama canal combined ¹

and enough raw materials in the shape of fuels, metals and other chemicals to keep several major industry supplied for years. In fact a part from a little slum clearance this abundance of energy was wasted -- consumed in the making of 26 million craters, the laying waste that 20,000 km² of force, and the destruction of enough crops to feed 2 million people for a year. However while the reception of energy still totally uncontrolled this is to certainly not true its direction and delivery. Indeed, these become a matter of some sophistication in the prime concern a military naval commanders: theirs is a job at the site now, a man and where to dispose of the energy which their sides make available they do this by occupying total points in the complex communications network.

In other words, but ideal senior commander may be viewed as a device for rate receiving, processing and transmitting information in a way which wheeled the maximum gain for the minimum cost. Whatever else maybe, he is part telephone exchange in part computer. These, the common denominators of generalship, are depicted in figure one. For those who don't relish flow diagrams let it suffice to say that on the basis of a vast conglomerate of facts to do with the enemy, his own side, geography, whether eccentric coupled with his low long-term store of past experience and specials knowledge, the senior commander makes decisions that, ideally, a chord with the directives with which he's been programmed.

Ideally. But these ideals are hard to me. For this there are two main reasons. First is a senior commanders often have to fail a number of incompatible roles. According to Maurice Janowitz these include ( rote leader, military manager and technocrats. It was to these we would add politician, public relations man, father figure and psychotherapist. The second reason for breakdown is what communication engineers call Middle East in the system noise is what interferes with the smooth flow of information. Is destructive power hinges on the fact is senior commanders, but any other device for processing information are channels ultimately capacity. If they want to deal with more information, built-in to take longer about it. If they don't take longer, it will make mistakes. Here we are using the term information in especial, and perhaps his most important, stands as that which reduces uncertainty. Let us expand this a little *

_________________________________

* in this discussion the concepts of information theory are used descriptively and somewhat loosely 2

Acquiring knowledge involves the reduction of ignorance through the acquisition of facts, but ignorance is rarely absolute and his reduction to rarely total. Pants reducing ignorance can be regarded as reducing uncertainty about a given state of affairs. It follows an unlikely unexpected fact contains more information ( i.e., reduces more uncertainty than one which is already expected. But unexpected fact is less readily absorbed than one which was expected. If this is less than crystal clear, consider the following example, Kasten suitably military context. The message in this case consists of an intelligence report which states: " enemy preparing for counterattack. It does onto DeSales strength, disposition, date and likely sector for attack.

Notice message, actually so simple, contains amounts of information which differ greatly from commander to Commander. To General Annie, who anticipated such counterattack, it conveys very little; it merely confirms a hypothesis which he had or he held. In fact says Theodore A. made extensive preparation for counterattack intelligence report when it came was largely redundant. In the case to General B., however, the same message was quite unexpected. So little had he anticipated and any counterattack that the news was charged with information. It reduced the great deal of ignorance and uncertainty. It gave him play to occupies mind and much to do.

Finally we have General C., for whom the message was so totally unexpected that he chose to ignore, with disastrous results. It conflicted with his preconceptions. It clash with his wishes. It contaminated, so we thought from an unreliable source. Since his mind was close to its reception, he found plenty of reasons refusing to believe it. What British Generals after the Battle of Cambrai, or American generals before the German counter-offensive in the Ardennes in 1944, he ignored it at his cost. Its information content was just too high for his channel of limited capacity.

One particularly hazardous aspect of the relationship between information and decision processes concerns the revising decisions. It seems that having gradually ( and rounds painfully accumulated information in support of the decision people become progressively more loath to accept contrary evidence. As Edwards and his colleagues have shown the greater the impact of the new information the more strenuously will it be resisted. Paris there are several reasons for this disastrous dangerous conservatism. Quotation new information has, by definition, high

informational content, and therefore firstly it will require greater process at processing capacity, secondly it threatens to return to an earlier state of knowing uncertainty, and thoroughly it confronts the decision maker with the nasty thought that he may have been wrong. No wonder he tends to turn a blind eye!

So much for a broad description of this most vital dimension of knowledge, it's prior in probability. This now returned to the other side of the coin, the problem over "noise." noise, as we saw is the enemy of information." noise takes up channel space and thereby distrust of load information. The more limited to channel capacity degraded the disrupting effects of noise. The more quotation are noise, the less information that can be handled.

A glance back at figure one suggested not only does a senior military commander receive more in his fair share of information, but the communication system of which he forms apart it securely susceptible to noise. This may be external and origin, ranging from static on a radio link to the delusions of Chief of Staff. Or it may be internal, ranging from such parochial sources as poor eyesight "s (a common feature of journals and occur Crimean war to such Central and usually more disastrous causes is defective memory, brain disease neurosis and all call holism.

"noise from all these sources may act upon the flow of information truly General's head and eventually in decisions of varying in gravity from the mildly in that to the utterly catastrophic the decision changed upon normally available information. They also depend upon payoffs -- the on the anticipated consequences of choosing one course of action rather than another. Payoffs may be positive or negative, beneficial or costly. The other criteria according to which decisions are made. Obviously, if the commander gets his criteria wrong --the possible loss of self-esteem or social approval, or fear of offending the superior authority, is given greater waking then more rational considerations --the scene is set for calamity.

The possibility of this happening is increased by the fact that the part of war, unlike the uncertainties which attached most vivid enterprises, extends not only to the input the most of the payoffs. The only does the general have to make decisions on the basis of a great volume of dubious information than be a program of perhaps questionable validity; he may also not know the costs and benefits of what he does propose. He's like a man who places a bet

without knowing the odds or where the booking might be found went at once the races over four.

As well as those problems which are inherent in any communication system, the human decision maker is the victim of another hazard -- namely that attention, perception, memory and thinking are all liable to distortion or bias by emotion and motivation. The potential for the state affairs depicted in figure two which shows the human operator represented by two interlocking feedback loops. This outline represents individuals interaction with his environment -- perception leading to response. The broken line represents an internal, the bat between needing six initiation. The latter asked upon the former. As needs arise, whether they be so sure biological, neurotic or adaptive, so the act upon the way a man perceives external world, what he tends to, the source of memories which he conjures up in the decisions which he makes.

He is like a computer which not only has to receive, store, process and deliver information but also has to post mostly, cope with hunger, resist the air, control anger, sublet makes Sachs and keep up with the challenges. What is considered that the capacity for perception in response, for memory and five, presumably of all the satisfaction needs, is a remarkable achievement that the best of times to keep these informational processes of mind free from bias by the needs which was they were originally designed to serve. In war such as an achievement borders on the miraculous and this for one very simple reason: the effects of needs upon cognition are maximized when the needs are very strong and external reality ambiguous or confused. It is under such conditions that neither the motion have the greatest freedom of maneuver, the greatest capacity for imposing themselves upon the uncertainties of thought. These are the conditions which obtained in war.

Contemplation of what is involved in generalship may well location surprise incompetence is not absolutely inevitable, anyone can do job at all. The early it this is this so when one considers that military decisions are often made under conditions of enormous stress, when actual noise, fatigue, lack of sweet, poor food in grinding responsibility at their clothes to the ever-present threat of total annihilation. Indeed, the foregoing analysis of generalship prompts the thought that it might be better to scrap generals Lee decision-making aspects of or to computers.

Figure 2: The Way in which individual preseason asked words is environment is partly determined by the quality and strength of his motives needs attitudes and emotions

a similar argument has been advancing connection with medicine. Widely diagnosis and therapeutic decisions develop a human brains when a computer could make them with far less chance of air? The answer, he is of course -- and this no doubt contributes much to the relief of journals and doctors -- the computers made poor leaders and in different father figures. They may be quick inefficient, un-pre-

prejudiced, sober and alert, but with all remain cold fish. They do not inspire affection, with its consequent desire to please, nor did he exude a bedside manner. Paradoxically they are also prof just to infallible. They are, moreover ( as far as we know, devoid of feelings and,. All our products of the same brain.

One last point. A senior military able commander does not indeed cannot, acting lowly isolation but is headed by the organization to which he belongs. He is like a computer or telephone exchange was modus operandi is based on rules which may have little relevance to the task it is called upon to form. Mention the telephone exchange that, for the honor of the post office, has to follow the rule but all telephones should have read here, 30 in. pots and heavily littered eyes, and one has some idea to restricting effects which an organization may have upon its own functioning.

Into chapters of follow leisure examined we shall be examining some well-known cases a military incompetence, to discover it possible to precise reasons for, and common denominator is up, these events. For the moment however, however, let us consider one brief and less well-known incident which is all straits how the smooth flow of information through the brains of senior commanders may be so distorted that their decisions prove catastrophic. The culprits, in this instance, are Naval, not military, commanders.

The place is Samoa and the date 1889. 57 warships -- three American, three German and one British -- are lying at anchor in the harbor of Apia. They are there as a naval a military presence to watch over the interests of the various governments in the political upheavals that are taking place ashore. Accordingly the anchor in what has been described as one of the most dangerous acreage is in the world, portico APO harbor at all is at best an unfortunate euphemism. Partly occupied by coral reefs, the saucer shaped indentation lies wide open to the north, once the great Pacific growers come sweeping in. It fair weather API provides an uneasy resting place

for no more than four medium-size ships. For seven large ships and numerous smaller craft, under adverse conditions it is adept trap.

This was a situation which the seven middle or witnessed the first bleak pork tents of an approaching typhoon. Even to landsmen are rapidly darkening sky and falling glass, the school lateness of wind, and then a lull, would boat deal. For some enable captains the signs were unmistakable. They knew they were in a regional the world materially subject to typhoons, which, in a matter of minutes, could lash the sea into a furious hell boiling water. They knew that such storms generate wins traveling at upwards 100 knots, Dusty could snap mass like carrots, reduced deck fittings to match wood and throw ships onto their been ends. They knew that it was the worst month of the year and they also knew that only three years before every shipping API had been sought by such a storm. In short, and in the terms of our flowchart, they're stored information coupled with present import wanted to only one decision; to get out and get out. And, as if this was not enough, the urgency of weighing anchor and putting to see was respectively suggested by subordinate officers.

But the captains of the ship were also naval officers and still they deny the undeniable and state where they were. Their behavior has been described as " and error of judgment that will forever remain at paradox in human psychology.

When the tycoon struck, its effects were tragic and then about inevitable. Without receipt room, their anchors dry into the pressure of mountainous seas, their holes and rigging crushed by the theory of the wind, three of the worships collided before being swept on to the jagged wreaths of coral. Another sank in deep water; two more were racked up on the beach. Of all the ships in the harbor of the only survivor was a British Corvette, which, thanks to its powerful engines and superb seamanship, squeaked through to the open sea.

Widely senior naval commanders, burst in the ways of the sea and provided with ample warning, this hazard their ships in the lives of their men? A superficial answer might be pride, or fear of appearing cowardly, or fear of criticism from their superiors. These are matters to be pursued in latter chapters. For the moment but apparently incurred verbal behavior of these men illustrates how decision processes can be thrown into disarray by noise of internal origin and how, in this instance anyway, incompetence cannot be attributed to ignorance or ordinary stupidity.

There must be few who would dispute the general tenor of the view "d above. While Field Marshal Montgomery concedes that there may be runners-up -- quotation part one of the most still managed campaigns in all recorded history one -- David Devine takes an even more extreme position "... The campaign plump levels of incompetence and never before tempted. One has a taste to challenge the Encyclopedia Britannica but is necessary to question the word " perhaps. To as the precise quotation part levels plum, the observer, commenting on victorious a day, is even more explicit. " the criterion more Kuts the Nadir of stupidity three.

Nadir or not, the criterion war certainly marching exceedingly low point in British military history. The poor quality of the officers most of whom had bought their commissions and for whom the standard of education was required, stood in marked contrast to the excellence of the men, describe a one observer as "the finest Soldiers I ever saw in stature, physique in appearance."

Amongst the officers are seen to be an inverse relationship between rank and efficiency. The more senior they were, but less competent the appeared. At the apex of this pyramid of mediocrity stood her and sees a rather sat, for he was always on his horse arenas chorus, and, being inordinately shy, rarely blocked amongst his men lowered raglan. His qualifications for leading a British expeditionary Force appeared to have been his age -- 67; his lineage -- he was youngest of the Duke of both for its a lettuce 11 sons; and his experience -- 25

here is as a military secretary to the Duke of Wellington, and then Master General of the ordinance. No one could accuse them of having online clutter by any previous experience of command, we had not -- not even although company. His appointment, however, was not wholly inappropriate, for all the end it was said: bridges quotation Mars is chief merit was that despite his incurable habit throughout the campaign of referring to the enemy as the " French, he was admirably adapted to lessen the friction in coalition wars. For in fact, raglan seem to agree with most French proposals: it was characteristic of the mandate he hated conflict!

At the next lower level where the members of Raglan's headquarters staff. Their rule it was to add impasse on such gems a military wisdom them as might be ordered by the commander-in-chief. On paper of this new test of noodles called Tate, as they were sometimes known, might have looked at Weldon it, closely integrated group, especially since five of them were blood relations of their Chief. Unfortunately, this nepotism was not based upon the possessing of any military expertise. Their contribution to the smooth running of the campaign seems to have been somewhat abrasive.

If Raglan and his staff can situated constituted the nerve center of the Army in the Crimea, this news comprise the field for supply of infantry and to Calvary divisions under commanders, who for the most part, did little to inspire confidence. Here to the problem was partly one of age. Apart from the 35-year-old Duke of Cambridge, cousin to the Queen, all the senior commanders were between 60 and 70, with Sir John for going, chief engineer, topping the list at 72! Certainly could be said of them to what they lacked inexperienced they made out for in years.

In the words of George Mott, a highly capable officer: "there is an old commander-in-chief, and old engineer, old brigadiers -- in fact everything old at the top. This makes everything sluggish in light of the events this was something of an understatement.

At says so often been the case, the next lower level of command did contain some leaders of vigor with a talent for war. Such a one was Sir Colin Campbell. His command unfortunately was no larger than the Brigade.

As usual in those days the cream of the Army was the Calvary, commanded in this instance by Lord Lucan, an impulsive man of moderate intellect and lacking in experience. Directly under Lucan, in

and charge of the heavy and light brigades respectively, were Jane's scarlet and lowered cardigan. The arrangement was not a happy one. Slight card again for position subservient to his brother-in-law who can was partly less solicit us in subordinate income model Goose to a snake. In terms of the concepts introduced in the previous chapter in mutual dislike which existed between these noble or the such as to constitute severe noise in any system of communication which involved paraffin. It was in fact a major factor in ad breakdown communications which resulted in what someone to regard as a single biggest blunder in military British military history -- the charge of the light Brigade and ballot clever.

The shortcomings of those administered the Crimean campaign were not winemaking themselves felt. The first into trouble came with their arrival on Russian soil. Even the gross incompetence of those responsible for the transportation and disembarkation of tubes are the Darden house expedition in 1996, or, 40 years later, those who carried out comparable arrangements during the Suez crisis ( on both occasions most urgently needed stores have been awfully packed at the bottom of the hole's can was as nothing decided that shown by the Crimean entourage: " note Army comparable to the British as in modern history ever landed upon Guangzhou or more in adequately equipped for invasion. Five the men were put ashore with no more than each could carry. They spent the first night without cancer blankets, soap to the skin by the incessant rain, their son waits by an AC win.

Such conditions compared unfavorably with those enjoyed by their allies, the French and the Turks, put excellent talents, medical supplies asker and transport. Considering produced in fitness. Maritime resource, sometimes extra part which what had suffice to carry what was needed, the contrast is as the more people as it was inexcusable.

For those who wish to ask go pay military command it might be about that these deficiencies could be laid at the door of a tightfisted treasury. But as one writer has put it;

In the ultimate resort a commander-in-chief had in his power

Asker one British army surgeon, with the backing of his commander, did in fact submit a report on the lack of medical supplies for a hospital was full of Colorado and diarrhea. His complaint, however, was just to be frivolous by General Cary, the new quartermaster General.

To force the government's hands by threat of resignation. No such threat came from Lord raccoon. When the other hand in any the that such manners were to liberally concealed from him in person its of the policy adopted by staff and cynically explained to Captain and die by taking up his appointment: " never trouble Lord Raglan with Morgan is as unnecessary with details, listen carefully to his remarks, try to anticipate his wishes and it all times make it as light as possible difficulties. " ⁶

This advice from a member of his staff reflects what was perhaps the prime characteristic of Lord Raglan: is almost compulsive known dissipation. Aristocratic, courteous in Duluth, he seems displaying many in the characteristics of the extreme in fervor. So taste distasteful was it have any direct contact with a snowman that he could hardly there to issue an order soon and he did so the Scouts in such a way as to insure a passable between his wishes and comprehension of those for whom it was intended. Components never appealing current courtesy, this India secrecy of rendered his hall upon the battlefield rather less effective than that of the regimental mascot. No skin first battle the campaign, that of the moment, he issued only one or -- to advance until the armor was crossed. The lack of further guidance might not have mattered had the generals under his command show some spark military ability. Unfortunately some did not, as if only excerpt from an account of the battle illustrates:

The polar -- " gentlemen short -- was not a general of distinction. The weight of his responsibilities for the left lack of the Army seems to have noticed faculties. Having let his brigade across the online with less difficult than Codrington because in this There were fewer obstacles, he seems to have been content to become applied with the command not to stop till across the river. About his next step he was so much in the dark beauty actually turned enlightenment to his youthful E. Decan, Henry Clifford, who advised in advance similar to Codrington's on the right. ⁷

Another passage from the same description of the battle exemplifies only too well the sort of effects that might be expected when the commander-in-chief refuses to take part. This time is a problem of consolidating and exporting a position again.

When the light divisions reached the great read now after their

exhausting and perilous attack it was inevitable that tension must relax... The moment that this is victorious troops were in the great redoubt, the controlling and directing land of the great commander-in-chief should have been evidence. Now should supports the arriving to reinforce the victors and fortify and inspire them against countermeasures. But as the wearied light divisions would `so nothing on a long slow bleeding up from the Homo but the dead and wounded lying like grass on the ground. As a glance to their finds the prospect was even more discouraging. To the right and left for mass columns of Russian Soldiers from whose ropes came along sorrowful wheeling sound, the ominous precursor to some desperate venture... It was the moment when there is are easily lost, and perception is pointed in credulity ranges uninhabited. A frantic figure of a staff officer on horseback, perhaps misled -- that at least is the most charitable explanation -- by the Russian failure to fire, can doubt that we galloping online the rank shouting, to fire! Don't fire -- the columns French!

To stop to ask themselves how the French could move to the British without a having been not happen hour earlier on the right flying, the how they came to be dressed in loan great overcoats reach into their ankles. If you want and dealer after another from left to right sounded the cease-fire followed by retreat. To Col. Chester of the 23rd this was insanity. " no, no, he shouted. " its a Russian column, fire! They were his last words and they went unseated eight

Despite the fact that Raglan, watching from afar, played little part in bringing about, oh was a victory for the Allies, thanks to the scourge disappear fighting qualities of Soldiers and their junior officers. Through one observer described as a " the great want of kinship, the victory was achieved with much unnecessary loss of life and, even worse, because all the other to follow it up, you the few if any dividends for the campaign as a whole. New,

There is one final point of some relevance to the thesis of this book. It concerns the matter of initiative. Lack of direction from from those at the apex of higher are kill authoritarian organization provides a special dilemma for those at lower levels in the chain of command. Confronted with an absence of clearcut orders, were they to do? If they take

The law into their own hands they run the risk of being accused of a subordination, particularly if they are plans happen to miscarry, but if they do not show initiative than they are equally likely to suffer for not having done so. At own love the field officers, for want of higher direction, use their own initiative considerable success. In so doing they saved the day if not the campaign. Scarcely, not one was mentioned in Raglan's dispatches. Is one thing to let your juniors do the thinking and take the risks but quite another to admit the fact.

Like a rudderless ship the balancing grapes from one reef to the next, the Army lurch from the hazards of Omar to the for more disastrous ones about laptop oh. Is touched on earlier, trouble started in dividing command between the two generals, Lord Lucan and Lord Cardigan. Individually neither was fitted to his post; together they were a disaster. Is one of their fellow officers wrote in his diary: "the more I see of Lord Lucan and Lord Cardigan a more thoroughly I despise them. Such crass ignorance in such overbearing temper".

Bragging to not excel in dealing with these men. Instead of law really supporting Lucan he appeared to condone even the most flagrant excesses of the recordable Cardigan. Among the key allow cardigan to bring his private yacht into ballot club, where for weeks it took off valuable space in the congested harbor, but he also permitted him to live on Port even while his brigade in division commander rocking ashore, on rations, under canvas. I forfeited his position of authority and exacerbating your he did or in many between his subordinates, Raglan's last a fair handling of these relatively minor matters so deceives of the ultimate disaster, the destruction of the light Brigade.

As said later, so much as been written about their ill-fated charged that it would be superfluous to recount the details here. There are however, several points exactly opposite to the subject matter of this book. Firstly, but weight was treated in subsequent counts did much to strengthen those very forms a tradition which puts such an incapacitated stranglehold holds stranglehold on military endeavor for the next 82 into the secure some crucial issues. For behind color and the glory, behind the valor and a dash, the charge

of the light Brigade was a blunder of monumental portions and an object lesson in what can happen when the promotional machinery of military organization is such as the troops at the mercy of men like Raglan, looking in cardigan.

He here in that teachers manifested into successive stages of the battle. For started immediately after the successful charge of the heavy Brigade under Honorable James Scarlet. Again it was a matter of feeling to exploit a position again.

To grasp out incomplete was Scarlet his willingness occur necessary to ask one question: what was the light Brigade doing when the Russian Calgary wheeled out of the North Valley and passing right across its front, went down to engage the heavies? Not 500 yd. Separate cardigans man from light costs. Every moment the gallery expected this incomparable chance of architect be ceased. To the Dallas the brains are soon to know whether possible course for this bright, -- and eager Brigade to take. But to the amazement of the spectators in the theory of the Brigade nothing of the time was attempted. No

The explanation of this curious laps hinges upon the fact Lucas Lucan had impressed upon cardigan that his job was to stay put it up in the position, attacking only such enemy forces us can within reach. Under the circumstances cardigan determined that he could not give his brother-in-law the slightest ground for making a complaint to detect it. If it did, they Lucan should take the blame. The content words and the position and to think he lived, even if the cost of his life.

However, this missed opportunity, which might have sealed the Russian space, receives the unimportance when compared with what happened next.

It seems that the charge of the light Brigade, in which only 15% of the original forces 673 rollback, was the end result of faulty communication between five men calling Raglan, his quartermaster General area, Lord's Lucan and cardigan, engine picture was Captain Nolan. Can Raglan's contribution was issued words the press ice meaning of which was has remained a matter for debate*. The fourth and more disasters of these orders air he wrote out a flimsy

* third or copy, a copy of which was retained by racking, read quotation more Calgary to advance in take advantage of any opportunity to recover the heights. They will be supported by the imagery which have been order to advance on two fronts. But by the time it reached looked in the final words had been changed to petition Martin they will be supported by the infantry which have been ordered. Advance on two fronts. The fourth quarter Rand petition were Lord Raglin languishes account rate advance rapidly to the front -- all the enemy and try to prevent the enemy carrying way the guns. Imports artillery may accompany.

French cow is on your lap.immediate.

S. G. D arry 11.

42

Piece of paper. In so doing meaning intent to unravel the main enigma was by the words of his master. Which front what? 1 tn.? In its new written form the order was then passed to the unbalanced Captain Nolan, who know is both Lucan and cardigan. This glittering young officer of the St. Paul stars, who made up in arrogance which lacked in Ypres passes the, deliver the order to Lord looking. Lucan, whose comprehension of raccoons bushes used to have been minimal but who was not going to do meaning so I engine words with Nolan, compete misinterpretation of the order to cardigan. Cardigan, to give him his do, realize that he was being asked charged the Russian guns down the valley went by enemy artillery, express considerable astonishment at what would so evidently be compete rise for his Brigade. Once again communication foundered on the rocks of mutual dislike, pride and jealousy.

June, and then overtaking, by the era press of no income cardigan greatest Brigade into the jobs of death.

As is usually the case after initial disaster of such proportions, the final stages sorry tale concerns the portioning of Maine -- the means that would society obtains a modicum of revenge for the wrong is suffered, the species its own guilt processed responsibility as it may have had for the event in question, and finally seeks to prevent repetition of the disaster. These and the last soon anyway in nobly, for this only lasted the disaster can be turned good account.

Is a sad feature of authoritarian organizations that their nature in inevitably need locates against the possibility of learning from experience to the portioning of playing. The reason is not hard to find. Since authoritarianism isn't sell the product of psychological defenses, authoritarian organizations are past masters at collecting blame. They do so by denial, a rationalization, by making scapegoats, or by some mixture three. However it is achieved, the net result is that

In real mission the failure or incompetence is ever made by those were really responsible; you can be done about preventing every conference. In this instance, as in many others to be considered presently, scapegoat down. One of these was Captain Nolan, an easy choice since yet, very considerately, he allowed himself to be killed.

If all is remarkable for a positive orders, and clap of further confuse nature, and anchorman, then into battle in the campaign, has the distinction of being bought into law without any direction at all. One die risk, announcer, wrote: petition or no orders were given from first to last but to advance. No attempts to reform shattered the Times, Japan of operations. The same writer, a certain major part to load, said: " I feel gratitude to the courageous British Soldier thought all day, the punishing his ammunition from his wounded comrade's pouch without direction or hidden superior story, and the example of this officer who was left equally without guidance, not to the generals in my opinion and not distinguish themselves. ¹²

Clearly such opinions make a mockery of the dispatches and later the honors what's succeeded the battles. And chain the baton Field Marshal, and to staff, whether or not they had been within range of Russian guns, a stuck in prep rank.

However, occur meaning mismanagement receipts topology, not in the battles of are considered, putting into which followed them. Despite the fact that between October 1854 in April 1855 there was no fighting whatsoever, writings Army suffered a 35% decline is active strike. This loss was due to total disregard for the Army's physical welfare, in refusal to ameliorate called in of Russian winner. Men had a call or Common of exposure, of malnutrition. The documentary didn't come obscurity, gangrene and dysentery. Is an insurgent observed earlier losses about how and location where we now bury three times the number of them in every week and think nothing of it!

The time because there is no issue peel and stores.

Now, on logical if not humanitarian grounds, it would seem inescapable fact that General's prime responsibility is welfare of his men. All his skills as leader and military planner will avail him nothing if, for one reason or another, there is no one left to fight. Assuming, then, that the physical and mental welfare troops into

sine qua non of successful military endeavor, how did it happened at the British Army in the Crimean campaign was virtually destroyed by something other than the enemy"?

Several reasons may be given. Firstly, there was that unrealistic overconfidence in rapid victory which stacked rice so many military adventures. As we shall see, it was a notable feature of the poor war, of the first world war, of the second world war and eating, through what was by now a quite extraordinary incapacity to profit from experience, of the Suez crisis and they have pigs be asking. In the present context Lord raccoon was so confident that's the basketball would fall before the near of 1854 nope Antonin made to house and maintain his Army in high ground above town. Now you want to send gifts in the waging of the three preceding battles to cloning such childlike innocence to the mid-of speech success against that will inferior Russians is remarkable, to say the least.

Secondly, after he the wrong, Brandon and his staff, unlike the French, who managed to improvise callable conditions, seems incapable of adapting to the circumstances thrust upon them. This inertia and inflexibility were routed partly in ignorance(thus no one seems to have had the remotest idea House how to how coal he could get during a Crimean winter, partly in red tape, and partly in refusal to admit that things were not as they should be.

The shortcomings of the high commander particularly well a little illustrated in connection with the fuel prices. According to one writer: ( condition or what killed more men than Russian boats, what made life miserable, but sent me in the hundreds to hospital tent were the grave -- they were frequently synonymous -- was the want of firewood. Without it not only were men never worn, not only could they never cook their rationale petition marked cold grinder that they were never draw. One of Raglan score was wrote petition marked the go down to the transplant, combat wet, going to hospital's wet, died next the same night and are buried in their wet point its next morning. And an army surgeon wrote: " I never thought this human subject would endure so much preparation and suffering. Even a distant remove these accounts are deeply moving in the scenes they conjure a painful to contemplate. But, content worry though they are, these tragic statements reject the real in Normandy, namely that the shortage of firewood could have been easily rectified.

Just across the Black Sea Lake Forest of Anatoly I. A little foresight, a proper leadership, and iota of compassion, and two or three ships

Could have brought back in a firewood to last everyone in his room very but there was none, and they did not. Instead, may soak to the skin, and dropping with fatigue from long hours and trenches, had infrared age fought in white for meager sticks of brushwood and, when this failed, grow about their son roots.

This inclination to take even the simplest step is to mitigate the hardships of the troops were seeking thereby have any assistance from elsewhere was no less apparent when it came to the matter of sleeping accommodation. The most part this consisted of wet blankets and mud. By January 1855 even the blankets and acquired said survival by the day could no longer be spared for shrouds. The court to wrote: per " they bury our men quite naked and throw him into the grave like a dog. I wonder what the people in one would think of bases were to see it.

The chief engineer, Sir John per going, suggested the Turks, that nation of carpenters, should be asked to make floorboards were the tents. Any difficulty Raglan might have met with in arranging this would have been speedily resolved by our ambassador in Constantinople. But suggestion, which might have saved thousands of lives was ignored. Even in the so-called hospital tents petition marked men lay on the bear grass and died.

There were other areas of appalling neglect. Including close laughing as is to say:

In the Crimea, as elsewhere before and after, the Soldiers suffered from poor food and poor clothing. The clothing was good enough for parades in Britain, lamentable for Field service. Some units do not even possess great coats and suffered terribly from the intense coal. Machine gun rags and patterns within a few months. I should was literally rotten and some in other ways not yet to be even. All catering system was inept and inadequate and was even worse in the hospitals than in the camps. ¹³

For a educating for reform in attempting to ameliorate the effects of these deficiencies, the military high command did their best to preserve the status quo. In the treatment of Florence Nightingale and her zealous helper, the London chef Alexis so year, the relatively well fed Jennings betrayed a lack of compassion it was scarcely credible. With his army dying of malnutrition, General

Ire set of Sawyer and his new cooking stove: "Soldiers don't require such good messes as these while campaigning. You will improve the cook to spoil the Soldier." ¹⁴

It men who survived all not an increment, and even the charged that clout, when our dying of thousands through the gross incompetence of their own the Corps staff greedy something of a vicious circle, and with every death there were fewer left to construct them in the trenches. But there were other vicious circle. Now Raglan and his staff enjoyed comfortable beds and well-cooked food, the rapidly reducing labor force not only and the work for longer hours but even suffered more serious malnutrition been hitherto. This is because the combination of fatigue, damp and coal costs are going to become so inflamed the day could not eat their standby, the biscuit. As a result, for lack of nursing, they became even less capable or assisting the coal. By the end of January to British Army could muster only 11,000 men, it's sick and wounded totaling 23,000.

Eventually, after winter of terrible privatization, Raglan's army came to the last battles award -- those of the Redan. They involved the storming and capture of a fortress on the outskirts of Sebastipole.

If it seems that little had been learned. Begin there was gross underestimation of the enemy's ability. Indeed, the forthcoming engagement with garden with such equanimity they attracted a large assembly of sites years. While the band of the rival brigade played like music, and not in some officers wives, traveling gentlemen, and even a number of serving Soldiers, took a position on the surrounding hills.

Raglan, with as my enclosed all the gun before and enduring overconfidence in his army, chose only 400 of us 25,000 men for the first stage of the battle: the occupation some quarries, from which the assault on the redan would be mounted. This proud economy and manpower was dispersing state. They occupy the quarries that considerable an unnecessary cost -- more than half the attacking force, including a number of junior officers. That the in fact, but whole affair nearly ended in disaster. Staff work at been poor, with orders confuse and often contradicted Tori. Raglan staff and miscalculated destroy you took occupy the quarries and to repel car attacks. Reserves at been inadequate, and unavailable when most needed. The plot had been given to selecting the

troops to be used very the proportion of veterans was low. Many of the officers, although unquestionably brave, or young and inexperienced.

About it was with the second stage in the battle, the main assault, the pins and really wrong. Begin Raglan and other high-ranking officers on the estimated the industry and overestimate the effects of the artillery bombardment meant with which he proceeded attack -- nor did he appreciate that between the bombardment of the Russian for an add-on attack, forced upon them by the right French commander, you would be well able to repair their defenses and recite their guns.

The in theory, the attack was to consist of three pronged charge, the solution the left, right in center of the British front converging on any position. In very, the sudden synchronize assault from three side to sweep away all opposition. In theory, the Russian artillery would have been obliterated by the preceding bombardment. And, in theory, the Russian British latter parties would have no difficulty in porting the 18th loads across the 450 yd. Of rising ground to the walls of regain. In practice, things went rather differently. Firstar, the general in charge of one of the three assault parties mistook the starting signal and dispatches men happen hour to early. Even without this mistake, any possibility of a concerted simultaneous assault was rolled out because no one had arranged in the means whereby the attackers could rise from their trenches in unison. There's nothing for them to stand on. At the best they came out and once in twos. Under the circumstances it was hardly surprising to the great volume of fire from the obliterated rushing guns brought the British attack to very bloody hall. It was at this moment, just when it was most needed, but Raglan's artillery received an order cease-fire. It was his last wonder which transformed an aborted attack into a massacre. No longer intimidated, any muskets toward a hail of lead in that Raglan stricken Army. The latter parties moving like snails bequeathed beneath their loads and mowing down as the struggle to slow.

I wish and thus into diverse battle for the regain -- until then the most disastrous of the war. Bradleys army have no illusions as to the incompetence of their general and his staff. Staff officer rode quotation are we had been told from headquarters another high authority that success was certain; the arrangements with plan of attack were so perfect they must succeed; and put to test it turned out to be so

Extra bleed bad that failure was inevitable. Others describe the battle as quotation Martin is managed, quotation Martin botched, quotation Martin bungled, quotation Martin people and ill conducted, quotation Martin bad business, " a bundling disgraceful childish failure.

Later lowered walls lead rode: " upon this occasion what we asked from them was beyond the power of men to give. Our plan to detect was simply EDI and was bound to fail. Another writer has this to say " not only was the discretion of defensive tactics. At headquarters there was not merely ignorance but entire lack of person at the city. How is it possible to Raglan in those about him, knowing is it on by this time the remarkable Russian ability to repair damage overnight, the bleed 2000 Soldiers would be able to advance over Shell swept places to were 50 yd. In length, thread their way through an undestroyed Abbott see, prostitutes 20 ft. wide and then a sale in this apartment all about preliminary bombardment? 15 how winch!

For the student of psychosomatic disease the aftermath of the battle is not without significance. Neatly falling to defeat raccoon was seen to age visibly. Within a few days he'd contracted Colorado and before 10 days he'd passed you instead. Two of his generals were similarly stricken. Bradleys the mines had little to the impression of the Army. Had they known that his replacement would be 63-year-old General Simpson their grief might have been rather more acute.

It was not that Simpson was a harsh taskmaster. On the contrary he was a gentle man but a very mediocre ability. He was as devoid of usable experience has been his predecessors. His methods rather simple or windows of raccoons. Presumably to avoid giving a wrong were he'd no orders at all and he devise knowing. In the words of one observer he cannot command Army. On the day of his promotion discredit was saying: they must be indeed hard out when they appointed an old man might mean ¹⁶

In fact the government was not so hard out the day had no action in trust the Army to the Scout reading all general. A far better choice would have been the energetic and outspoken Sir: Campbell, Amanda considerable ability and wide experience. The Campbell was a maverick and as such unpopular with the military establishment. He also came from a relatively humble backroom.*

Under Simpson was wavering in ineffectual hand the second battle

__________________________

* it was another two years before Campbell became commander-in-chief in painful, during the Indian mutiny.

For the day and, the last battle the war, the even more disastrous to the first. Once again a massive compartment was followed by a frontal assault across a heavily defended triangle of ground white by rushing guns. But this time the troops were younger and greener, despite all the training in the prey grounds of Aldershot less inclined to the dollar the discretion. Having sustained 2,447 casualties in two hours of fighting, it turned tailing lead, thus adding humiliation to defeat. The fault lay with their commander, whose planning, in the words of lowered walls lead, was as faulty in every detail as it was pure trial in conception.

As an example protected military incompetence of high levels of command the Crimean war is not, unfortunately, unique. It was however, the prototype for subsequent ineptitude. The small in number in comparison with those of latter words, the 18,000 who died of their only time the demise to an in admixture of poor planning, unclear worse, lack of intelligence ( in both senses of the word and fatal acquiescence to social pressures on the part of their commander. The died because they were mismanagement man whose positions in the military hierarchy of less of their ability to into their wealth, their place in society, with a reputation for fitting and. The died because Soldiers were too readily regarded as expendable objects.

The Crimean war was bought at a time the greatest prosperity this country had ever known, when British efficiency, inventiveness and sheer entrepreneurial vigor in no pounds. Why then was at fossil badly?... So badly that the casual observer might have been forgiven for thinking that, at some level, we do not really want to win which? Of course there are some obvious immediate and reasons. Governmental stinginess clearly paid apart, as the deliberate policy on trusting military matters to an aristocratic, rich, but essentially amateur, delete: this on the grounds of such a class would have neither the motivation class, nor indeed the skill, to turn upon the state.

But this is only to touch the service of the problem. Such resisting unexplained passivity and non-participation, the monumental errors of judgment, the ludicrous appointments, the paralytic inability to improvise or innovate. The do not explain staggering and ultimately soap destroying wastage manpower, which seems to have its words in a curiously detached attitude towards human suffering.

Timing begin unexplained the even greater depth of incompetence shown on this occasion by the enemy, of whom is been said: quotation Martin the Russians, with more men in the field and immense potential reserves, were even bigger monitors than their invaders, and seen to move in the day dream of battle. ¹⁷

And what of the man who led the Crimean Army -- field and yet courteous Raglan? Christopher Hibbert, was written the most sympathetic of biographies and defensive Raglan, makes three-point switch as we shall see and considerable significance a very advanced later in this book. Firstly, Raglan had " and emotional antipathy toward the use of supplies. Secondly, he nursed an intense dislike of the brass and shun publicity. Thirdly he lacked enthusiasm for intellectual pursuits.

He cared little to the changing world outside it bracket the Army bracket. Science and math and the mechanics, which were beginning are ready to change the whole life of your, meant nothing to him. Nor did painting, nor music; nor did books. In fact in the great mass of his personal correspondence only wants to see mention having read one. It was the count on Monte Crist. " so far as some I have got in it he said he confessed, " I find it is tiresome -- very poisonous ¹⁸

The most extraordinary thing about the events of the poor war was that they could have occurred not only after those of the Crimean war, but also after those of the first Boer war of 1880-1881.

In terms of psychological jargon the poor war showed very little evidence of positive transfer ( positive transfer being nearly what happens when something learned in one situation is utilize successfully in some subsequent, similar situation ( and this was odd because there were many striking similarities between it and the Crimean war. Among most actions of the Victorian army, both were against white racists. Both were wage far from home, in what were, to say the least, trying climates -- to cold in one sense, too hot in the other. The work, however, too great differences, and it was the East which were larger responsible for depths of military incompetence on the British side that stretch credulity to the breaking point.

The first difference was one of the available technology banks to maximizing the Maxim's intervention of an efficient machine gun and 1880s and Armstrong's production a breech loading rifle field guns, Soldiers at the time in the poor war could read disease in theory anyway the ( kill each other in large larger numbers with greater accuracy and over much longer distances than ever before. Their transition from the old smooth bore quotation R. Brown passes (later replaced by Minnie rifles) of the Crimean war to the high-powered, rapid-fire in rifles, using smokeless powder, there were available by 1890 constitute what is probably the single greatest advance and firepower since the invention of gunpowder.

The second difference was in the nature of the adversary. While not

52

Russians it's best to poll had been resolute and courageous fighters, the day, like the British troops, or regimented in discipline to act in unison without opportunity for thought or personal initiative. The oars, however, were a very different proposition -- in their motivation, style of fighting and expertise,. As one observer Mark, the poor army consisted of 35,000 channels, each combatants his own master defending his homeland. There also good marksman, each old horseman, and determine members of a flexible, knowledgeable guerrilla force.

These two differences between the worst would not have mattered had those who ran the British Army managed to keep up with the times in their thinking, and shaken off habits acquired over the preceding 500 years. This they seemed unable to do. For star, commerce for still too busy being showman, in her out a gorgeous uniforms, that they had little time for their men and a total absence of concern for the latter's welfare. Even as late as 1902, according to Sir of Lynnwood, commanding officers in the Southern command did not even though the whereabouts of the Soldiers to trains, much less their condition. It was this attitude of buying, in conjunction with climatic conditions, the The fact that out of 22,000 British Dead 16,000 died of disease.

Progress in adopting new military techniques were also conspicuous by its absence. One of the outbreak of war train maneuvers are characterized by disregard for new weapons. The accident was on solid line formations, mechanical precision, rigid dependence on order, fire strictly in volleys at a word of command. ¹

The position as regards artillery was little better. According to one writer: " the artillery doctrine of the time was older than guns, older almost in the Crimean. The artillery gallop smartly into action, on limiting the open ( for it had no notion of indirect fire, and opened fire over primitive sites with no vestige of a gun shield to protect its cruise. ²

Considering its inadequate handling in the Crimean war, one might have expected that the high command would try to rehabilitate itself with a vigorous training program during the ensuing years of peace. Eminently it did not. According to Krueger: " only two months a year were spent training. The rest a man was parading. ³

As for new in mentions, the war office was sporting rather than pragmatic machine guns like the Maxim, which in its modified

Before making the Vickers of the First World War, he would you will not as suitable only for the destruction of savages and hardly suitable for use against white men.

It was in decisions of the Seward the general showed a curious you lot technology. On the one hand the color of the poor Soldiers elevate them from the level of savages, thereby saving their white skins from exposure to machine guns, but any other they were regarded, in terms of their the military expertise, as no better than savages. Of all the factors which contributed to the succession of disasters which mark the war this underestimation of the enemy was perhaps most important. Largely because they issued any form of Senatorial elegance and preferred the wearing of civilian attire, dark clothes and floppy hats to the source of uniforms affected by the British, the oars were dubbed the raffle of illiterate peasants in their army utterly ludicrous. In reality, as events would approve, it was the British not the worst to despite their smart appearance showed up in a power from satisfactory light.

The Soldiers themselves not to blame; they were victims of the system. As Pemberton points out: " so far as British politicians were concerned, in might also be said the greater the inefficiency of the Army ( except on parades and on annual military tournaments ( the greater there contentment. For according to the same writer: " or as was an army of amateurs; for officers a congenial club. " inside of keenness or desire for self-improvement in military matters was frowned on as not good form. Those who signified a wish to taste of college were likely to be told: ( petition mark isn't the Regiment good enough? Poll and highly symbolic support opaque sticking worthy plotted occupations and any sort of the work quite beyond the pale.

So sort of the channels by the equation in which they made between military appearance in fighting efficiency that their contempt for the worst was matched only by the neglect of most ordinary training exercises for their own man. As Lord Roberts was to mark the men were not train the user eyes are estimated distance; his opinion for too much attention is given to order any regularity and for too little to developing individuality. One further and related factor which played British military thinking then, as at other times, was the Tendancy to quite warm sport. Notion that certain accident not " cricket was carried to such absurd lengths that the

Trooper was given no training in the cowardly art of building defensive positions warhead cover.

To this mixture potentially disastrous attitudes was added one other -- a self-righteous indignation towards the other side. This came to the four and it was discovered the British methods of running the war fell short of those practiced by the boards. As Lord Kissinger said: " the oars are not like the Sudanese who stood up to a fair fight. There always running away on their little ponies... There are a good many foreigners among the boards but they are easily shot as they do not stomach about like the poor is themselves. "s a fair fight was evidently won in which primitive tribesmen of ( from a poor country ( by standing the ground obligingly presented in easy target for the Soldiers of what was then the richest nation on earth. By the same ~, disengagement in an action against superior numbers, in order to fight began another day, was deemed cowardly and a poor show.

This den was the background of attitudes and expertise which the British Army brought to the Boer war. Any residual doubts about its unfitness for the expedition tend to dissipate one considers the behavior of the channels put in charge.

Buller

The leading character was the commander-in-chief, general servant of adverse color. According to contemporary description there could be no finer shores for our South African adventure: " there is no stronger commander in the British Army Minister Moe, almost grimly resolute, completely independent, utterly fearless, steadfast in vigorous men. Big bone, square job, strong-minded, strong headed... Smartness... Sagas city... Administrative capacity... This point be a Soldier of the very best English type, needless to say the best type of all. ⁵

Unfortunately this assessment was at variance with the facts in all but two particulars. Firstly, he was indeed big. Secondly, until sadly lacking in moral Kurdish, he was undoubtedly brave when it came to physical danger. In this respect, as in many others he was not unlike Raglan of the criterion war, and indeed some other commanders of subsequent years.

All the third reverse Buller, as the team to be known by his troops, Green Krueger writes: " at the risk of morning of the contemporary description... It should be mentioned that his big bones were particularly well covered, especially in the region of the stomach, and

This square job was not especially Perry above the double chin. Yet in the Army with no disadvantage, his mother being a Howard in Nice of the Duke of no, and he was very wealthy, which was fortunate in view of his preference for a diet of ample good food in Champaign. ⁶

Krueger attest to his bravery. " his record was something to conjure with. Since the age of 21 heap upon five campaigns, including the zoo land wars when he was the dashing leader of the regular Calvary. The winner of the Victoria cross, he had such a reputation in the many people thought he and not wolves to should have been head of the British Army. ⁷

Never has a nation been more wrongheaded in the selection of a general. Never has a general been more disastrous in the execution of his duties. Like Ragland, Buller had no experience the commanding a large body men. The previous decades detailed number of different posts in the war office. According to contemporary counselors the rift of creative imagination and totally lacking a discrimination. It's also without the gift of the to wish in which tells a good general to choose the right course of action.

This first step toward disaster was to shelve the official British strategy. This was to capture blowing Fontaine and then retorted, thus knocking out those centers of the board government, the orange free State in the towel. Instead, distracted by the siege of Lady Smith and Kimberly, he split is Army in the three unequal parts, the simultaneous release of these big-league talents and capture of storm bird Junction Park. While this notice to dismiss were not entirely clear it was certainly consistent with three characteristics of the man. Firstly he was a kind and gentle creature, and therefore undone only stressed at what he imagine was going on behind the sieges. Secondly, he lacked confidence, protect leave the role of active supreme commander. As remarks lowered lands down: " I have always considered that I was better a second unit complex military affair been as an officer in sheet command... I had never been in a position where the whole loader responsibility fell on me. Lastly, he lacked singleness the mine. Contrary to popular belief time, which is based on to grossly misleading clues -- his parents and his bravery -- he was in fact the antithesis of the steadfast on the mourners: your resolute, indecisive in without faith in his own plans.

As a consequence of the Straits Buller lost no time in trying to read

Himself of any direct responsibility for the conduct of the war, by handing over the reins to subordinate commanders to needy no further directed. This abdication, as opposed a delegation, might have passed unnoticed at the subordinate spending a great ability. Unfortunately they were not. As a consequence, within five days three battles have been lost.

Since the principal reasons for this " impossible state of affairs -- or in a large army of professional Soldiers to be defeated three times in quick succession by handful of " on tutored presence -- they are on the central theme of this book, we must outline the nature of these engagements. However, to appreciate the factors which led to these of these we should first consider an account which immediately preceded them. This was about eligible as subordinate, General Matheson, with 8000 man was very nearly defeated by 3000 ports.

Methodist objective was to monitor river, a natural defense line for the boards. Accordingly, without any reconnaissance he ordered his troops to make a frontal attack. Since he could not see the enemy he wrongly assume that no enemy was there. Led by their officers to men advanced across the flat and open bill pours a river. All went well until they were written and easy range the boards, it concealed themselves, with what was subsequently described as being dished cunning, below the deep banks of the river.

Those in the things Army who would not killed outright by the sudden blast of fire from the invisible boar spent the day lying prostrate under a scorching sun. In temperature hundred degrees, unable to move forward or back, today, including the 70 wounded, suffered extreme discomfort from Thurston slowly blistering skin. The finish remedy was the direct heavy artillery fire onto the Boer positions. Thanks to the latter's use of cover of this barrage had very little influence on the course of events, apart from killing a number of his own troops to faulty range finding.

It was only under the cover of darkness to the British eventually withdrew, the bind firemen are dead and wounded. Because the Boer's also used tonight to pull back their line, to do matter of Weinstein Range behind the river, math in claimed the action as a victory. Others were not so sure. Court into one observer, nothing quotation are failed to display a much higher degree of generalship than a promising young softball trunk straight from Sandhurst. According to another: " everyone here is

Various with nothing for his bad generalship. He does slat bang at the position with a frontal assault and never thinks of turning the flanks. In others noted the nothing in its study the studiously ignored to sound, if obvious, observations by Lower Roberts, one of the great generals of that time. The first was that modern weapons make frontal attacks over open ground impossible. The second was at the first duty of the commanders reconnaissance.

All this may seem obvious, it evidently did not occur to nothing. But if you within a few days of his performance in monitor river he confirm the worst fears of his critics in the even more disastrous battle a Magers longtime.

On the quite unjustified assumptions to pours occupying a Magers Weinstein heels he subjected their deserted slopes to an intense artillery barrage it can several expensive British taxpayer. Total any casualties from this enterprise for three boar's killed. Without confidence born of ignorance he then ordered a frontal assault by the highly Brigade. This may the Don, following at night march.

Unknown to nothing, the bull worst were concealed Enderle trenches some distance in front of his objective. As it monitor river to wait patiently until the British came within easy range. Surprise was complete. When they opened fire at Halo bled swept through the ranks of the highly Brigade. Within minutes to ground was carpeted with did Soldiers, including the highly commander, general walk Hopi. It was too much for the remainder; despite the trading in the discipline, despite the honor of the regiment, despite all those factors which the high command finally believed would induce an educational to sacrifice themselves for the shortcomings of their generals, they broke ranks, turned tail and black. As he did so they were further pounded into moralize by Kidder to undetected batteries of boar artillery very

From his position will bind Martin, it should have been clear to nothing that the only way to save the day was to outflank the boar positions. This he refused to do. He could only order for word and fall word the high lenders, and then, like some latter Day continued, watched the rising tide of the as the high lenders fell back. The battle ended with the Army, less 1000 dead and wounded, back at the starting line.

Is worth comparing the celebrations of the British command with those of the bull worst. When due, despite his very recent experience in monitor river, could still respond only when frontal

Assaults, the bull or had applied some thought to their defenses. They were suffered a reasoned that much was to be gained by surprise and concealment. The also reasoned that high-powered rifle fire to ground label level has more chance of finding a target and one fired down from above.

Dished but it would not be uncharitable to condemn within as typical of his time, for he was not. The failed to display the patently obvious was described not so much to his limitations as to the " extraordinary ingenuity of the bull worst! Thus did you the Times history refers to the boar trenches as " one of the boldest and most original conceptions in the history of war. The

Moreover, nothing was by no means the most bull party of the Germans. There was general Featherstone palm with the battle of Belmont insisted on riding up and down from his Man in full retaliate, thereby denouncing his importance to the enemy and effectively hampering the fire his own men. It was not long before the boar is rectified is there by shooting him off his horse. And there was general heart who, at the battle of close on all, inflicted 30 minutes per raid around battle drill on his Brigade for marching them shoulder to shoulder, in very square position, across the open bill against the boar positions. Since it was broad daylight is densely packed column provided an irresistible target for every boar gun and rifle within range. In this battle the British were defeated with the loss of 1,139 casualties and 10 guns and his poor losses of six dead and 21 wounded. In the words of German staff historian: " the general and not his gallant force was defeated.

And there was general Hacker, the performance of the battle of storm per junction was singularly lacking into not. To capture his objective, Packer settled for a night march followed by a Don attack. Not only did he not know morale but he succeeded in forgetting to bring along the one man who did, a certain Captain of intelligence. As result of the appointment of two guides ( who knew no more they needed, Don found him and his army the high ideals you supposed to be in front. After some moments of consternation, during which the loss all sense of direction, the general resolutely faced his army in the wrong way with their backs to the enemy.

Having recovered from the novel experience of being attacked by an army which appeared to be moving in reverse, the pours opened fire with such devastating results that within half an hour characters force was in full retreat. We finally reached original starting point

There are delighted to find it suffered only 90 casualties very to you for you were short-lived, for second Revealed that by a mere oversight 600 British Soldiers had been left behind on the enemy held heels. Since nobody told him to retreat, the became presence of the boars. As for other blunders by senior commanders in this and other words, a cover story was sent out to preserve the general's reputation. On this occasion Datuk or had been treacherously led into an ambush.

In mitigation it might be claimed that since attack is more difficult than Defense men like nothing and Datuk or were disadvantaged in their conflict with an enemy who were after all, defending their own terrain against invading army very two points, however, deserve to be made. Personally, British Army training up to that time had always late great stress on attack, with an almost total neglect of defensive tactics. As we shall see, there are good psychological reasons for this one cited preparation for war, a bison train for which this country paid dearly in subsequent complex. In the poor war the Army was doing what he been trained for. You the point is this. While in the battle so far described British troops were on the defensive, there were other military events in which they occupy the defensive role, as for example in the sieges of Lady Smith and may became.

This makes it possible to examine the suggestion that military incompetence was confined to the handling of offense of rather than Defense of actions. When we do so, however, the hypothesis is found untenable. Even in Defense, incompetence still arranged. The best examples that bordered by Sir George White, DC, Commander in Chief Natal, will, in trying to resist the enemy, failed to carry out the most elementary precautions. White summed arranged household or who refuses to lock his door when he knows burglars are about, White omitted to carry out any measures to deny the worst use of their most valuable motive access -- the railway. He failed to mind passes, block tunnels, Lola Bridges, or in any way destroy their prime means of transportation. While this serious their election, the Times history comments: " the least damaging explanation is a Sir George White never realize fully that the worst were civilized opponents who could make use of the railway for military purposes after

________________________________________________________

* sore George White, the stature statue to be senior broadcasting house in London, was subsequently made a field marshal and companion of honor quotation ( against the advice of AJ Belfour.

as we shall see, there are multiple parallels between the slaps on the events would proceed the fall sinking working Nathan or to do. In both cases the Germans in charge responsible for the safety of the interested in population. In both cases the seriously underestimated the ability of the enemy, and this in the face of overwhelming evidence. And in both cases the imagination to carry up most elementary and obvious of precautions. * in short, the arguments to be fielded the efficient only because the difficulties attending attacks scarcely hold water.

Him in of the disappointed becomes necessary to introduce another concept which is relevant to the conduct of the South African war. This of the that be that all the effects of psychological stress upon decision-making. Is rounds in their resistance to stress, in their ability to carry on things go wrong, the good channels almost easily distinguished from poor ones.

By this standard general bull or, physically so huge, failed dismally. Their resolute from the outset, the three defeat set meg or Feinstein, storm burned junction and Calais so sapped whatever confidence he ever had. From being week interval he became a veritable jelly of indecision. His plans became baking indefinite, and a specific were scarcely more enlightening. His lack of moral Kurds in the face of adversity revealed itself most clearly in his propensity for making scapegoats of his unfortunate subordinates, who those Middle Eastern competent channels would blunder on without direction or assistants from above, will taking on the blame himself. Petitioner in nothing in these dispatches at the time to come or later in this evidence before the Royal commission in Iraq it can mean to investigate the reasons for the series of defeats bracket suggest that, even in the most roundabout way, please unplanned oval, bracket campaign bracket was in any laying manner responsible for its failure. The near seeking such an admission was a reference tube " bad luck. ⁹

Him padlock in Indian, and the worst lot must follow in the shape of that 1400 ft. monument to military ineptitude, speaking caught during the to unnecessary storming and listening not it was to the more and more what to charge the light Brigade had been sick rummy in war. The details are as follows. While still numbered by the series of him in

After the fact in the case of Singapore even greater errors of judgment had been made by politician in Army leaders before the war is immaterial to this argument

Defeats just recounted, blows Army of 29,000 infantry, 22,600 mounted men, you feel batteries until naval guns was enraged, if that is the word, by the arrival of the press division commanded by Sir Charles Warren, are. He. Together these two forces, under the Supreme command of blower, employee to try and live to see delay Smith. With Washington and despite their men superiority in Munich and equipment, it built to do so. Of him

Him so far as the British were concerned, the operation involved crossing the river to Bella and enclosing on Lady Smith be a complex of small meals and ranges of high ground. There to place at which the river can be foreign. Polar ordered one to lead the assault across one of these drips, while another force, under another general, Littleton, created a diversionary crossing of the other. For success, the plane depended upon speed limit, surprise in synchronizing the two crossings. Ideally, Warren and sports, on the LapLink, should've been over the river in well-known way to Lady Smith while Littleton was still occupying the Boer's attention on the right flank.

The planet known for several reasons. In first place in women's vision was too small for main attack. As one blur should have used in attacking for to size, in comparison with the total number of troops yet available, constituted a mere pinprick, a simple cyst suffices to know that it into court with his general policy avoiding any direct responsibility for whatever might inspire. If the worst happens it would be once Army, now yes, they would carry the blind. In due course which owns them to deeper reasons for this particular form of military incompetence.

The second reason the disaster letting the character Warren, who inscribed as Bill Torrey yet page, over conscious yet air resolute in totally ignorant regarding the use of Calvary. He was also obsessive, opposite, self opinion in excess of the dead tempered.

Littleton prostitute get a lot with his diversionary force and successfully convinced the boars of this was bold line advance, one failed to exploit situation. Set across the river with all speed he seemed to give way to certain pads and fancies. These included in session with his enormous baggage train*one year

__________________________________________________

* one of the factors which loadable worst military moon in the Boer war was a quantity of the baggage with which officers not active service. According to programmers might well include pianos longer ground phones, chest of drawers, politics, and bullish case and I and bathroom and well-equipped kitchen.

That might be destroyed by not insistent and tons and small mountain spin caught. So & as he is baggage that he spent 26 hours personally supervising accounts for cross the river. The delight was invaluable to Boers.

As of this good that mere tardiness and inefficiency gave way something more protein madness. The mountain strain of inactivity inactivity a curious folly I do soon to descend upon Buller and a subordinate. In prolonged or events were as follows:

1. very caliber erect and letter by Lord ton Donald of the territory beyond river from the revealed an obvious one in advance for once Army right

2. The atmosphere is to do Donald should have used Scout ready to make Iraqi very

3. Partly through succession of the baggage China partly because the unsolicited unwelcome information from from ton Donald, were rejected the proposed project movement and opted instead for direct the advance across the county on the range, directly to his front. Enforcing Iraqi had been made of this area.

4. It was a dismayed Buller began describing woman's behavior as petitioner in the soon in the resolute. Nonetheless, he still refuse to assume command.

5. Once assault on the to yam arrangements for the success or this is because he found the board will dog in a second rest whose existence he had the ignorant. He still refuse well find the boar positions.

6. Buller, was becoming increasingly restless, wrote over to prefer proper criticism and advice. He still planning to many orders to warn.

7. The New Orleans I know upon the condition and minutes of spin caught. Even assuming that must be captured. Buller readily agreed, and this though neither do I briefly considered such a course of action, let alone worked out what it would entail.

Any very job attacking what has been called an unknown mountain on the dark night against a determine enemy and unknown strength was given to to tell Coke. Its qualifications for the venture

It may wear it were that he had only just rides and seriously affected by again lead. At least he was no more ignorant house in awe of any of his colleagues, will do nothing about a summit -- its extent suitability for defense. No implausible or his head and tons up their, worded occurred in wanted to Boris might resent its occupation by the British. This no diversionary tactics were employed.

And so, well just a below, the minute workout the steeply sloping mountainside, into a awe hardly last dance than that which cloud mines their commanders. One, in a analyst zero visibility, they thought they'd reach the summit, the assault force halted, congratulating themselves in the total absence losses opposition, raise Union Jack not entrenched. The operative word is tried, the top was much like the rest of the mountain, solid raw. Nobody had given them in this. He cited use index, when the finding the remember to bring them. While the Miss cleared the did the best exhibit pieces of rock implausible or, only too well aware this flimsy protection provided no cover whatsoever.

If this gave them think about him were to follow, important to further implementing visibility the made a second this morning discovered. They're not where they thought they were. Instead of the summit become themselves while smoke lactose on a below mountaintop when 1700 men on peace agreement wondered by 500 yd., and about them on three sides, the Boris. The enemy opened fire. If administered rooms corpses, many would below holes inside of the head or body. Once alike and head cover the loss from shrapnel or even greater. Practicing the disposition about a guidance of directors in the general, 200 Lancashire Paul's leaders lay down and the surrender to the Boris. The place was taken by reinforcements and up from below.

No world below did nothing to help the hard-pressed troops. All but what was happening to Army on the heights above, we're in, supine did the best of times, went into a state of it has been described as Maryland. Willingness he try to interfere with the course of minutes. This was stop his battery of naval guns for showing poor positions on the neighboring pink. Each. He did so in mistaken believed to troops they were shelling reddish.

Always asking lesser equipment, he failed to establish telegraphic communication with his troops on scan spewing cop. And he does sell this particular costly error would never have occurred.

As to what he, the commanding general, should clearly Kut himself often main source of intelligence, isn't unlike troops, one can only surmise that, at some level, Aegis did not unknown. This hypothesis, that one was using what is technically known as the mechanism of denial, receives support from another series incident. A war correspondent who had witnessed dire advancement top Mountain hurry down to this commanding general. The Senate receiving this, admittedly unsolicited, information gratitude, we were impotent rage in demand that you will should be arrested for consultants. The war correspondent in question was Winston Churchill.

But one day, as we have said,. No less extraordinary was that it is commander-in-chief. Bullets contribution was violently to resist the pleas of subordinate commands for an attack upon those positions in which the blowers were so is dangerously selling is troops. Even went so far as to recall such units as administer reach peak cell button enemy. Having been allowed to remain, massacre British troops would have been surpassed substantially reduced.

When 19, those would survive the constant selling in a are decided to seek permission to withdraw. Unfortunately the Allied communication were again disrupted, this time because they had not been given sufficient wealth or signaling land. In telecommunications and within his arm is not were in strong suit very he did, however order, to tell caught to go up the mountain and bring back minutes. Once again he to great pains to avoid hearing the worst. Firstar, he selected as his messenger Alain man who do not know the country; then, just in case he did succeed in striking up and down the mountain, weren't the older precaution of shifting his headquarters to a new location. Since he can this Intel to coax absence, and without words anyone, he managed to sustain his ignorance.

So ended the battle. Having last 243 dead and 100 wounded, the Army withdrew very following day found 20,000 solid men marching back the way they can. Robert superiority in numbers, probably training on the drill squares at Aldershot, they had achieved

Nothing. Once again the region to attend an ousted by the ousting nonconformist David.

This, the last of the disasters battles, showed up weaknesses of the high command with blazing clarity. As one Should war artillery officer Mark: " if your men had our journals where should we blowers be? Those slight compared to what let in store for them years later the cost was immense by contemporary standards: 20,000 British did in only 31 months in a bill to the nation all 22,000,000 lbs..

As with other generals and other wars, mean to blowers hitherto inconspicuous energies down the outlet not in the battlefield afterwards in making scapegoats of his subordinates. In this case he was the unfortunate weren't bore the bruntin him*

The nonlinear nice example is one place in Crimean war wars in the same perspective. Both present picture of what appears to be under leave stupidity, the more interesting is a psychological pattern of these advance. There was enriching a nation anxious to assert its rights, first in Russia and then in South Africa. What did do in what did do not send out how a regimen armies which endeavored to make up encourage, discipline and visual splendor what the lacking relevant training, technology and adequate leadership? Asked to the latter, in each case the commander-in-chief was selected who despite his deficiencies remained importantly popular with its troops were far longer than deserved. Both men were genial, courteous and kind. Both were inexperienced, a resolute and lacking more urge. Both derision well-connected, a both, when the occasion demand, it only to ready to do best themselves of all responsibility to errors which they had made. And M1 seemed quite unable to learn mistakes of the other.

So strange are these phenomenal but was forced to consider the office is that some level in the minds of those each recognition aggression the launch the contrary note, I need to pulp punches. Since man is no species with its to his ability to tell at a distance cannot abatements all of those automatic inhibitors of interest species aggression which are commonplace of other animals, it is possible that he quite unconsciously uses other means to keep about

* Buller was dismissed in the Army in 1901. The following year the government publishes dispatches. These protein to have been incompetent blundering, defeatist.

And soon for Sperry deployment of such men as fraction and blow or certainly constitute such other means Sperry

Up a development of this thesis is reserved for later chapters. The moment it might prove helpful to keep in mind certain characteristics of the incompetent just described. Include:

1. An underestimation, sometimes bordering on the art in, of the enemy.

2. And Clinton on or what's more.

3. An inability to profit from past experience.

4. ole or carry a resistance to adopting an exporting and payable technology and novel tactics.

5. An aversion to reconnaissance, coupled with just like intelligence ( and both senses of the were very

6. Great physical bravery but little moral courage.

7. An apparent imperviousness by commanders to loss of life and human suffering amongst the rank-and-file, or ( its converse and irrational into vast and incapacitated and state compassion.

8. This heat and in decisiveness and senior commanders.

9. A tendency to lay the blame on others.

10. Can carry a lull the little salt very

11. A lull both quotation marble, smartness, precision and strike preservation of " the military pecking order.

12. I regard tradition and other aspects of conservatism.

13 carry a lack of creativity, improvisation, indebtedness and open-mindedness.

14. A tendency to each do moderate risks for test so difficult that failure might seem excusable.

15. Procrastination very

No said his reach Grove, nor were the scaling lattice for comments, so a second messenger was dispatched to the general, asking for reinforcements. The general, apparently now alarmed the consequences of his own rations, hastily sent any guns around to the west, in order bombardment of the four from that side.

And very natural result all. Some of the balls from the guns, going over the four, fell among our men in the other side, for the not yet been withdrawn. A report the discomfort was carried to Adrian Holt, let once wrote often and all pole, but from what followed it appears the latter bill doubted the accuracy of the statement, for hope immediately returned see for yourself.

"Good God! General, exclaimed growth, unseen him " this is no place for you. You must lie down. The becoming morning came too late for even at that moment hope fell back into the speakers bonds, shot to the chest. Soon after came the order to retire in general Wall pole road back to camp. Under cover of the

Under cover of the darkness that night the rebels lookdown before and make good turns gate.

A lots the country sustained by the death of will be, of Douglas, a branding, of everything, and of the hundred and odd man out uselessly sacrifice before we got was great; but the loss of Adrian Hope was a cause for national sorrow. His death was more than spot by every man in the camp. Allowed indeed were the invectives against the opposite stupidity which had caused it. One

The Teleport we are speaks for itself. There's little to add beyond pointing out that the trace the behavior of the unfortunate general Wall pole cannot depart significantly from those of commanders in the Russian in South African complaints.

The general Wall pole so happy expedition was not the first disaster the bald British Army in India. 16 years previously, in 1842, the catastrophe occurred beside which the event support you really do seen steadily worse a mentioned.

Around with string with the mangled corpses of their comrades and stench of death was in the air -- all along the route they had been passing little groups of Bald, starving, across Britain, and many of them in a state of juniper in idiocy. Without

Afghans, not probably kill the stragglers, is simply stripped them and left cold to do its work and now poor riches were hotly together naked in the snow, strident hopelessly to keep warm by the heat of their own bodies. Their women and children among men, the pianist Lee stretched out their hands for soccer... Later the Afghans were to report with relish that the unhappy fugitive, in their blind instinct and preserve like little Ingres, had been reduced to eating the corpses of their fellows. But the all died in the end. Number two

The British retreat from couple of the first act on war has been described by Field Marshal Sir Gerald Temple or as the " the most disgraceful emulating episode in artistry of war against Asia in the enemy up to that time. Just into the details of our British Army and 4000 fire under men was wiped out by what was, in comparison with the British strength, handful of Afghan tribesmen, the Field Marshal's words or nothing of an overstatement.

For events leading up to disastrous retreat the readers referred to signal catastrophe by Patrick McCurry. Suffice it to say that in 1842 British Army was stationed in couple, the capital Afghanistan, for the purpose of supporting the public ruler shots to sue shot. This unwise move was motivated by the believed that without a pro-British ruler in Afghanistan that country in India might be loss to Russia.

From the outset the situation in couple not bode well, nor were conditions such as to inspire confidence. Copper media by some of the worse country in the world -- towering cracks interspersed with deeper beans and now passes -- the Army's lines of communication can hardly have been more vulnerable. In the train was hostile to peace of mind, the climate was even more so. Temperatures, depending on the place and time of year, range from 120° to 40° below freezing. Death from heat stroke by death from exposure permit unlucky enough to Soldier in such a place. As of this was not enough, their worthy kill the Allies, the close of the ashes and Elizabeth, describing one witness is as savages from the remotest recesses of the mountainous districts... Many of them giants informing strength, promiscuous Lee armed with sword and shield, bows and arrows, Mass. Locks, rifles, spears in under wonder buses... Prepared to slide, wonder and destroy, for the sake of God and his profit, the eye enlightened infidels of the pin job.

each amiable creatures, and in particular the deal deal owls, apparently impervious to the rigors of nature, swarmed above the British lines of indication light color wasps above a rebel left upon.

Surveying the scene from strong linkable and conscious of the fact that the vast majority of Afghans do not want shops to show, disliked British and resented the Army of occupation, any prescient military commander might have been forgiven for taking every precaution against native uprising.

But the British, by pro-choice, were not in a strongly fortified position, from which we may draw of the not unreasonable conclusion that they were short on depressions. The reasons to find a simple explanation they chose to cite themselves in 101 stretch of low-lying snow around a mile outside the town. As Lieutenant ( later General Sir Vincent I. air remarked: per " it must always remain a wonder that any government, or any officer or set of officers, who had either science or experience in the field, shouldn't Hathcock or country fixed air forces and so extraordinary and injudicious a military position. Full

In his worst possible cite the British laid out To the worst possible design. The only was a two-mile perimeter, a purely nominal obstacle consisting of a low wall on narrow ditch, for two on to be defended by the numbers in close, but the hole was opened as northern into compound of dwellings for the British envoy staff. This hodgepodge of houses was out positively invited infiltration by even the least intrepid enemies. To complete this encourage behavior there had been one final act of such unbelievable stupidity that is repercussions for to lead the death of an Army. But were as the commanding onto, Willoughby Cotton, the armies, Center at stores were constructed in a quarter of a my outside containment. The consequences of this incision were tragic and inevitable. When Afghans only rose against the British, the Army were promptly Kut off from their supplies. House he was that under the threat of starvation the ultimate capitulated to out work on, the Afghan leader, and began the retreat which cost them all their lives.

There was us could cost feel uneasy about the situation can bull. It still might have been saying however, had the Army at this time in blast incompetent leadership.

Unfortunately it was not. Thanks to pressure from none other than the future lower practicing, the Government of India chose this moment

Elphinstone

2. Major General William George Key Elphinstone as commander-in-chief Afghanistan. He was, to say Belize, an unfortunate candidate, described at the time as the " in the most incompetent Soldier that was to be found among the officers of the requisite rank very even necessary, disqualification for certain not sufficient. There were that he was of good you, gentlemanly manners and out aristocratic connections. Yet lasting active service at Waterloo, 25 years previously, and since been on half-day. He was elderly and so stricken down he could scarcely moved.

By General Sir Denver's blower half a century later Elphinstone and no illusions about his unfitness for job, and pleaded that his health median quite unseeded to the demands it would be made upon them. But Lord Auckland, big governor general, was adamant, and sold the gentle, courteous Elphinstone was shipped off shipped off to can bull.

Once there, whatever shreds of self-confidence in Manhattan were speaks people he removed: firstly by the ludicrous nature of the armies cantonment and secondly by encountering for the first time his new second in command, Brigadier Shelton, a Roth route of uncertain temper. So appalled was Elphinstone by the armies location did he offered to buy up surrounding land so he could been clear suitable fields-of-fire. Is there for generous offer was refused. About Shelton he could do nothing.

The dissidents accelerated towards upon catastrophe. Aware loadout the British were weekly lead, Afghan resentment blossomed into rubble. Sporadic attacks on British personnel culminated in the assassination of the British resident and stacking of the residency. This these unpleasant fact, General Elphinstone sinking estate of numbing indecision. Consume my doubts, needled by his cantankerous second in command, he cast about him for it buys from everyone within reach, even down to the most genius of alternates.

Finally, he was make no, the British envoy, a civilian, became a plan. Each suggested a force under Shelton should withdraw nonsense in neighboring fortress of Dow are House this hour. Classing at his brainwave, Elphinstone ordered Shelton to march on the fortress. No sooner had his were been received, Bell, then it was countermanded. Shelton, unimpressed by the stock/build policy, retorted sharply that " it there was in insurrection in the city it was not a moment for indecision, and recommended him right Elphinstone at once to decide upon what measure he would adopt.

Elphinstone and countermanded his countermanded in once more ordered Shelton to march at once to tell artists hour. The barely had Shelton started before he was overtaken by another order to the fact that he should halt and remain where he was. No sooner had this ordered undersea, reducing the Second Amendment command to estate approaching and was all but inevitable, or there is seen that he was after all, to proceed with his men to the poor. And a surprisingly, he did.

Meanwhile, Elphinstone was canvassing opinions as to what to do next. She and her can bull imports depressed insurrection or would be more prudent Jermaine Morton will us? Should he reinforced, sorry at which contained all the armies supplies or should he withdraw its small garrison into the main cantonment? The date was wasted in field today -- a day in which the insurrection, incurs barbarous paralysis, grew a pace. Initially Elphinstone did act, it was a case of two little and too late. With Afghans rounding to the cause an ever-increasing numbers, it soon became impossible even to reach can bull. Similarly, through Elphinstone's procrastination, any question as to whether or not he should reinforced commissary became purely academic; if Bell lock, stock and barrel into the hands of the insurgents.

Determined leadership might still, however have won the day; but this only leadership is not to be found in Elphinstone. He considered launching a full-scale attack upon the Afghans, but just as quickly dropped the idea. You state of mind is reflected in letter which he been wrote to the envoy: "... If you just look to the consequences of fire, in this case I know not how we are to subsist or from want the provisions, to retreat. You should therefore consider what chance there is making terms, if we are driven to this extremity. DOS already, only three day since the on the men's murder of the British resident, the commander-in-chief was ready to accept a fee.

Having settled for the necessity of capitulation, he packed it out with you found a delusion that his Army is running short of ammunition. Once more things went from bad to worse, having satisfied himself that the Army could not, a rather would not, fight to defend itself make not uncommon to British envoy, urged on by Elphinstone, entered into negotiations. In these terms were quite uncompromising. They demanded a speech into withdraw the British from

Afghanistan. The rest of any military backing, the envoy had to accept, and a draft treaty which dropped drama. In the Nottingham, a braver man in Elphinstone, then tried to doublecross the Afghans and was murdered for his pains. Purely unmoved by the second killing our British government official, and wholly a first initiating reprisals, Elphinstone became were ingratiate and to never towards his poor mentors.

Well range, and the thirst for revenge, consume the lower ranks of the Army, those at the top became increasingly in decisive and anxious to a peace. Inevitably draft and surrender terms to you, until finally Elphinstone, in response to empty promises of said conduct, found himself agreeing that his Army without its ordinance but unencumbered I 12,000 noncombatants, including many women and children, would go back the way they come.

Having decide upon the disastrous planet on the reach allow up at into doubts a winner, across mountain ranges infested with hostile Tristate, healthy Stone proceeded to make matters worse by further procrastination. Right after January 6, 1842, he remains in an agony of mind as to whether or not he should commit his Army to march, and when, on that people day, they've initially set off he changed his mind when have to force were a underway. He tried to stop them but now is ordered to halt was this a day; recorder ill the die was cast. It was for ill. With peace known ground, 19 just Elton well below freezing, and blunt there's the Afghans return default on them as they traversed the narrow passes, the only hope successfully reaching job at lightning speed of movement. 10 about on this fearful Germany could only need gas and exposed those managed to avoid That the hands of the rotting guilt laws.

To achieve their purpose to British at the move, and fast, preferred by night when the narrow confines of the passes. But speed was denied in. Firstar, noted bother to reconnoiter a suitable route. Secondly, elf in Stone and refused to cancel the construction of a bridge across capable river despite the fact, as was one that and, the waterway was portable in several places. Since known indicator feet wet, they all conversion the bridge, to produce such among minimal bottleneck is delayed the margin columns by many hours. Finally, elf in Stone, fearful of moving by night, tactic only halted the end of each day.

Without letter would, food or any shelter beyond that provided by holes scraped in the snow, many died each night. By day, as they traversed the grim passes of word to bull, to do lock and again the Mac, thousands more died at the hands and the murderous guilt laws. And into four days, with 70 mi. ~Bill only lead and 50 remained of the original 4500 Soldiers. Buddy and 10 paid the number had been reduce the foreign and 50.

Profitable venture, Elphinstone, despite the trail of corpses which lay behind them, retained pathetic and wholly unjustified faith in the Afghan leaders promise of said conduct.

But into the day the total off as the Soldiers and civilians had risen to 12,000. As one officer a one officer described: " there was literally a continuous land of poor wretched, men, women, and children dead or dying in the cold and into, unable to move, in trade their comrades to kill them and put in into their misery.

Well is painfully prolong disaster to be attributed to many factors -- including national greed and anxiety which resulted in the invasion of Afghanistan in first place, political ineptitude in the choice military leaders, and governmental stinginess and denying sufficient funds for the extension of the British for vacations and can bull -- this year at Normandy of the catastrophe which was not bulging must be laid Elphinstone's door.

This finding gentle preacher manifested what at first sight may appear Doom be sure some curiously inconsistent characteristics. His own admission, he saw " the bubble reputation in India and yet, when given informing command, shrink from the responsibilities which entail. He was hopelessly in decisive, lacking immoral curtains adjustable, get could come on occasions, manifest irrational pigheadedness. He well pulled and should confirm, it was rigid when he should having flexible. Finally, he was purchasing time, retaining the affection many of his followers right Dien, you could be totally lacking compassion for many of those would suffer that his hands.

Isn't flexibility is highlighted by his refusal to into the for a bell Firstar, even though his suffering columns of Soldiers and civilians passed close to this at this underway to July Lebed. Of this episode report rewrites:

The danger, Lawrence bracket officers of healthy Stone staff still halt

against hope that the 11th hour Alpine stunned would come to his senses and or the Army to more straight in an occupied that will stronghold before the Afghans could rally to prevent them. The eldest and was not the man to be cable such an audacious change of plan. The crossroads were reached, the advance guard turn left worked allow a bad and the bowel artists are died away in the winter dots behind them. By ⁵

Is to lack a compassion shown in the following incident:

To the misery of hunger was added to misery of coal, was bitter Afghan winter had descended upon the wretched inhabitants of the cantonment. Before the end of November, sleek and snow became a daily occurrence, with a moment or at freezing point, and from mid-December to onward the ground was inches deep and snow. Indian troops suffered traditionally from the call, but although there was a complete winter stock of firing virus were not allowed. Stir pressed eldest elements still could at least fires may be printed nights, so the men coming off duty from the ramparts might worm themselves and tried across encrusted close, but nothing was done in the miserable troops tanks sank deeper and apathy and non-despair. ⁶

In some significance for matters to be dealt with later, there is the following incident on the subject of dress:

The danger, who had noticed that as soon as the firstall every Afghan. In his legs "s wafting racks, not versatile horse blanket should be caught into strips which achieves could roll petite fashion around her feet and legs. The sensible suggestion presuming soon-to-be the high command to the high command post lovingly and unsalted, for nothing was done, and trends were left to the misery of the hard leather boots. With minute a few hours of the start of the marched across the done its work in hundreds were suffering agonies of frost bitten feet. ⁷

Finally there is the case the hostages. When he Afghan sheep out more can offered protection to hostages L. Alpine stunned took the opportunity of sending Allies not only all minute in children but also their mental. However: " no one supposed for moment he was referring to any but the British wives and children, no Allies

77

Any plea to the mall for more numerous wives and children of deceitful ace and can't all... These were native and expendable and the

Alpine stunned concern that officers Wendy should also benefit from protection did not extend to Wendy other ranks, the work apparently of no account. These attitudes, which in the present instance stabilized several British women and their officer husbands what cost Allies of thousands of lesser mortals, it is, as we shall see, not without significance but there is a military incompetence.

To conclude this account of the total disillusionment Army: on January 13, 1842, Soldiers on guard at the British war in July Lebed saw a single horsemen riding porcelain, with all speed it is maimed and we're not worse could muster. It was a surgeon Dr. Brighton, the only man, it seemed, to survive the fearful journey thinkable. * when news of the disaster reached London and Indian, much mental energy which are voted to discovery of scapegoat. The two favorites for this roll workshops to.com accused by his critics of treachery, and Alpine stones in the deceitful ace. In either case worthy accusations justified. Stir just had in fact remain loyal to the last. As for the sea poise, the drag from the warmth of their native India to fight another man's war in the freezing climate of Afghanistan, then, if anything, thought more bravely in dirt what were for them particularly adverse conditions more still leaving any other unit of help in stones Army. But they are convenient scapegoats, because they were dead.

For a fitting epitaph to these men there is the following description for the subsequent relief force:

Pollock's force was marching back a long line developing stones disaster should treat... And every point became upon ghastly evidence of the fate of the couple force. Rotting corpses and skeletons picked clean by carrying met them at every turn. And teasing it down a pile of 1500 corpses of Alpine stones sea poise in camp followers, we distributed by the Afghans left to die and snow. In the court to ball pass, wrote Captain Black worse, the site of the remains of the

* pricing was the only European to arrive until a bad, but in the days after his arrival a few Indian Soldiers of the number of followers also completed the journey. Alvin stones self-guided dysentery after being made To buy out more con.

78

Unfortunate callable floors with spear for lead heart writing. They lay in each the fifties in hundreds, are done wheels passing over and crushing skulls and other bones of hour late comrades at almost every yard. ⁹

A rather more accurate leveling and blame men that applied by armchair critics came from a manually been there, the tenant loans. Hour All Army Terrace, sacrificed to the incompetence, people miss, and want to skill and resolution of the military leaders. Can

To conclude this are to elders lease one point in some significance. When he heard of the trouble suitable toward Auckland shows as Commander of relief force a certain Major General moment. Like Alvin Stone, women made up and gentle manners and courtesy went lacking driver physical stamina. Porsche he was so L. and so decrepit that is Dr. drill the could not possibly assume the role that Auckland had wished upon them. It's another was chosen in his place.

The story begins in August 1914 Smith Doreen, commanding second Corps of the deep. He. Aft., in contact with the enemy at lockout so, and his commander-in-chief surge on French installed edge each cheese 35 mi. on the minds.

Sore Horace said in order to retreat.com realizing the to do so would jeopardize the hull of the BET aft, he ignored the HQ and acting on his own initiative, in case the enemy.

This delay action paid off. Instead of being enveloped, the Army was able to withdraw, we're rebut intact, to fight another day, that's rescuing surge on French from the wooded been the results of his own incompetence.

Now for reasons which went deeper, and further back in time, surge on French, weak, Iraq's couple, trustee, and indifferent and inefficient, nursed any

83

Jealous dislike of this competent Corps commander. Under the circumstances is hardly surprising that Smith-Dorrien stand at Lee So would scarcely calculated to evoke one feelings of gratitude and his cheek. But worse was to follow.

It seems that, totally out of touch with what was going on at front ( having withdrawn his headquarters of further 35 mi. in the scene of enemy activity, and envisage quite incorrectly that Smith -- Gordon's troops were fleeing from an enemy in hot pursuit, French ordered all spare ammunition in officers kits should be banned.

To Sir Horace, the man on the spot, the order, pieces that was on false promise, conserve no possible advantage. Indeed, as its effect upon the row premises in the days when officers had by all their own kit would be wholly back. He chose to ignore it.

Only kill well where this Corps Commander had, the second time, same thing from his own ineptitude, Sir John was none to please. Understandable in gratitude he dressed himself to them p* removing those troublesome subordinate. This chance came upon nine months later when the Germans attacked at one per as with a new weapon -- chlorine nerve gas.

Despite considerable evidence from many sources that the enemy were about to use this new weapon, near the Frenchman the British high command prepared to meet. No nearly forgiven, no precautions taken. In the event, casualties were small white later standards but in the nature singularly unpleasant. Seriously, the fallen back of troops on either flank left British second Army surrounded on three sides in and sentimentalize death track on they press sound selling. Under the circumstances, Smith -- Doran, now in command of second Army, wrote an appreciation of the situation in which he stressed the high cost of life in a further contacts and advocated a withdrawal to new defense line Westview press.

This was all that French needed. On the ground Smith -- Doran and displayed his orders and was now a source of dangerous pessimism, he forced resignation from one of his and listen most valuable channels -- one in making itself a congratulated on his saving them to be. He. After. At least Total nine months earlier.

A few days after source had been relieved of his command and sent home ( on the pretext of ill health, Sir John's authorized the very withdrawal which is subordinate had advocated. Another in the words of day

84

And contemporary writer: "there is no accounting for how a man in so high position could behave DOS, or how man capable of such behavior could have been placed in so high position. ⁶ fortunately Sir John's record of an attitude Koppel thing. At the Battle of lose his failure to position reserves were they could be of any possible assistance, and the discrepancy between what he said he died in what he in fact had done cost the British Army 60,000 casualties and himself his job

While one must congratulate de Mole on receiving, if not financial reward, at least some delayed credit for his ingenuity, there are one or two inconsistencies in the Royal Commission's statement. In first place, the idea of an armored fighting vehicle [AFV] was neither new nor head of its time. Forerunners of the tank can be traced back to Caesar's invasion of Britain. Leonardo da Vinci had designed an armored fighting vehicle in the 16th century, and the concept was advanced by H.G. Wells in his book, The Land Ironclads, published in 1903.

Photo courtesy of www.national-army-museum.ac.uk/pages/boer.html

Soldiers and their baggage towed by steam traction engine 1900(c); Steam traction engines were used to move heavy loads along roads and across countryside, thereby helping to conserve draught animals, which had only a short life expectancy in South Africa. A similar fate awaited the majority of horses used by the mounted troops. These animals were all too frequently put to work unacclimatized, ill-fed and ill-cared for. During the course of the War, some 350,000 horses and 50,000 mules perished.

87

felt less "threatened" by tanks than did the War Office was strikingly illustrated and one of those demonstrations wherein proponents of a new idea strive to convert skeptics by confrontation with the evidence of their senses. After impeccable display, in which prototype tanks cut through barbed wire, cross trenches, slithered through mud and clawed their way out of craters, a naval officer was heard to remark: "We ought to order 3,000 now!" But the War Office contingent remained cool, one senior general reporting: "Who is this damned naval man saying we will want 3000 tanks? He talks like Napoleon."

So much for the first stage in the adoption of tanks. In the second rather different class of error came to the fore -- that of premature application. The occasion was the third phase of Haig's Somme offensive, an operation so dismal that, as one writer put it: "Even the commanders most eager for this kind of warfare were shocked.² Haig himself, to his eternal credit, had always been enthusiastic rather than obstructionist in his attitude towards tank development, but now, carried away by his own enthusiasm, decided to throw in the first few tanks been available. Opinions are divided, but some consider this an unwise decision. As Churchill said in his war memoirs: "The ruthless desire for a decision at all costs lead in September to a most improvident disclosure of the Caterpillar vehicles." Likewise. Lord George considered their use in such small numbers premature. But Haig was nothing if not obstinate. If few tanks then available were thrown in -- not en masse, but piecemeal.

Even so, compared with what had done before, they achieved a small but spectacular success. The because they were too few in number, and their breakthrough not adequately exploited, the tanks were unable to prevent the offense the from being, in the end, a cost defeat. Cooper writes:

The snow apart played by the tanks, however successful on the local scale, but was overlooked indigenous since the failure... Doubts which many staff officers had previously expressed as to the value of tanks turned to scorn. Instead of trying to plan an intelligent use of the superior weapon that had been put in their hands, the military leaders could only make criticisms of minor details. They conveniently forgot that it was they who had ordered so few tanks to be built in the first place, and it was Haig's own decision, against the

88

advice of those who were beginning to understand the nature of tank warfare, to order them into battle before their crews had been properly trained and before they were available in sufficient numbers to make a worthwhile contribution. ³ (italics mine)

Frustrated by failure, and unable to admit their own contribution to defeat, they did what the highly prejudiced do in such a circumstance, vented their feelings upon the original object of their prejudice, and in so doing precluded any chance of learning from the exercise. As Liddell-Hart put it: "Criticism fastened on faulty details and particular failures, with little sense of proportion, and still less imagination." A year later the price of prejudice was paid in full.

If anything, the premature use of tanks, on the Somme and later at Third Ypres, sharpened the conflict between those progresses who had now seen with their own eyes what tanks could do (at St. Julien alone in was estimated that they saved over a 1, 000 casualties) and the reactionaries, including Haig's Chief of Staff, who did everything they could to curtail their use. Thus, a thousand tanks were ordered, but then the Army Council canceled the order. Fortunately Lloyd George stepped in and cancelled the cancellation. Then Fuller produced a pamphlet on tank tactics which, because it stressed the advances of surprise and a short bombardment, was promptly withdrawn by GHQ. Since the Third Army Commander of Artillery was sympathetic towards Fuller, he too was withdrawn! Finally Swinton, would had probably done more for development for developing the tank than any other single man, was removed from his post as Tank Commander, large because GHQ, deplored the lack of discipline in tank crews -- they looked too dirty! Swinton was replaced by a General Anley, whose job it was to "inject discipline into the tank corps". Anley went on record with the reassuring comment that he "was not interested in tanks".

Meanwhile the futile Third Battle of Ypres continued to consume the lives of infantrymen at the rate of more than 2000 a day. Never at loss, GHQ blamed this waste of life upon the few tanks that had been used. It seems they disappeared into the mud along with everything else.

But the forces of progress were still at work. Despite the gloomy resistance a senior staff officers at GHQ, Haig was persuaded to let the Tank Corps try again, on ground of its own choosing.

89

The Cambrai tank offensive on November 20, 1917, occurred in three stages. The first was imminently successful. 380 tanks operating on ground suited to Caterpillar tracks achieved a spectacular success, overrunning three strongly held lines of enemy trenches. Whereas previous offenses have been measured in yards gained for tens of thousands of lives lost, the Cambrai advance was 4 and a half miles on a 6 mile front with negligible casualties.

But if the the first stage was an unprecedented victory, the second showed a beginning of the rot which was to turn victory into disaster. There were various contributory factors.

The first was General Harper, whose 51st Highland Division had been given the task of capturing a key objective in the center of the attack -- the village of Flesquieres. Unfortunately Harper, who has been described as a "a narrow-minded Soldier of the old school", was one of those who disapproved of tanks. Consequently not only were his troops given little training in working with the new weapon, but they were instructed in tactics contrary to those recommended by the Tank Corps. Even worse, Harper delayed his assault by one hour because he did not believe that the first objective, the Hindenburg Main Line, would be captured so quickly. In the event, the Hindenburg line was crossed at 8:30 a.m. but Harper's timetable for the next stage had been fixed for 9:30 a.m. and this, despite the evidence and the senses, he resolutely refused to change. The unnecessary delay allowed the Germans an hour in which to bring up and sight six field guns on the Flesquieres Ridge. Here's one description of what followed:

... The tanks continued blithely onto the crest of the ridge, in-line abreast as instructed. They came to the top, huge dark shaped silhouetted against the skyline. And there before them were the German field guns. Had the infantrymen been close behind the tanks as Fuller had planned, they could easily have dealt with these guns in a matter of minutes, but the infantry were far behind, not only held up by having to find their way through the wire but because of the machine gun fire which was causing heavy casualties. The tanks were on their own. With such perfect targets the German gunners opened fire. One by one the tanks were hit, while crews worked desperately at the cumbersome gears to drive a zigzag course and the gunners tried to return fire. But taking accurate aim in all the pitching

90

and tossing was virtually impossible. It was some minutes before the German guns were put out of action... but by this time 16 tanks had been destroyed, with huge gaping holes in their sides. Most were on fire, and those crew members who had not been killed outright by the blasting shells were burned to death. There were no survivors. ⁴

Woollcombe, whose grandfather was a corps commander in the Cambrai offensive, has, has in his account of the tank battle, presented General Harper in a rather more charitable light. His strongest argument against criticism of Harper is that since the corps commander was renowned for being a strict disciplinarian, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed Harper to deviate in training or tactics from what had been laid down.

Be that as it many, the following facts suggested that the hold up at Flesqiueres had its origins in the prejudices of a reactionary General. Firstly, Harper's assault was one hour later than it need have been. Secondly, it was only in his sector of the front that the infantry failed to follow closely upon the mobile armor. Thirdly, Harper had already gained a reputation for obstinancy and the possession of a closed mine, by his unbelievable opposition, well into the war, to development of the machine gun. Finally, Harper and his division enthusiastically supported the legend of a mythical German artillery officer who single-handedly, destroyed all the tanks on the ridge. This legend, which served to exonorate Harper by finding another reason for the hold up, gained significant impetus from those who still managed to sustain the belief that artillery and cavalry would always prove superior to tanks. Anyway, whatever its origin, the hold up played a significant part in the next stage of the battle.

This was to have been an exploitation of the favorable situation created by the tanks. The force destined for this task was three divisions of cavalry. For what one observer described as "our medievil Soldiers" it was the opportunity for which they been waiting since the outbreak of the war. They failed for three reasons. Firstly, the delay at Flesquieres robbed the offensive of its momentum, thereby losing the possibility of a German rout. Secondly, because they were under the control of a headquarters far behind the front line, the local calvalry commanders were unable to act promptly in the changing situation. While they hung about waiting for orders, the Germans brought up

91

reserves and regrouped. Thirdly, it was proved, if proof was necessary, that when slowed down by wire or difficult ground there are few easier and more vulnerable targets for enemy machine guns than a horse. Add to this fact that, owing to the enormous losses in the Ypres offensive, there were no infantry reinforcements for Cambrai and it is not surprising that the battle ground to a halt. Through a pious and mistaken believed the value of horse cavalry, and paralysis of thought occaaioned by years of trench warfare, the brilliant breakthrough by the tanks was thrown way.

Some 10 days later the Germans counterattacked. In a matter of hours they recovered much of the ground originally lots. The British Third Army, commanded by General Sir Julian Bying , lost 6000 men taken prisoner, some thousands killed or wounded, and a vast quantity of guns and other equipment.

The magnitude of this disaster was directly attributable to a feature of high-level military incompetence seen all too often: the ignoring of intelligence reports which do not fit in with preconceived ideas. Before the German attack, Bying had received evidence from local commanders that the Germans were massing reinforcements for counter-offensive, but this information was ignored. No attempts were made to strengthen British positions. Requests from local commanders for artillery support to disrupt German preparations were refused. British tanks were restaurant and prepared for enrailment to rear areas.

That the attack, when it came, was not more disastrous can be attributed to the initiative of some local commanders who, despite a total lack of encouragement from GHQ, took what precautions they could to stem the threatened onslaught. It was also thanks to the resourcefulness of certain young Tank Corps Commanders who, on their own initiative, when the German onslaught started, halted the entrainment of tanks and made them ready for the battle. This resourcefulness, combined with the irrepproachable bravery and superb fighting qualities of NCOs and men, turned what might have been a rout into a costly and serious setback.

We now come to the last, perhaps saddest, stage of the Cambrai affair, the discovery of scapegoats. This process, to be efficient, most white wash the true culprits, (and their friends) while effectively muzzling those who might be a position to question this action. This muzzling is a subtle process, the main inducement to silence being the unspoken

92

threat that any attempt to undo the "scapegoating" might put the undoers in jeopardy. Secondly, it must "discover" scapegoats who are not only plausible "causes" but also unable to answer back. Thirdly, it must impute to the scapegoats undesirable behavior different from that which actually brought about the necessity of finding a scapegoat. By so doing distracts attention from the real reason for the disaster and therefore the real culprits.

Using these criteria as a yard stick, the apportioning of blame which followed the Cambrai debacle makes Raglan's treatment of Nolan, and Buller's of Warren, amateurish to say the least. When news of the disaster reached Britain, it was naturally assume that the generals had failed again. Haig's reputation, already low, sank to vanishing point. The War Cabinet demanded an immediate explanation.

Haig's response was to endorse a report from General Byng that the Third Army had not been taken by surprise and that the failure to stem the German breakthrough was due to shortcomings of those junior officers, NCO's and men who had been involved in the fighting. In the face of such contrary evidence, these views did not impress the critics. Byng was asked to explain why no reinforcements had been sent up to that part of the line was the enemy had chosen for his breakthrough. He replied in many been asked for, and that he and his commanders had considered that no further troops were needed. Again, Haig supported these palpable untruths and opined that no criticism should attach to a senior commanders.

2004 EDITOR: this is exactly the kind of lying BS generals in Iraq are saying now that no one has requested more tracked armor when we know for a FACT junior commanders are asking for them.

To stifle further debate, the War Cabinet called in General Smuts. Not very surprisingly, this "great operator of fraudulent idealism" came down the sides of the generals. After studying all the reports from divisional commanders and above, while studiously ignoring the fact that the VII Corps Commander had warned GHQ of the impending attack and had received no response to this or to is request for reinforcements, Smuts said: "Higher Command Army or Corps Command were not to blame -- everything had been done to me such an attack." He went on to say that the fault lay either with local commanders who might have lost their heads are with those lower down -- junior officers, NCO's and men. Of these two alternatives each preferred the latter explanation. And so smuts, in the fashion of the day, blamed those least able to answer back -- the youthful, the junior and the dead.

All in all, this black episode raises several matters of great relevance

93

to the theory of military incompetence presented later in this book. Stupidity does not explain the behavior of these generals. So great was their fear of loss of self-esteem, and so imperative their need for social approval, that they could resort to tactics beyond the reach of any self-respecting "donkey". From their shameless self-interest, lack of loyalty to their subordinates and apparent indifference to the verdict of posterity, a picture emerges of personalities deficient in something other than intellectual acumen.

As to how they look to contemporary chronicler, there is the following passage:

And so the white-washing went on, to protect armchair generals who in the main had little conception the what the front line was like -- and had no intention of going and find out. One of those infantrymen so blamed was J. H. Everest. During the two days when he and his fellow Soldiers were being pushed back by the Germans, they had no water to drink and no food to eat. At the end of the second day, while waiting entrenched for a renewed attack, Everest went up to his company commander and asked for permission to search for water. "My request was refused" Everest wrote later. "Nevertheless, I went over the top and found some water in a mud hole, thus ending two days of torture." Shortly afterwards Everest was wounded and found himself in the Australian General Hospital at Abbeville... But the most bitter pill all all on top of all this was to be blamed for their commander's own mistakes. ⁵

One of the consequences of these and other comparable and events in the First World War was that they almost certainly terminated for all-time been hitherto forever reverential and blind faith which troops had in the generals. In an organization renowned for striking loyalties between men in junior ranks, and in a war whose frightfulness was relieved only by comradeship and altruism in dangers shared, this betrayal by senior commanders cannot but have produced a lasting cynicism.

It could, of course, be argued that this was the one good which came out of the Cambrai affair. The same might also be said of the next example from the First World War, except that so few survived to tell the tale.

Any doubts as to correct interpretation of these unedifying facts are dispel by three subsequent events. The first is a minor when, but nonetheless revealing. When Townshend learned in all her successor range have been promoted to Lt. General he burst into tears and what upon the shoulder of a shrinking a sub all turn, because he knew the Greens promotion met none for him. The second is it in the did, in fact, leave is division to die is prisoners of the Turks. The third is it needed then nor later did he so much as lift a finger to ameliorate their plight.

For present purposes little remains to be said. After 147 days, Townshend's food supplies, which it originally stayed with only last month, ran out very confident from his exchange with the Turkish commando commander that he would be treated generously, he capitulate on April 19, 1916, and hit it is weak in starting men over to the not so tender mercy of the Turks. It was there perhaps to first. While the was transported in the greatest comfort to Baghdad and Nancy Constantinople, is 13 dozen men began their to 1200 mi. march across the air wastes and freezing heights of Asia minor. And while he was winding time, honored in entertained as a personal guests at the Turkish commander-in-chief, his men died in their thousands of starvation, dysentery, Colorado tied this, and from the widths of their bed tempered Curtis stand guards. They died a did he by day in a poll by night. They died because the weary disdain Allied -- dropping out of the column, to be set upon by Moroccan Arabs pool, having Rabin, Gilder mouse was standing stones. In all, 70% of the British and 50% of the mean troops perished in captivity. The Townshend was spared the sordid details for he

Travel by train arrived at Constantinople on June 3, to be met by the TOC of the Turkish army, his staff, members of the war off his attic router respected disrespectful locals... He felt very flattered: and was even more flattered to be entertained later at Constantinople's best restaurant, then escorted by a detachment of Calgary... To the waterfront, were enable tenants we became. His baggage, staff in-service aboard, he

105

sale 10 mi. down the Seymour Morrow to the fashionable island overhauled key, where, high on a cliff, he took up residence in a comfortable Villa... That same day, in the building that Turks called a hospital, those bracket of Townshend's troops bracket still too ill to march from some Morrow were being allowed by the captors to die in agony. There was no treatment for them and very little food, and those who fouled their beds forgiven injection of brandy colored fluid after which they stopped fouling the beds because there are dead... My that same day, Mormon third of the British troops doing Townshend had vowed that he was leading nimble only to procure their racket creation at died. ¹⁰

As a person most responsible for the disaster of Kut and for that Ms. Early misery inflicted upon his troops, Townshend might well of expiration tried exp saintly some other, guilt. That he did not raises several interesting issues, not the least of which being the suggestion that membership of hierarchical authoritarian organization in some way up solves individual from being hampered in his actions by this tiresome a motion. In the present instance, for example, Townshend was by no means unique in being apparently the void of the sentiment which most people experience. Nixon, too, seen quite unmoved at what his bid for Gloria Costas Soldiers under him. There was Nixon out of fashion. Is superior Sir Beauchamp top, commander-in-chief India, was similarly minded. This unbecoming trait showed itself most clearly when he forbade British exchange prisoners*from Kut to publicize the suffering of those they had left behind. In this connection Bradley makes interesting point that will by making public the fearful conditions suffered by Japanese prisoners of war in Thailand, the British government bracket in 1943 bracket procured for them and almost immediate ameliorate: in 1916, by saying nothing, and by Muslim those who wanted to speak, Townshend and doubts condemned 10,000 of their troops to months of agony and death. ¹¹

In considering these data one is forced to the conclusion that the behavior of the generals has something in common with that Eichman initiation, blue, as we know, were able to carry other job without apparently experiencing guilt or compassion.

_________________________________________

* of the thousands of prisoners, 345 were exchanged one equals number of Turkish prisoners.

106

It's as to what that hope something called might be, a suggested clues provided by another facet of the Kut of their to which Brandon draws attention. It concerns extraordinary fact of all the senior officers and Townshend's force only one shows to share the fate of the man is a Martian `captivity, and this was Major General malice -- a general is different from Townshend, Nixon and off as Christ was different from varices. ( not that there was anything over the Christlike about malice. On the contrary, his reputation for swearing and bloodthirsty, reckless Kurds was second to none in higher than most. The rough times in blister Linley outspoken, malice nursed a great compassion for his men and used is not in considerable powers of invective to bully the Turks and improving conditions for their captives. (

Not so Townshend and his other senior officers, who know, no doubt regretfully in some cases, allowed their loyal troops to go one way -- to adapt well, while they want another, to a life of compared easing comfort. Why? One reason is that the Queens Jane's regulations did not stipulate that officers to go in the captivity with their men. Had Townshend's officers been ordered to stay with the troops, doubtless they would have done so. But they are not an still be did not, in Kings regulations can doing their flouting of the old precept: " no privilege without responsibility vote *

In conclusion, one .demands particular emphasis. In the mismanagement of the missile pertaining campaign sheer stupidity played a rather relatively minor role. Certainly doth was no genius and Dixon was unintelligent, the Townshend was not. This page were decided for them not so much by " idiots " as by commanders with marked cycle pathic traits. Stupidity and interstate may have been there may have been, but it was the ambitious striding of disturbed personalities which accounted for the loss of Townshend's force.

In such matters as vanity, personal ambition, dishonesty and lack of compassion, Townshend was not unique. Where he differed from others wasn't assessing charm, intelligence and professional expertise. In a world of the square, the pompous in the desperately unfunny, Townshend had a refreshingly light touch and could read he that bomb on me what you're in for him to sober quit " a lovely man ". It was

_______________________________________________

* as pilgrimage shown in his studies of obedience ( see page 269 (, even the most inhumane of acts may be carried through by the nicest of people without restraint from guilt provided they are sanctioned by the trappings of authority.

107

Me the possessions of these qualities which so endeared him to his men that they were prepared to be of the most all his faults. The suggestion scratch that the evidence suggests that he was not so popular with his fellow officers, who thought him will French applied ". It is possible that some awareness of this veiled criticism only served to sharpen his appetite for enhancement. For underneath the agreeable the near or lay a fatal flaw which showed itself into revenues, self-destructive hunger for popular acclaim. Though its origin remains obscure, Townshend gave the impression of a man was sometime had suffered traumatic damage to his self-esteem which resulted in an everlasting need to be loved. This hypothesis gains strength from an instant accounted by Brad which, those trivial in itself, is curiously revealing. It concerns the generals talk, spot.

That night, on debt, and tempting to sleep, but lobbyists [Townshend's Batman] shivered more than usual: and Townshend top Townshend's dog was so cold that he crept up the bogus and smuggled against them. Each warming the other, they fell asleep

Boca so wonderful yell pink and found Townshend crashing his dog. Struggling upright, he demanded, quotation " what are you doing that forced her? "

"he was sleeping with you! " Townshend snarled, still thrashing."he's my dog and he's got to learn. "

"he's a harsh bastard, " Bill Gates decided. But he was puzzled nonetheless. Townshend was devoted to spot, as he was to his course. ¹²

Bogus was right in crediting his general with devotion for spot. When Kut to pass related, Townshend's concern for the welfare of his dog was considerably more evidence than that for his troops. He then made a successful appeal to the Turkish commander that the animal should be spared the rigors of attack captivity in return to Basra.

The published need hardly have been puzzled. The pathological jealousy which cleared up in an assault upon the below the spot and overrode in the feelings of compassion he might otherwise have had for the two frozen creatures lying outside his door was quite consistent with Townshend's other characteristics.

The air we shall illustrate certain qualities of the personality by reference to particular top ranking Nazis. While not for a moment suggesting equation between the people concerned in the military incompetence

108

The {these pages, the fact remains as some of the Nazi leadership, exhibited, I'll be in extreme in protest the terrible form, some of personality traits of or more in net military commanders. Using this yardstick for measure of Townshend, is personality approximates most nearly to that of boring. Like to write Marshall, he exceeded bomb Amin, was sipper retic in his tastes and universally popular with his compatriots. But underneath the OK all fellow whale met " exterior lurk that same preoccupation with the fruits of power the consume the stout German. Like Goring Townshend was professional, pray the narcissistic, and like Goring his goals were selfish rather than ideological. Goring and content usually referred to grow this ideological nonsense " and was on the shame in the in for it for what he could get out. Likewise, Townshend betrayed by his deeds in the countless letters which he wrote to those who might pull strings on his behalf that he too was " in it " for the pickings. But Townshend also possessed one trade quite pointed Goring, the president and large commander measure in other members of the Nazi elite: a totally unrealistic appraisal of the effect of his actions might have on the opinion of others. Bastard he simply cannot grasp the people would fail to be amused by his amending the troops who would serve them so loyally. He could not understand that speech which he made when he was a patriot, a speech in which he referred to themselves as having been will be honored guest of the Turks ", would hardly in. The friends and relatives of the 7000 who died in captivity. The one so anxious for love and social approval and personal esteem, he was curiously unrealistic. And afterwards, when subject to the cool breath of official disapproval, he still persisted in writing to those whom he thought would help them to a new position of power. He never, never could take no for an answer.

__________________________________________

*a common characteristic of psychopathy.

www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWbelisha.htm

Leslie Hore-Belisha was born in Devonport in 1893. Educated at Clifton College and Oxford University he served as a major in the British Army during the First World War.Hore-Belisha, a member of the Liberal Party, worked as a journalist and lawyer before entering the House of Commons for Devonport in 1923. In 1931 Hore-Belisha supported James Ramsay MacDonald and the National Government and became chairman of the National Liberal Party. MacDonald rewarded Hore-Belisha by appointing him Financial Secretary of the Treasury. In 1934 he became Minister of Transport. He successfully reduced the number of road accidents by introducing Belisha becons at pedestrian crossings, a new highway code and driving tests for motorists.In 1937 Neville Chamberlain appointed Hore-Belisha as Secretary of State for War. This was a controversial decision as the former holder of the post, Alfred Duff Cooper, was popular with the British armed forces. Hore-Belisha introduced a series of reforms to improve recruitment. Pay and promotion prospects were improved for all ranks, together with more generous pensions. He also introduced modernised barracks with showers and recreation rooms. Married men over the age of twenty-one were now allowed to live with their families. Hore-Belisha upset the Army Council by replacing three senior members with younger and more flexible men. He also upset Neville Chamberlain by suggesting the introduction of military conscription during his negotiations with Adolf Hitler in 1938. His attempts to persuade Chamberlain to rapidly increase spending on the armed forces was also unsuccessful.In the House of Commons the Conservative Party MP Archibald Ramsay was the main critic of having Jews in the government. In 1938 he began a campaign to have Hore-Belisha sacked as Secretary of War. In one speech on 27th April he warned that Hore-Belisha "will lead us to war with our blood-brothers of the Nordic race in order to make way for a Bolshevised Europe." Hore-Belisha had a poor relationship with General John Gort, Chief of the Imperial General Staff. By the outbreak of the Second World War the two men were not on speaking terms. In May 1939 Archibald Ramsay founded a secret society called the Right-Club. This was an attempt to unify all the different right-wing groups in Britain. In his autobiography The Nameless War Ramsay argued: "The main object of the secret society was to oppose and expose the activities of Organized Jewry... Our first objective was to clear the Conservative Party of Jewish influence." Ramsay continued his campaign against Hore-Belisha and even distributed in Parliament free copies of right-wing magazines that included articles attacking the Secretary of War. Neville Chamberlain eventually decided to remove Hore-Belisha as Secretary of State for War and appoint him as Minister of Information. Lord Halifacts objected, claiming that it was "inappropriate to have a Jew in charge of publicity." In January 1940 Hore-Belisha was sacked as Secretary of State for War.In 1945 Winston Churchill appointed Hore-Belisha as Minister of National Insurance. However, he lost office when the Labour Party won the 1945 General Election. Leslie Hore-Belisha, who lost his seat in the election, died in 1957.

in mitigation the military shortcomings it's been customary to blame the politicians, this in the ground the Soldiers, sailors and airmen, however senior men may be, or ultimately subservient civil government. in very, prime ministers in war ministers see to it that the armed forces are not run by incompetence, or, as clements output:"war is to serious business to be left to the generals. while but in practice, because they profess specialist knowledge, and because, in times and national emergency, there is an understandable dependency upon upon them, some military leaders, even in the democracies, have become adapted manipulating their civilian bosses. such was the case over the issue of war minister were bell shut. they seems that he was not appreciated by the military establishment. five reasons, relevant to our general. military incompetence, maybe advanced for this antipathy. firstly, he was probably brighter than some of the senior offers with an ideal. secondly, his ideas for the army were progress. thirdly he made no bones about using Liddell-Hart as his military adviser. fourthly, he was, with every justification, critical of the generals whose job it was to prepare the British army in France against the German assault on the west in 1940. thirdly, he was a Jew.

Neville Chamberlain

it was for a mixture of these reasons to the journal staff persuading Chamberlain to sack demand would probably done more for the army and the fans in any other single person during hitler's rise to power. a time when this ng inability were most sorely needed, or bell shut down in south nose and the war ministry to the board of trade.

114

another progressive civilian, Jeffrey Pike, described by the times is one of the most original and unrecognized figures of the past century, phone on until 1948, then committed suicide will from despair of official bones imperviousness to new ideas will.

to understand the psychology of these reactionary elements in the military establishment, a man who chose to make army their career, and painstakingly painstakingly worked their way out the hierarchy to the highest positions, then behave in such manner as to insure that they are remembered all it will be only for their conservatism, needs must have recourse to eagle psychology. this assumes that, in the present instance, military leaders like Devereaux, Montgomery-Massenberg, mill, iron side in port displayed behavior symptomatic of extremely weak egos very in this light, their behavior typifies neurotic paradox in which individuals need to be loved breeds, on the other hand, an insatiable desire for maturation with avoidance of criticism, and, on the other, and equally devouring urge for power and positions of dominance. the paradox is the these needs inevitably result in behavior so unrealistic as to the victim the very criticism which he'd been striving so hard to avoid terror. no

consider a few concrete examples of syndrome. were those who have despaired of anyone ever learning anything from the events of the first world war, 1933 brought a deleted gleam appalled with the publication to Kirke Committee report, which was not uncritical of the high command. he could hardly have been otherwise. but there were those for whom preservation of personal reputations counted for more than the need to avoid repetition of the senseless slaughter to which their direction had given rise. one such was Field-Marshal Montgomery-Massenburg, whose immediate response report was the block his dissemination throughout the army. * while looking under an assistant which would make it possible for one man to operate such censorship, the precise reason for his behavior is by no means of scare. in the lane as he then was proud deceased-massenburg was adopted adopted later print sees happened to be chief of staff of the fourth division during the battle the Somme.

our second examples rather more complex, concerning as it does that major obstacle to military development, but force. as the noble death

__________________________________________

* and abridged version was subsequently issued to headquarters of company squadrons and batteries ³

115

uncomprehending factor in military incompetence, this animal is much in evidence between wars.

upon reflection, is hardly surprising to horse became the st. paul non-of military life. per thousand years man found in innocent manages. it was nothing better for transportation and load hauling. forces raise morale and enhanced egos. forces took the weight off the enable people to go to war sitting down. when they lay down you can hide behind them. one was called you could borrow for all their wants, when they died you can eat them!

because it traditionally oral organs so many army officers in military families, horsemanship in the context of sports like hunting became one of the preferred leisure activities. since such sports is below, painstaking and in an earlier age, johnston only act out symbolic aspects of real or fair bar also associated with a higher social class, there is little wonder that they should find so much favor with those who chose the army is a career. the one all, it is not surprising to the calvary became the branch the army with the high status. forces surprising that they should have come the most be limited in denunciation of the tank, with missing as an old intrusive junior rather than air apparent".

the forces surprising the desire of the war office to placate the calvary with stranger on urban logic. not only did the veto any expansion of the tank or not, under direction montgomery massenburg, ruled that the new tank brigade should never be was reassembled, and this in the mid-1930s with hitler on density. such resistance to progress, in the face of gathering evidence as to german intentions, was not confined to serving Soldiers. during a common today to 1934, the labor and he for lee, mr. tinker, and sincerity to question the value of war scout. hardly any finished speaking the conservative and pete, brigadier making, spurred to the attack. having kut down the unfortunate mr. tinker, the brigadier concluded with use of the immortal words: " there must be no tinkering with calgary!"it seems unlikely that his weight was even deliberate.

forces also read their heads in army estimates. when happy coincidence, british army needs for 1935 to 36 published on the same day the hitler announced that his will peacetime will army would comprise 36 divisions. to meet this threat montgomery massing for

116

decided the amount spent on 4-h for forces should be increased from 44,000 lbs. to 100,000 lbs., and this in contrast to do some promoter fuel, which he considered should be raised from 12,000 lbs. to 121,000 lbs..

presumably to justify the rage, while the same time making amends for having mentioned petrol, the same field marshal lay down debt and future officer should be provided with two horses, and that forces should be provided for officers of the royal tank corps, presumably and a prophylactic role.

it would be unfair to suggest that the cips was alone in this romantic behavior. other shared his prejudices. just below the service was another voice no less reactionary hardly less influential, adult sir philip jet would, commander-in-chief india very despite the print success of tanks in the northwest frontier, this whole caliber been made surprising announcement pronouncement that the army in india would be unlikely to adopt tanks for a very long time, and then only to keep up the momentum of four-story x-men smart even more remarkable was his response to rumor that the germans had invented in armor piercing missile -- inventories over all-pro bullet * instead of greeting this vote news " with ramona, concern, jet would reacted like a schoolboy who just been told there will be no more lasted is because the school books had been destroyed in a classroom fire. here at last was agreeable evidence that he would be a waste of time to replace tanks with forces forces with tanks. the fact of worse presented a large and easily penetrated target to all descriptions of bullets, let alone the how corps ultra, conveniently escaped his notice.

no less forceful worship indication of general edmonds, chief of the military branch of the historical section of the committee of imperial the pants. having considered all the evidence, he wrote: " any tank which shows its nose wheel in my opinion be knocked out -- the worst you practically l. heart bracket and fuller imagine our past. for all this implied in version of the real chronology of military technology is surprising to say the least.

i hopes of armor piercing bullets, the military establishment, according to the l. heart, said store by the professed love of worse, backed up by citibank concepts as a carrying over into war of noble deeds on hunting field in the part which forces

_______________________________________________________

* according to live l. heart, this rumor was a deliberate blocking the part of Germany.

117

plaguing the training and young officers. not everyone saw quite like this. as an observer mark: " a little dolores and hunting scenes to blunt all their reasoning faculties. while the others, taking conscience of the fact that horses suffer terribly in war, have noted the curious paradox did those who professed to grace lovell forces should be very ones with least regard for their welfare.

as for the ledge benefits of hunting, dr. cooper, though fond of the sport, take issue with the proposition to its sharp in the mind. in this experience, most hunting people were not particularly quick way. in his opinion, driving a car down the great west road was aquino testified this a decision in anything encountered in the hunting field.

one be wrong to suppose this Soldierly regard for forces was confined to britain and. before the second world war. according to general patton, the saddest day in his life is when watches low-calorie get marked by the last time in stacked or sabers, well as recently as 1960 general hackett observed cop:"it is unfortunate that almost total disappearance of the requirement for a quotation s. and military skills should have been thought to justify its abandonment as an aid to education of the officer... the growing technical complexity of war and the cannon circumstances of the battlefield have driven out the worst but they have also developed increasing requirement for balancing element in officers education which application amply provides."i

Do could take exception to the sentiments. No one would deny that horses are more lovable than tanks and require a greater sense of balance. What is extraordinary is that the love of horses should have apparently nullified any apprehension regarding immense in Germany during interwar period, and the way it is equanimity was sustained by the military establishment up to the 11th hour. Thus even in 1938 when the main preoccupation is a new CG CIPS, Lord Gore, was how to get rid of Major General bar, the specialist intent warfare. The movement war office, where he was Director military training, pull bar was eventually packed off to command a mobile division in Egypt. It was a case of out of the frying pan into the fire. The TRC Egypt, General court in the lesson, was another who do not believe in tanks. He agreed Hobart with,"I don't know what you come here for, and I don't issue anyway." ⁶

Relating to these advance was at one other agreement ingredient a military incompetence

118

Which can simple or in the 1930s -- deception, of self and others. A particular instance concerned that other great legacy of the first world war -- airpower. Between 1914 in 19 air team 18 arrow points have been using considerable success by both sides are constant, ground support and bombing sorties. At the time it seemed obvious that airpower would be decisive factor in future wars. Thanks to civilian enthusiasts in private industry to design performance of aircraft to improve rapidly from year-to-year. With no powerful engines and stronger airframes and greater ( and more accurate ( firepower and uncaring capacity. But for the Army and Navy the notion of military aircraft route little of busy hasn't, while that of the REI is an independent junior service was complete and Acoma.

For once the usual rivalry between the ultimate old arms sank beneath their mutual dislike of the new upstart. If anything, the admirals waxed rather more negative about airplanes than did the generals, whose minds, as Mason, or or a distant fitted by the issue of tank. As mechanization threatened forces, so aircraft written battleships. But unlike courses and military minds, now ships for only the last of the secession of obstacles to progress of naval thinking ground before battleships it in good, and before that sail,. Each revolution and transition hidden bitterly resented, Everly opposed, and productive of such irrational thinking as to curb and deeply dearly loves objects have to be renounced. When there was talk of iron replacing wood in the construction of ships one and was heard to market I was per pot idea was preposterous. Since I was very urban water ships would be down to sank excavation mark on this issue it has been calculated at

Of the 20 major technological developments which lie between the first Mmrine engine and the Polaris subletting, the adults in machine had to scourge, delay, obstructed or positively rejected 17. Essential unnecessary incorporation in these developments in the structure of modernization has been seen by individual and sometimes on discipline officers, by political and industrial pressures, or -- and most pregnant -- by the successful adoption in rival navies. Seven *

Abstract is fair to an outback, by allowing other navies to experiment with new technologies, the British tax payer was saying considerable expense.

119

as for battleships, whose future usefulness and, indeed, there very existence was threatened by the advent of aircraft:

... To most admirals to respective value battleships and aircraft was not basically technological issue but more in the nature of the spiritual issue. They care is to bow fleet with a religious fervor, as an article all believed to find all scientific examination. A blindness of hardheaded cylinders sailors to realities that were obvious to dispatch would dispassionate observer is only inexplicable through understanding the placed " ships of the line will be old in their hearts. A battleship had long been to an adult what a cathedral is to a bit of a bishop. ⁸

It was such strong emotional attachments that led the admirals to deceive their political masters. * the practical issue was whether or not battleships to defend themselves against aircraft. Having to the opinion that they could, the adults he decided to this point. In 1936 ( well aircraft production by the Axis powers was getting a top-tier (, because invited to a demonstration in which naval ships would attempt to shoot down a radio controlled all we equal target aircraft. Unfortunately demonstration to not go well. Despite affected upon Muslim into 280 mph and flew progress of provocatively up-and-down without joking, while the ships were given relatively were given a running start on parallel course, thereby reducing speed differential to something approaching 50 mi. an hour, not hit was scored. Dismayed that resourceful, the admirals played their last card, deliver the crash in the radio controlled plane into the sea -- thereby will prove" a considerable cost of British taxpayer the planes are no match for battleships when these are in the right hands.

Well we are on the subject of naval problems, it seems the deception as practiced by the adults he was a rather different order from that Manas bested by the war office. Although theoretically advantage by having to the quite literally on the ground, the military establishment displayed a quality of self deception ( as opposed to deliver deception of other's ( far in excess of that practiced by the Navy, pool, beneath their Morphin plastic protestations, did on occasion show any

____________________________________________

* the low standard of those RAF aircrew who made at the fleet air on, the refusal of the RAF to develop a dive bomber, and fair of Kuts and Navy estimates were other contributory factors. (personal communication from Donald McIntyre.) night

120

Surprising streak of realism, postured perhaps by the age-old experience of being up against the hard facts of nature -- and the dangerously low poignancy of the human body.

This this contrast between the total obscurantism of the Army and underlying realism the Navy is typified by the case of most apparent in 1935 worsening relations with Italy and put the British fleet in Malta and serious risk of sudden air attack. Lacking your completed Pearl Harbor six years or later they were attempting target for an enemy very Army reactions is situation or typified by a letter to the hard from Sir Philip Kenwood, commander-in-chief India, whose vision on tanks we considered earlier.

He wrote: "you have evidently think land out, as I fear that both the government and the public at Hometown, by the air propaganda... There is only one way in which the air can we will or and that is by bombing women and children; and that will never bring a great nation to its knees, but only inferior people. You knoll perfectly well the teenage laughs at the air now. They have got protected decks, and with their blisters and multiple machine guns and multiple antiaircraft guns, they do not fear them in the slightest"can

However, notwithstanding the polled encouragement of far off, landlocked Sir Philip, the Admiralty, for all its protestations as to the invisibility of battleships, promptly and band in Malta will for fear of what it hadn't figured ". As the Del Hart said, it was remarkable how quickly the sea lowered the will to reality in swallow the previously disdainful views about the effect of airplanes.

In later years, particularly after disasters in 1940, it became fashionable among risers and cartoonist he ridicule upon the military leaders of this unhappy era. In fact they were the victims of three factors, at least two of which -- the economy and public attitudes to war, -- were beyond their control.

The third factor, as discussed later chapters, the something endemic to the military profession -- the overcontrol of aggression. It is epitomized in Boyle's description of free service chiefs as suffering from will meet your resoluteness", 19 best start its description of the same man as " this amiable 30".

I do not become clichés of the military cynical, one might wonder at the paradox which these epithets represent, for here were three professional in violence, ask top of their calling, doing their

121

Level best to deny the forthcoming clash of bonds and it apparently Pentagon sacrificing military preparedness for fear of offending their colleagues. Yes, and a nervous tendency to safeguard their own reputations by sitting tight in doing nothing ( but waged talisman of hallowed tradition is to were often holocaust (, seems strange, disable least.

What makes the nation of this landing like behavior has been given by divine. He draws attention to the interesting fact that in the field munitions technology called the tip of the sort " has always had to be blunted. A new gun is build bigger and more powerful than its predecessors but its barrel left on rifle; aircraft carriers are devolved equipped with hopelessly slow and obsolete aircraft; bombers are made with piano downloads; bonds are turned out with insufficient explosive power; gigantic " armor piercing " naval shells break up on impact asked her. Always the tip is left blunted. It is tempting see a parallel between these phenomena in the tendency to provide your outgrowth armies with commanders like Elphinstone, Ragland, Simpson, polar and French, made his forte it was to blunt the sort of mast aggression. Presently we shall discussed a fuller implication of this clue to military incompetence. The first there's another war to consider.*

_________________________________________________

* much to the relief of the German mania javelin.

But your answer is inadequate generalship. The army commander, Major General Neil Ritchie, a fine looking man, has been described by his contemporaries in way strikingly reminiscent of Elphinstone, Ragland and Buller:

Ritchie was all haywire by then. All for counterattacking in this direction one day and another the next. Optimistic and try not to believe that we had taken a knock. What reported to stay at first armored division to him at a time when I was planning to use it for counterattack, he flew to see me and almost at the view that I was being subversive. What (General Meservey)

General Ritchie had a great air decisiveness, it was really rather indecisive. ( General Goodwin Austin ( to deceased according to the same core commander,"bracket key bracket and tendency to ask your vice and having received acting opposite way " (

Which he is not sufficiently quickwitted or imaginative. ( Major General Borman -- Smith in a report to General can lack (

A fine robust looking man with German manner, but no or or. ( general grandstand (

Confident and decisive in his speech, but one did not always feel he was quite so confident and decisive in his mind. ( general miss survey ( to

For an example of this indecision, reminiscent of that shown 100 years earlier by elf in stone before the treat the retreat from couple ran cynical:

I got vehicle or an order,: no account was L.L. Bean to be evacuated -- you were to fight it out to the lax. It was already

126

Surrounded. I was told by no rain did these were the Army commanders personal orders. Then I had a message: it might be evacuated if I thought he couldn't be held. I said it was quite sure he cannot be held for long; it was told to pass his message on 2.9 Brigade. Then again another word -- the Army commanders says it must be held. Then yet another: that he was to be evacuated at the Brigade to get out. A test is on two Dennis Reed break bracket the Brigadier bracket, and they got out. This was an example of what was happening all the time. The deceased general miss survey) ³

Under the ineffectual leadership of this big, kindly, courteous, I imaginative, apparently complacent it occasionally touchy general, the Army suffered decline in organization, discipline and arise. It became both lab he instead of tot, sluggish instead of a child".

Once again that fatal amalgum of overconfidence and over an underestimation of the enemy produced a dulling of military endeavor. Well in the military headquarters there was a comfortable assurance to the bracket Rommel bracket to be dealt with leisure, and was down to surrender. " for partly through inadequate intelligence (in the military since the were) and partly through an inherent distaste for Sumter huge, the Army command him on themselves to be duped by the proxy antics of the other side. On hampered by similar in ambitions,: professional and invented from necessity, normal comment, yet secession of paints, outflank loose, pitcher movements and encircled its, brand rings around his more powerful, honest courageous, but stole it is saw little movie adversary.

Well yourself, in his diary, described his success to the British election for frontal assault -- prayed cost the charges by small groups in which the attackers bang their heads time and time again against all down German answers.

This bullheaded approach, which whittled down the reserves of British tanks and 400 to a mere 170, was made worse by the policy ascending in the armor. Piecemeal, in " any packets,"-- a further example that curious pulling punches so avid in previous campaigns.

Another, more specific, reason for the disaster, which, if often lack had not held the Germans at Alameda, might have lost Britain the Middle East oil supplies and therefore the war, has been suggested -- the superiority of German and 19 guns the British solid shot

127

two pounders, which were in its and incapable of penetrating the armor of the latest German tanks, study said contrast to the 50mm and 76mm (captured Russian guns) which to Germans appealed.

According to the hard this discrepancy between German and British antitank potential need not have been had had we taken a hit from the almost use of 88 mm anti-aircraft guns as anti-tank weapons. This argument may be question onto Councilman: 1st, are excellent 3.7 in. and 19 guns did not, for technical reasons, lend itself like the 88 to antitank role; second, those 3.7 is been available were more urgently needed in the role for which they had been designed.

From the standpoint human behavior, human feelings, leadership and decision-making, events of 1942 North Africa exemplified in microcosm the major causes military and confidence. Underneath is robust exterior, Ritchie, like polar before him and else is tumbled for him, lack self-confidence and see more concerned with proving himself to himself none of proseKuting the war. The presiding over in general minimal folk committee meetings " through which the Army was Won, the seeking a vice in the not taking it, and the disingenuous way in which managed to convince commander-in-chief that he was protecting to report to rock while reality leaving it to the mercy of the Germans, on the actions of the man beset by inner doubts. These downs were skillfully but not perfectly concealed by his often inappropriate decade a monumental complacency. His relationship talking like he stood as rental turtles to the Winston -- the weeks on to the powerful father -- one minute constantly refusing to take sensible vice after ( because to do so would be committee's dependency (, the next anxiously seeking guidance and reassurance.

Wonder then that Ritchie remained unfettered by the stolid and archaic attitudes of the military organization in which he rose to juncture, an organization in which, to " one contemporary historian " cleverness at the, push, ruthlessness, self-interest in ambition were considerably less prized than modesty, good manners, courage bracket and bracket a sense of duty"; five of an Army described the commander-in-chief, general often lack, as " to rigid and lacking in flexibility to be really adaptable to the conditions of modern quick moving

__________________________________

*e.g., that the Army should fight as it had been trained, in divisions and not in bits and pieces.

128

warfare in the desert, or even elsewhere called. Six on June 25 19.2, which he was relieved of his command. * to abrupt was a disaster

Tobruk was a disaster, but, in terms of human misery, not have so great as one which had unfolded a few months earlier, and another theater of the war.

_________________________________________

* in considering what has been said by others about Ritchie, including those comments reproduced here, and must be emphasized that this otherwise and subsequently highly competent officer was, by being appointed to command and Army in the middle of a battle, more sinned against the ensuing.

That's when the Malay Tribune published the news the Japanese transports had been citing off the southern tip of Indochina, the editor was immediately castigated by commander-in-chief of the Far East, Air Chief Marshal Sir Brooke-Popham, who said: " I consider it most improper to print such alarmist views at a time what the present... The position isn't have to assume serious as the Tribune makes it out. "

The form of his complaint is not without interest. Firstly, he did not deny the truth of the press release. Yardley code, since it originated in a report by Reuters which had been passed by the sensor in which undoubtedly was true. Secondly, he managed to plot all-in-one drafted the state situation was both not serious and yet likely because war. This is Carus, for the close proximity of Japanese forces was not serious and why should I truth or report to this effect be alarming question mark moreover, if it was alarming, because true, they must the been serious, in which case the sooner the civilian population nobody, and can learn to just a minute danger was threatened them, the better.

Finally, his words exemplify the Tendancy, seen all too often, to talk down to a civilian population as a group pool, Tucson weakness of intellect or lack of moral fiber, could not be trusted with information held by their elders and patterns.

The causes of this arrogance are not hard to see. By devoting information unprofessional in group may feel that is losing some of its mystique, thereby leaking its image in the isotope of its public, and this will this loss will be great greatest precisely when the in group is most at a loss as to what to do next.

The behavior may be likened to that of doctors are nurses who having taken a patience temperature, insist on keeping is interesting information to themselves. The rest of solid facts, the patient has to be satisfied with a condescending smile and a patronizing will don't worry, will soon have the open about again. " needless to say, this preservation of a mystique will be strongest in the more immature and less self-confident members of been in group.

The guardians of Singapore will prime exemplars of this motivation. After long history of wrong thinking that cannot afford to become mistaken. The more events proven to be wrong, the

133

Stronger their defenses became begin submitting this to be the case. Like is secure doctors, be covered their refusal to disclose to true facts in two ways. These were in the nature of Tendancy is, one for themselves, the other for the patience -- in this case the civilian population of Singapore. It's for themselves and had the rationalization the disclosure of the true facts would be bad for civilian morale; and further " patients ", they supplied falls information.

Thus a commander-in-chief went on record as saying, albeit is hopelessly inadequate collection of obsolete aircraft: "we can get on all right with the Buffaloes [known to members of the Singapore flying club as "peanut specials"] here. They're quite good enough for millennia."

This particular inaccuracy seems to have been the product of stupidity, arrogance and dishonesty. Its arrogant in its underestimation of these yet fighting force, stupid in the wrong prognosis of its effects on the Singapore civilians, and dishonesty in that even a man like Brook pop them could hardly every strike of air Chief Marshal without knowing something about the aircraft under his command.

As Hitler's administration demonstrated, in a starkest form, suppression of the truth involves two procedures: on the one he and censorship, on the other digital communiques. The high command of Singapore employed both measures. Take the were today released to the Malay tribune a bear two months before Singapore capitulate. It reads:

We are ready. We have had plenty of warning and our preparations are made in tested... We are confident. Our defense is a strong in our weapons efficient. Whatever are erased... We have one team in one only, it is defend these shores, to destroy such of our enemies as we sit flood on our soil... One of our enemy for summer we see before us to Japan trained for years by the exhausting claims of her walking on slot on China... The so remember that we here in the Far East form part of the great campaign in the world of truth and justice and freedom.

As the editor the Tribune said, it was hard to believe that any pity could deliberately tell so many allies.

It is that disappointed one encounters a curious paradox. In our culture is not more serious to choose a man of dishonesty then

134

this

Of stupidity. The former is the individuals will fall ", the latter no more usable than is the linked of his feet. To accuse man of dishonesty is considered libelous, to accuse them of stupidity only on time or at the worst abusive. Yet these men at the very eight Exeter military careers opted for the most transparent of deceptions.

And maybe thought that all this is being unduly unsure rubble,; that they were hopelessly list misled by the serious shortcomings of their intelligence services; that when General Percival issued use communiques he generally if mistakenly believed their contents. Unfortunately this top offices does not stand up.

On Monday, December 8, 1941, she HQ issued its first war communique. This stated that the Japanese had failed in their attempt to land that code a barroom. This was all shortly after by a second communique which stated: oh all surface craft are retiring at high speed, and a few troops left on the beach being heavily machine gun."

Naturally this was heartening news for Singapore is less well-informed civilians. As mobile Arbor points out: oh it was not difficult for them to imagine ( because this of course was what they wanted to imagine and this of course was what their military commanders wanted them to imagine ( a moonlit beach, with a field taxi clad Japanese lefty Willard to their fate by cowardly comrades or bolting " at high speed call in their boats ". One ( might at Alex. (

In fact communicate was essentially untrue and liberally misleading. Within the space of a few hours in the time the Japanese landing, code a bar route was firmly in enemy hands. Having deposited their assault troops, the Japanese trend ports did quite naturally returned bases fast as possible -- here was the grain of truth which GH you distorted for their own hands.

After this point the impression may have been given to stupidity, opposite see an wrong decisions were the prerogative of Army commanders. This was not so was amply demonstrated by the Navy. The first start, Naval Chiefs had been the forefront of those responsible for the fact the Japanese the Singapore sold defenses were some text, see were facing 15 inch guns, backed up by a number of 9 inch guns for each of which their only 30 rounds of ammunition -- and after one round per done per day for a month.

But there was worse to follow. As a desperation measure, two battleships, the Prince of Wales and Repulse, were said to Singapore to create an 11th hour presence. There were under the command of at Moser, Phillips, in the words of one who met him " a real old see Donald Lofton top ". Unfortunately he to lack sufficient per space acidly. Despite strong warnings that he could not expected adequate air cover, he was soon off with his two ships will in search of trouble ". At first all wet wells ship steamed sweet reassuring the up the East Coast.

In pursuing this course of action and Phillips turn the proverbial blind eye to a second warning which reached them. This state quite categorically: " fighter protection... Will now, the not, the possible ". He felt safe because the weather was bad disguise overcast. But then, place suddenly, the skies cleared. With plaster produced the annual turn to ships and signal Singapore the river burning to banks. This was the last was ever heard from them.

136

Tisch it seems that on his return journey he received a port (subsequently proved false) the Japanese had launched attack on the town of one can. Without informing Singapore he decided to will go in and help ". It was a fatal decision. He ships responded by the Japanese Air Force, torpedoed in some of loss to a loss of 840 officers and men. By all accounts those was a brave and conscientious offer officer. But his brain this bordered on full hardiness and his errors of judgment not only had a devastating effect on that which terrorist that much cherished can on commodity, the morale to Singapore civilians, but also sealed the fate of their city. Now there was nothing left which to protect it. Naturally was worse to ask how can a man so excellent in some aspects some respects but so limited in others ever could have recently decision to inflict such grievous loss upon his fellow countrymen?

So much for the Navy. In their chosen field the senior command of the aria it could themselves little better. Is sortie been seen how air Chief marshal Popham broke Popham underestimate shaft underestimated Japanese Japan's air strength in comparison with his own eels sorted group of obsolete aircraft. This same 63-year-old author, whose most noble characteristic was a tendency to follow sleep on the slightest pretext, showed such disastrous residency and in decision in his capacity as Commander in Chief that has official history was moved to state: oh it is possible that he did not fully realize the importance is speed... The need for a quick decision was not apparently realize that headquarters Malaya command. "

But it was in the matter of Japanese air raids to aria command deep first clear demonstration of its limitations. Although the inevitability of air raids must have been obvious for sometime, the first night rate was marred by complete absence of blackout or night fighters and this despite the fact that, as air Chief Marshal Maltby was later to admit, the RA asked at a clear 30 minutes warning of the approaching aircraft. It seems to Japanese they committed the unfortunate faux pas of attacking at night: unforgiving because he conflicted with the official dogma the Japanese were unable to fly their planes during the hours of darkness. This particular idea fix a cost Singapore 61 did in honor and 33 injured.

But the recklessness of the admirals in the dithering of the air marshals Perez nothing to do to to the did in transducer the general spirit is seen the nothing could moved in, not even the pleading other fellow officers. As mobile Arbor says in his book, sinister twilight:

137

In Brigadier Simpson, the Chief engineer, which to see Major General Gordon Bennett print sees commanding the eight Australian division, he found it impossible to make them realize that there was an urgent need for antitank defenses. " at first he did not wish to discuss the matter at all, " Simpson noted after demeaning. Simpson was were far. Could not be Australian general understand that there was nothing on the long road to prevent the enemy reaching Joe or? Apparently Gordon Bennett could not, for in his very the night before he wrote, " Malaya command sent Brigadier Simpson to discuss the be the creation of antitank obstacles for use on the road... Personally I have little time for these obstacles... Preferring to stop and destroyed tanks with antitank weapons."

The wonder the Japanese never slow down, no wonder of the time after time... Troops were annihilate by skillful Japanese enveloped in tactics. When the British to decide wrong decisions were made. Communications broke down... Whole pockets of troops were cut off. The first Japanese a tanks appeared and vote came as a great surprise " to the British would not one single tank in Malaya. In the jungle country were the British had insisted tanks could never operate, the Japanese tanks moved easily between the spacious rose of rubber trees. ²

Major General Gordon Bennett was not, to use the appropriate vernacular, and isolated pocket of resistance nor did hold the record of Ops fancy. In Barber's words: " temps tracked by Brigadier Simpson bracket to improve in and to defenses have been balked at every turn, largely by General Percival who seem to a fixation against such measures... Nothing in been done, nothing was being done despite many previous police. "

A hazard of long-range many rigidly authoritarian hierarchical organization is the ", from time to time, the individual, out of dire necessity or from strong personal conviction, feels compelled to apply pressures to those above them. Is a hazard, because the those of the organization, whether be a Victorian family, and English boarding school or the British Army, the man's pressure always amusing one-way only, downwards rather than upwards. To buck the system, by prodding those above, can have unpleasant consequences.

Percival before WWII

Use it is a measure of the seriousness from which Brigadier

138

Simson regarded the situation to the made one last attempt to move his General.

He joined the Raven announced that he would like to take this opportunity of art are talk on the subject to defenses. Percival looked to tribal style but sat down with a tired expression and listened. The General was a difficult man to "warmup". Tall, thin, with super treating teeth, he was a completely negative personality and his first instant when faced with the problem was it couldn't be done -- in direct contrast to Simson news for balked was always " well "let's try." this was why Simson had elected to stay and risk all at the strange meeting in the deadline, and now he spoke with the passionate eloquence of the professional. Defenses were his job main job. He believed implicitly in their value which history entropy Lee proved in modern war. And yet all the materials to hand... He had to staff the materials, he said the Percival, the throw a fixed in semi-permanent defenses, and I think defenses, underwater obstacles, firetraps, mines, anchored but floating barbed wire, methods of looming the water at night... To Brigadier's dismay, the Percival refused his advice. ³

It seems to Simson was passed taking no for an answer, for he said to the General: " Sir -- I must emphasize the urgency of doing everything to help or troops. There often only partially trained, there's tired in spirit. They been retreating for hundreds of miles. And please remembers costs are, the Japanese are better trained, better equipped, and their inspired by unbroken run of victories... And has to be done now, sir... Once to air it comes in the fire, civilian labor will vanish."

The plate was forceful, respectful and logical but, amazingly, the General remained unmoved. Simpson, his anger rising, said: go look here, General -- I've races question time after time. You've always refused. What's more, if only first used to give me any recent spirit at least only one thing -- why on earth are you taking the stand?"

At long last to general officer commanding the way it gave his answer. "I believe the defenses of the sort you want to throw up are bad for the morale of troops and civilians."

As Barber comments: "Simson was probed frankly horrified" and remember standing there in the room suddenly feeling quite cold, and

139

realizing that, except for a miracle, Singapore was as good as lost. As he put on the stand around, Simpson could not for bear to make one last remark --"Sir, it's going to be much worse for morale at the Japanese start running all over the island "."

Percival during the debacle of Singapore

To most people, Percival's excuse for refusing the request of his chief engineer must seem to logical, disabled least. This a lower an airmen's morale to give them a parachute or a householder to stop a burglar a lock for his front door?

Barber has interesting footnotes on this issue: " why was general Percival so biased about defensive works? Simpson believes that, like some other commanders Himalayas were indifferent, folks somewhere in their military education such a dictum on morale had been impressed upon them or the possibly miss understood the true value defenses in the circumstances such as now existed. " ⁴

Is certainly not beyond the bounds possibility. It but if so, why should a proper emphasis on the ports of morale during the teaching of other officers become an irreversible, on modified, conditioned reflex for every subservient subsequent situation however inappropriate? And why Al should commanders is the notion the defenses? After all, it does not really require any unusual feed of intellect to appreciate that is more difficult walk to Barb wire and across open country, than any held about why are renting the dishes becomes easier target than one without these impediments to progress, what is he should to repel waterborne invasion made under cover of darkness if the attacking forces can be blinded and illuminated by search lights?

With other observation by Barbara points up another curious feature of these phenomena and shows that they were by no means confined to the Singapore will campaign ". When for collection that was Secretary of War he visited the EF the 1939 and was aghast at the lack of defense works, and plainly showed his annoyance, with a result according to a starry of December 2, 1939, will Ironside CID has after his visit to be a half came steaming and with great emphasis told me that the officers were most upset of the criticisms made about lack of defenses... He said court was writing to do is not to resign. " by

It seems an inability to understand the value of defense was sorely not because many indifference to criticism. There's also sobering implication even the chief of the Imperial General staff evidently regarded the lack of defenses is rather less important

140

Each in the fact military feelings had been hurt. Kennedy did somewhere in the minds of some professional military commanders to Larson Nash rolled the distaste for defensive responses were to mark

Defensive, as opposed offense of, responses rank low in military esteem. Defensive activity is protective, womanly, one might almost a maternal. In sacks, to use a particular trike that opposite metaphor, is a male who penetrates a fortress of the female; he is the attacker, she is the defender. For the male to carry out elaborate preparations for his own safety is to some extent in a minute, an admission of weakness. For the male who is doubts about his own guerrilla, whose life in choice of career are governed by unconscious doubts about his own masculinity and set a sexual adequacy, such in family activities maybe and have them out. The same token is possible there is an affinity between the behavior of the generals in Singapore and refusal on the part of male industrial workers to wear protective clothing, ear plugs and the like.

_______________________________________

* in both cases there is perhaps the feeling that is on masculine to defend yourself one South, the by so doing what appears to be assisting.

In the case of Percival Gordon Bennett, to rack defenses with them into admit to themselves the danger which they stood. In other words, they're perfect inside professed anxiety about civilian morale was really displaced from signee about their own morale. Looking further into the story of Singapore was struck by the compulsive element in his refusal to military to defend itself. Such compulsive behaviors typical menu present and authoritarian personality and ARCO reared " in an organization would traditionally deals with the or endangered by ritualistic means"-- " poll", drill, parades, except her combo devices are confounded aggression exhibiting ritual and display in many animals, their purpose being to keep interest PCs aggression within pounds. Contemplation of instant actual mechanisms in lower animals suggest yet another contributor you reason for the behavior of these jurors the inefficient general. It is that of helpless in resignation in the face of overwhelming same species aggression. Whereas the brown rat, the most ferocious of fighters, will turn and attack any large predator, it makes no such attempt to defend itself against concerted attack by fellow rats. Under the circumstances

______________________________________________________

* according to Donald McIntyre, the deficit so many gunnery officers in the Royal Navy is to the fact they think it unmanly to wear your plugs ⁶

141

The alien rat which has unwittingly and fringed in territorial rights of another column he lets itself to beached to warn to shreds rather than fight back

Addison level such behavior could well be part and parcel of appeasement tendencies. Courting the Conrad Blair or lands these rich lies behavior patterns with distaste constitute appeasement gestures and involved in a large variety of animals as the ultimate defense against the otherwise lethal effects of interest PCs aggression. In trying to appease another member of the same species, General does everything to avoid stimulating its aggression. A kick lead for example, he lists aggression in another by displaying its colors, unfolding it spins are spreading its deal covers to exhibit its body contours as fully as possible. If the same fish and wishes to pieces superior pony it does exactly the opposite: it goes pale, drowsiness bands, displays the narrow side of its body and moves slowly, skillfully, literally stealing away all aggression eliciting stimuli.

The tendancy to appease, to "turn the other cheek", looms large in human affairs, whether in the "love your enemies" sense of Christian teaching or in the bowing of subordinates to their superiors, that there is no reason to suppose it does not also occur in certain sorts of military commanders when confronted by such seemingly hopeless odds and fighting far from home

But to continue to story: shortly after his conversation with Simson, General Percival was visited by the Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in the Far East, General Sir Archibald Wavell. On this incident wobble road that he didn't " very much taken that nothing had been done " and, " speaking some ass. He ", demanded to know why. Percival gave the same answer but he'd given to Simpson: to preserve civilian morale. Wave over toward that it would be very much worse for morale to troops on the Peninsula were driven back onto the island.

The upshot is encounter was a directive from Churchill giving detailed instructions and how defend the North Shore. The measures listed were precisely those to the advocated by Simson. But despite these pressures, transmitted to him via wobble, Percival still do nothing. When he eventually issued a planning was are ready to Lake, the necessary civilian labor was no longer available.

On the disposition of his forces Percival sinking see no less deranged. The other men hold a force in reserve the could be rushed quickly to wear the Japanese eventually chose to land, he decided

142

To spread is troops thinly over Longmont. In other words, he decided now will because it would be good for morale will just exactly what he refused to do earlier because it would be bad for morale. In his " battle of Singapore will order of the day, Percival may great player phrases like " the enemy within our Gates ", " lose stock "" rumor monger" count, RELATED to alarm civilians ( for factor virtually was no fit column (. In this from the man who had laid much stress on the importance of civilian morale.

With us. Barbara rights: " and all the catalog of ineffectual leadership... Nothing is quite so puzzling as the virtual absence of any detail and action during the last purchase hours of daylight before the Japanese attack... Is hard to believe the modern General could so easily ignore was happening around them." ⁷

By this time, and to everyone, including label, predicted quite correctly the Japanese attack would come from the Northwest. There were good reasons for this prediction, however, Percival immediately ordered the vast toward quantities of defense to worship be shifted from the Northwest to the northeast corner of Singapore, turn this despite the fact that reconnaissance is shown there were insuperable obstacles to attack in the northeast.

However, having the stores the northeast Percival then learned that the enemy was massing in the Northwest. He probably order all stores moved back again. But by now it was again to Lake.

For the Allies was week of chaos and confusion on the lead by any vestiges of competent generalship. Thanks in the absence of defenses, including of prior to use a search lights which have been assembled to blindly targets of the attackers as a prattle their way across to Joe Horst rights, the Japanese landed almost unmolested. Despite a devastating garage and Japanese artillery, this guns, instead of counting the enemy's point of embarkation, remained new, awaiting orders it never chain. Despite the weeks of warning, Allied ground forces were speedily outflank, encircled, caught off or routed.

In all this, Percival's want of journals that had this on the boss: " it seems evident, dwell Percival paid lip service to the need to team time, he failed to take the only step which might have enabled him to do so. I defenses been constructed interwar in December and early January, there might well have been a chance for Singapore

143

to survive for sufficient time for the Australian Air Force and its reinforcements from the Middle East to arrive. The

In the event 138,708 British, Indian and Australian Soldiers either died or went into captivity.

With all the in Smith's instances of military incompetence considered in his book, it is the Paula Singapore which most clearly gives the lie to the so-called "bloody fool" theory of military ineptitude. Percival was in fact highly intelligent and showed himself in previous years to be a bright staff writer

Arnhem

"All be accumulated evidence confirms that, like Gallipoli, this was a British disaster where naked courage lacked the bodyguard of competent planning, competent intelligence, competent technology. Yet wars object is victory, not the Victoria Cross, and it was shameful that by autumn 1944 we could still be so amateur"

-- Ronald Lewin

"It began to seem to me to the generals had got us into something they had no business doing."

-- a private Soldier on Arnhem

If it achieved nothing else, "Operation Market-Garden", Montgomery's plan to capture and hold a bridgehead crossed the Rhine in northern Holland, at least demolishes the myth that military incompetence stems from stupidity. For sheer initiative, quickness of mind, fortitude and selfless heroism, the conduct of those who actually fought the battle has never been surpassed. By the same token, the men who planned and administered the operation were probably as intellectually gifted, will trained, professional competent, dedicated and conscientious as any military planners have ever been. Yet the unfolding of "Market-Garden" revealed all the symptoms of high-level military incompetence.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WftY4JUHMo

In its conception, the plan was a high-risk venture which, if it had paid off, might have shortened the war by several months. A secondary feature the plan was that it promised to gratify Montgomery's wish this armies would win the race for Berlin. In the event this secondary incentive took precedence over the first, with calamities results.

The Market-Garden will was a two-stage operation. In the first stage a

145

massive Airborne operation into northern Holland was timed to coincide with the invasion of southern Holland by land forces of British Second Army. In the second stage the paratroops and glider-borne forces of the 1st Airborne Division were to capture and hold the great road bridge at Arnhem while the tanks of second army's XXX Corps raced across the Holland to consolidate their gains. Success depended upon absence of serious enemy resistance in the Arnhem area; the capture of the bridge before the Germans the time to blow it up or bring up reinforcements; successive ways of airborne reinforcements from England, to back up the initial drop; and, finally, the arrival at Arnhem of XXX Corps within 48 hours of the drop.

The failure of the operation resulted from a concantation of the following factors:

1. As a result of his neglect to open up the port of Antwerp by clearing the Schelde estuary, Montgomery allowed the German 15^th army to escape into northern Holland, where was it available to defend the approaches to Arnhem. [EDITOR: as an engineer Dixon should know that the Canadian Army and 79th Armoured Division with combat engineering devices and amphibious tanks/APCs were taking the western-most and hence soggiest Dutch terrain towards Antwerp as Market-Garden was going on. The point should be why didn't Montgomery ask his brother-in-law, General Hobart for just a few handfuls of swimming tanks/APCs that would have been all he needed to reinforce 1st Airborne and make the operation a success? Dixon suggests egotism here and we concur--we believe Monty didn't want Hobart to get the spotlight again like he had on D-Day where his "funnies" enabled the British to go 7-10 miles inland with light casualties while the foot-slogging, un-mechanized Americans were still stuck on Omaha beach with heavy casualties. We think Monty wanted to win at Arnhem using non-mechanized foot troops seizing bridges to showcase them as not needing tanks, with catastrophic results.]

2. The arrival at Arnhem of XXX Corps depended upon them advancing across 64 miles of enemy-held territory on a 1-tank front along elevated, unprotected highways, flanked by blind by a soft and sodden tank-proof landscape, interspersed with waterways. Any delay -- a blown bridge, an enemy ambush, a blocked road -- and the entire column would be stopped. Any delay and the Germans would have more time to bring up reinforcements. In the event it is hardly surprising that XXX Corps never did reach Arnhem--that they could not achieve even in nine days what had been scheduled to take 48 hours. [EDITOR: XXX Corps DID reach Arnhem 7 days late, Dixon is wrong about this. LVTs of 79th Armoured could also swim and drive across Dutch wetlands, see embedded video documentary]

3. As might have been expected from what is known of English autumns, the mist if not the mellow fruitfullness of an English late September delayed the departure of subsequent gliders and paratroops for the reinforcement of 1st Airborne Division.

4. What "Market-Garden", perhaps more than most military operations, necessitated good communications between the various units and commanders of the attacking force. But here technology failed them. Though it was now 50 years since Marconi had succeeded in sending messages by wireless, the radio sets carried by the invasion force proved useless. Unless within earshot of each other, no one knew what anyone else was doing.

5. Since the Airborne Assault was to take place in daylight, and because it was vital that XXX Corps should complete their journey

146

within 48 hours, the whole enterprise depended upon an absence of strong German forces both in the Arnhem area and on the approach route from the South. Hence it came as something of a jolt when SHAEF received reports from the Dutch underground that two SS panzer divisions which had mysteriously "disappeared" sometime previously had now reappeared almost alongside the drop zone. This information, passed on to Montgomery, received support from British aerial photography of German tanks in the Arnhem area. Meanwhile forward troops of British Second Army reported a buildup of German forces along their intended line of advance.

This was the moment to reassess the risks involved. But since these ugly facts did not accord with what had been planned, they fell upon a succession of deaf years. Taking the lead from Montgomery, who had described the SHAEF report as ridiculous, British Second Army headquarters were quick to discount it also. When one of his intelligence officers showed him the aerial photographs of German armor, General Browning, at first British Airborne HQ retorted: "I wouldn't trouble myself about these if I were you... They're probably not serviceable at any rate". The Intelligence officer was then visited by the Corps medical officer, who suggested he should leave some leave because he was so obviously exhausted. And at First Allied Army HQ, the chief intelligence officer, British Lt. Col., decided there was no direct evidence that the Arnhem area contained "much more than the considerable flak defenses already known to exist". As Ryan puts it: "all down the Allied line of command the evaluation of intelligence on the panzers in Arnhem area was magnificently bungled."

Finally, just in case there were any residual doubts, the intelligence staff of Second Army came up with the reassuring opinion that any German forces in Arhem area "were weak, demoralized and likely to collapse entirely if confronted with a large airborne attack".

"Market-Garden" went ahead-but not quite as planned. Instead of encountering a few old man who collapsed or ran away, 1st Airborne Division fell upon a Hornet's nest of German armor. Far from being demoralized, the enemy fought like tigers to defend the gateway to their homeland. And far from sweeping across Holland to aid the hard-pressed paratroops, the tanks of Second Army's XXX Corps were reduced to a crawl by the combination of unsuitable terrain and a determined opposition.

147

Defeat was absolute and terrible. Short on everything but courage, the men of 1st Airborne Division held on until their numbers had been reduced from 10, 005 to less than a quarter of that figure. Total Allied losses -- in killed, wounded and missing -- exceeded 17,000, some 5, 000 more than those who became casualties on D-Day. Dutch civilian casualties from "Market-Garden" have been estimated at between 500 and 10,000.

Apart from what one American historian has described as a "50-mile salient-- leading nowhere", nothing had been gained beyond a lesson for posterity; though even this had its impact weakened by Field Marshal Montgomery's subsequent description of "Market-Garden grow as a 90% success, a sentiment which drew from Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands to comment: "my country can never again afford the luxury of a Montgomery success". ¹

The student military disasters, the attack on Arnhem ranks with Kut and the Bay of Pigs fiasco (see page 397). Through inappropriate risk-taking, under-estimation enemy, the neglect of unpalatable information and a failure of technology, military decisions by able brains, at high levels of command, brought down misery and chaos.

148

PART TWO

"Its better to struggle with a stallion when the problem is how to hold back, then to urge on a pole which refuses to budge."

--Israeli General Moshe Dyan

149

Author's note

He's because of their juxtaposition, the preceding accounts military disasters may have given the impression that they are typical of military endeavor. This is not so. The very fact that they have provided material for so many books and plays a tested their comparative rarity. The same token, incompetent senior commanders are outnumbered by their competent Bradley. However, as we've seen, military incompetence, what does occur can be immensely costly; which is one annex part of this book was written with no holds barred. Just as a book on cancer cannot afford to be neatly not about malignancy, or gloss over the hazards of carcinogens and dangerous patterns of behavior, still work of military incompetence but not be worth the paper was written on if you do not guilty and expose what is unpleasant. The military incompetence, like cancer, is part of the price paid for complexity. Whatever else does, the analysis of the potential for military incompetence, my dad for cancer, serves to emphasize that most armies and eighties, but most bodies, perform the numerous and difficult functions with some efficiency most the time.

150

Chapter 13

Is there a case to answer?

Not only of completed a survey can covering over 100 years of military mishaps, what conclusions can be drawn regarding the incidence of milititsary incompetence?

In their number of possible answers. Firstly, it could be argued that so-called incompetence of high levels of command is really a pigment of the imagination of vindictive, inaccurate or untruthful historians. In (it might also be argued that if, on rare occasions, some commanders of show minor lapses in their generalship either not matters to be spoken of, let alone made subject to extensive analysis.

A second conclusion might be what seems to have been military incompetence was really due to other, nonmilitary factors, such as governmental stinginess, bigger ease of the weather and sheer padlock.

A fair conclusion might be distance every military action is an uncontrolled experiment, in since he can never be known what would have been the outcome had sued decisions been different, they're amazing almost on the national possibility that things like have been worse, that what was done did represent the least disastrous of possible outcomes open. Many of the costly actions of the First World War fall into this category.

No one would deny a nominal grain of truth in all these propositions. Facts do get distorted in the town. Disasters are indeed more newsworthy than successes. Writers undoubtedly do entertain worse possible picture of their particular bit and wants, many generals have had to contend with the ineptitude, uninformed

151

Interference and stinginess of the political masters, and of course things might have been worse Berry

There are counter-arguments, however. Because they are they are surrogate father figures, people are only too many in anxious to love their admirals and generals, but shuttling time of war. One is only to read Lotus is fabulous channels to realize that even the most outrageous eccentricities ( eccentricities which would not be tolerated in any other walk applied ( are considered in using it not actually in gearing one part and parcel of something Mr. Warner. After all, even surge on French still has his circle of devoted admirers. As Albert asked puts it: " a very large part of military history is written, if not first rest purposes of supporting an Army's authority in prestige, at least with the intention of not hurting, not revealing its secrets, avoiding the betrayal of weakness, desolation or distemper". Historical record of warfare is thus dependent on the writers desire to preserve reputations. ¹

All in all men, the case for maintaining that there is a biased words exaggerating the incidence and extent of military incompetence is perhaps compensated for by some quite contrary tendencies.

Under the circumstances, this book takes the view that certain sorts of incompetence have been an endearing feature of the military scene and amongst the millions of officers and men who have fought to row clean viciously additionally, over often under the most time conditions, there have marched small but influential number was ability has fallen for sure of that required by the positions they held. Two questions and occur. Is there any common pattern to this in incompetence, and, if there is, once does it arise?

It's a first step towards answering these questions less try and summarized data contained in the foregoing chapters. In brief, then, military incompetence involves:

1. A serious wastage of human resources and fair to observe one of the first principles of war -- economy of force. This value to rise in part from the inability to make were swiftly. It also derives from certain attitude to mind which we shall consider presently.

2. A fundamental conservatism and clinging to outworn tradition, and inability to profit from past experience ( owing in part to her refusal to admit past mistakes pregnancies. It also involves a failure to use her tendency to misuse available technology. Stryker

3. A tendency to reject or ignore information which is unflappable or which complex where preconceptions.

152

4. And tendency to underestimate the enemy and overestimate the capability of one's own side.

5. In decisiveness and a tendency to add the gain from the role decision maker.

6. And opposite in persistence any given past despite strong contrary evidence. The

7. A failure to exploit a situation game and a tendency to pull punches rather than push home intact.

8. Failure to make adequate reconnaissance.

9. A per election for funnel salts, often against enemy strongest point.

10. A believe in brute force rather than the clever ruse.

11. A failure to make use of surprise or deception.

Well. An undue rating is to ice skate goes for military setbacks.

13. A suppression or distortion of news in the front, usually rationalize is necessary for morale or security.

14. A believe in mystical forces -- fate., padlock, etc..

Some or all of these several aspects of incompetence have played a significant part and military mishaps considered in earlier chapters.

Release now show they have common etiology and can be understood in terms of complex interaction between the nature of military organizations and certain features of human personality. There way of a starting point less first consider the question of wastage human resources. As we shall see, this perhaps the best single key to all what we need to understand.

On logical if not humanitarian grounds the maintenance of an efficient for should be the first consideration of a military commander. Other qualities of general ship will down than nothing in the as no one left to do dividing. Excess of loss of life in high casualty figures with Air Force and like a likely indicator of military incompetence. In reality to situation is far more complex. Ancestry situations have to be distinguished. Firstly, there are the well-known cases of what seemed to be purely administered of incompetence, as for example in what Lord laugh and has described as the missile all current expedition of 1809. The purpose of this expedition was to attack Antwerp, the troops were in fact that waiting for eight hours on unhealthy walker an island in season. In the event, and owing to the procrastination of military commander, lower chat them, and enable commander,

153

Sir Richard Stratton ( " a Dole hesitate incompetent pair"(, 7000 men died, 14,000 either health permanently ruined and thousands more became ill, mostly from Larry. Only 217 were killed in action. While dying the men were given no attention and little to eat. As laugh in remarks: all sick men were expendable. " ²

The same genre was the appalling wastage and human life in the Crimean war. During his campaign the Army suffered 30% decline his strength through disease, malnutrition and exposure. Before main factors appear to have been ignorance, lack of initiative and inventiveness, killing disregard for the welfare of junior ranks, and the fear of offending higher authority. ( the nearest approach to distant modern times was the bombing incompetence and callous indifference of London Boro counsels to the problem posed by air raids in the blitz of 1940 and 1941 and ascribed to laggard bureaucrats assessed only with their own prestige. ³

A second-class manpower wastage is that involving casualties from enemy action as a result of the incompetent planning a senior military commanders. The men who piercing attack on for we are in the Indian mutiny, the thousands of casualties in the Germans use of gas in 1915, the 13,000 went into captivity following procedure Kut, the hundred 30 casualties in Singapore, the 8500 Americans who died in he our dens offensive of 1944 and a 17,000 British, American and polls Polish were killed wounded or reported missing at RM fall into this category.

There are of course several cases of gross wastage which fallen to both the aforementioned categories. Thus an ill-fated retreat from Kabul page 75 ( the loss of an entire Army of 4000 far better men and 12,000 camp followers is partly trembled a climactic factors per the several thousand died of coal ( the partly due to presentations by hostile tribesmen. In both cases their demise resulted from the monumental people does an indecision of the commander-in-chief, General Elphinstone.

The third in most cost the type of manpower wastage is that resulting from the deliver policy of attrition adopted by commanders who regard as Soldiers is wholly expendable; journals for whom the conservation and human life rank lower in importance to Darius other criteria which were covering their actions. A good early example does, is to be found in Napoleon campaigns, as suggested by his remark: " a man such as I am is not much concern over the lives of one million man ". The million or so no one Somme, and

154

Were done in a Passchendale were victims of the same attitude of mine.

This former mobile but by no means exhaustive list of human Cassidy suggested over the years a handful of senior military commanders have become careless"-- to save least -- with the fighting forces with which they were entrusted. Upon closer analysis, however it seems that their failure to fulfill the primary function of the commander, the culprits fallen to two categories. Firstar of those like Alvin Stone, Ragland, buller and personable: mild, courteous and peaceful man who, though no doubt carry deeply about the fearful losses which their Army sufferers, seen quite incapable of any other rating situation.

Thus Elphinstone could have occupied the Fortress about largest are. He could have allowed his troops to prevent frostbite by wearing makeshift goodies. He could have started the retreat earlier and completed it more quickly. Likewise Ragland could've exerted pressure on the government of the day to supply the crying needs of his troops. He could have taken direct action to procure firewood for the thousands who were dying of exposure. He couldn't galvanize to staff and some sort of remedial activity. He did not in these things, preferring to withdraw into the relative comfort of his farmhouse headquarters. Personal could've instituted defenses for jaw for an island of Singapore. He could've prepared adequate air raid defenses in shelters for the citizens of Singapore. He chose not to.

Buller, perhaps the most interesting case of all, could stabilize by a more generous deployment of his forces. So deeply did you feel for the suffering is mended carry the principal economy forces such legitimate curse ludicrous extent that thousands died for want to help from the tens of thousands Slightly standing by.

While the incompetence of these menacing spring from a crippling passivity and lack of what General Gordon Bennett has called progressive spirit world, they stood in sharp contrast to those of a second group would be setting Stan was overwhelming ambition coupled with the terrifying insensitivity to the suffering of others. These, men like a, Townshend, Walpole, Nixon, and jaw for it, seemed delegate to one goal dedicated to one goal -- self-advancement. Main, devious, steaming and dishonest, they were certainly not in active in the courses they pursued, nor of course were they necessarily without military towns.

In all of this we are anticipating a theory a military competence rather different from that held by proponents of the so-called " bloody to "

155

Theory. Perhaps we are being too complicated -- perhaps intellectually Defense deficit could explain the doubt? Let us then, before considering the other factors contributing to military competence, first examined is older and more favored hypothesis.

156

Chapter 14

The intellectual ability of senior military commanders

"I feel a fundamental crippling and curiousness about our officers. Too much body and too little head."

-- T.E. Lawrence

"Most British defeats have been caused by stupidity".

-- Karen Lee Barnett, The Desert Generals

What grounds are there, then, for the most popular explanation the military incompetence -- stupidity?

There is a suggestion that the Armed Forces did not attract the best brains. A recent column serving United States but the status of Army officers below that of protesters, positions, clergymen in school teachers. As Moorestown which remarks: " the liberal ideology... Bolted since war is essentially distracted, the best minds are attracted to more positive in numbers. Called Juan according to Field Marshal Montgomery this is been true for some time. Writing of 1787, he noted that the Army was the normal career of the less bright younger sons."to the end of 1907 he wrote: oh... In those days the Army did not attract the best brains in the country. Will

The gander is supposed to low quality of Officer cadets entered into services. According to Janowitz,: " the impression exist among educators the intellectual level of those entering the military profession via the service academies reflected the adequate effective and adequate minimum standards rather than any excessive concentration of students at the upper an of the intelligence continuing home three

The same writer knows dead in Britain 60% of all entrants

157

To a military Academy are greatly before arrival is liked to make the below average officer. You grant

In training for generalship, it seems intellectual ability has not always count for very much. Even hate, will be educated Soldier, became commander-in-chief of the British Army in the first world war despite a poor academic record. This dour lowly Scout Scott, described by Duff Cooper as the done to the family, but Lloyd George as " utterly stupid", and by bring on as Pete to block, had been very greatest difficulty in passing the Sandhurst enters exam, and only with the help of a clamor this knowledge of the academy's methods virtually guaranteed a straight through even the Dulles candidate per search Henry Wilson, who later became CID has had the distinction of failing three times in his attempts to enter the RM see. And

In well light might well be asked why they bothered with the selection procedure which purported to test for intellectual ability was in purpose could still easily be circumvented. Major General floor, according to Sir John Smith, one to a clamor who had learned by rote the answers to 12 likely questions. Since 50% of the predicted questions came up in the examination to alert managed to record Mark 497 out of 500 explanation mark for so unaccustomed were the RM see examiners to any sort of intellectual effort than 11 get memorize to set block on the Peninsula are war he was accused of cheating!

That intellectual performance counter for little when it came to subsequent promotion the Army might seem suggested by the scholastic progress appeal Marshall's Montgomery and Acoma, both of whom scraped into and passed out Sandhurst with low marks.

Commenting on these phenomena, Smith makes the point that"he says quite a lot of the stiffness of the standard Sandhurst Entergy can, and for the high standard of competition well to college, the both of these very capable officers should have passed both in and out of college with such comparatively modest placing. " not he may be right, though in the light of other evidence a more logical explanation would be that the academic requirements of the RM sea are not wholly relevant to those actually required for competent generalship. Certainly, a very performance and military schools is no guarantee of subsequent ability pill it. General Coley, whose succession of the each culminated in 1881 in his own demise at much of the hill, and extinction of passing out of staff cause of the highest marks on record. You relevant so

158

Early scholarship to subsequent generalship also find support in Napoleon in Wellington both of whom itchy very low grade school sex. A more recent times the very early academic brilliance of the to General Percival evidently impaled him little as Singapore

However, will military history is replete with examples have wanted the job stupidity, there are grounds for believing SS explanations merely reflect a preference for simple theories of what are really very complex phenomena. If the complex phenomena is unpleasant and the simple explanation abusive, then so much the better.

You taking here is it those intellectual shortcomings which appear to underlying military incompetence they have nothing whatsoever to do with intelligence, but usually result from the effect upon native ability of two aged and related traditions. The first of these originally founded in fact, is it fighting depends more upon muscle than brain, the second it a show of education is not only bad form but likely to be a positively in capacity. The problems of these traditions was mentioned by HM, some commissioners her Majesty's commissioners interrupt or upon the military bundling in the South African war. Though today take a pessimistic view of the educational standard and intellectual ability of officers from the Post Jr. to the most senior chemical council noted to their dismay that will keenness is out of fashion and not the correct form probe. Seven

One is only to read subsequent descriptions of military Naval training establishments proposition to realize that their words seem to fallen on deaf ears. In such places as size, muscle and probably said games still constituted the main criteria by which a man was judged. When writing of personalities who passed to Sandhurst, Peter Smith, PC, dwells cheaply upon their physical attributes. He says afield Marshal Alexander the was a good long-distance runner; the cadet who won the sort of honor was a fine athlete and captain of the rotor team probe, an officer who was killed in 1915 will possessed a fine physique and was conspicuous in every sport he took up". Eight in light of these and similar comments the uninitiated might be forgiven for thinking that the main purpose of the Royal military college was a turnout athletes or male models Ottoman brains capable of mastering the intricacies of war.

For feeling there are some who have seen the threat to originality and intelligent thinking in this approach. As recently as 1955, at the sovereign spur rate, the Duke of Edinburgh tilted history to say:

159

"finally, as you grow older, you try not to be afraid of new ideas. New or original ideas can be as bad as well as good, the war as an intelligent man with an open mind can demolish a bad idea by reasoned argument, those who allow their brains atrophy resort to meaningless catch phrases, to derision and finally to anger in the face of anything new. " nine

Intellectual level of future military leaders is below the average for other comparable professions, it seems a subsequent training did little to redress the balance. There have been locations for believing in a conspiracy to keep that way. In 19 wanted the acres Douglas committee, inquiring into RMA affairs, advocated doing away entirely with civilian instructors and using only Army officers. Is inbreeding of the uneducated was, however, resisted by the later may seek committee, will, depressed by what they found, considered that:

1. The general education of cadet should be continued ( and impossible state of affairs of the instructors were themselves on educate (.

2. Few young officer showed any capacity for command.

3. there was too much drill, to acknowledge rigid discipline and too much cramming for marks.

4. The instructors were mediocre and selected for prowess games and smartest rather been further knowledge of the subject they had to teach or their qualifications as teachers.

Much the same picture has been painted brick Canyon, forerunner of the Royal Naval college at Dartmouth. Again, the emphasis was on blind obedience, sport in ceremonial, which can regard to intellectual pursuits and little pride in knowing one's job.

The Cantonese which produced a man whose incompetence has sometimes cost society gear cannot be entirely held the blame for the eat those and I is which they maintain. Equally culpable or those who incurred them. Even as recently as 1949, after a war which was nearly lost to the effect of the cerebral Millstone of archaic tradition, Admiral to fleet the Earl of core can or, having taken the salute of Dartmouth, urged the cadets to " absorb tradition" -- rather as one might a juror a suffer from rheumatoid rheumatism to absorb some ancient well tried limit. Even Army there is the account of how one famous general, after suspecting the Royal military Academy, confined himself to praising the drill rather entirely on the importance of knowing the job of modern Soldiering.

Perhaps the clearest indication of the intellectual abyss created

160

Officer Training comes from rule full comments by the men themselves. SGS Brand remarked of Dartmouth College: " unhappily, in spite of all the air average the * were not well educated in contrast to the public school get cadets whose outlook and knowledge were so much broader than my own., "s can in this context, Janowitz makes the point that only the most exceptional senior commanders can allow themselves to question your choice of the military career. This General Robert E. Lee admitted that " the greatest mistake of my life was taking a military education ", and General Stillwell said "it is common knowledge that Army ops or as a warning track mind, these personally interested in stirring up or so he can get promotion and be decorated and that he has an extraordinarily limited education with no appreciation of the finer things of life."¹¹

Even as recently as 1972 Sandhurst course for onto cadets was reduced from 2 years to 1, and inch which drew from Geoffrey sail, a former director studies at RMA, the comment: " the professionally trained officer corps cannon pretty juiced able to cope of all situations and understand aligned wherefore out his profession in 12 of 13 months is pretty fully is plainly ridiculous. It is to condemn the long-term officer was not a graduate to being semi educated, a worthy object of the BBC's characters."¹²

Whether or not intellectual shortcomings lie at the heart of much military incompetence, the facts remains the deliberate colt of anti-intellectual is a has characterized the armed services. Both were just relate, as we shall see, too much deeper reasons for military mishaps the near or ignorance or slowness of mine, the fact remains at its attacks have not been helpful. The generals and admirals between the wars denigrate progressive bankers and poor scorn on menu robots which challenged existing practices must surely have tended to stifle any exercise of the intellect by those who wanted to get on, and deterred the gifted from ever seeking a military career. As Robert McNamara once remarked " brains are like hearts, they go where they are appreciated."

Even as late as a second world war of the painful effects of anti-intellectual wasn't were taking a toll off much-needed brainpower. A classic examples that of Major General Dorrien-Smith. This outspoken but exceptionally gifted officer whose talents were appreciated

_____________________________________________________

* cadets entering direct from preparatory school.

161

( in use ( by such unequivocally great general says Walpole, often lack and O'Connor created such resentment of his intellectual abilities in the military establishment that when he was relieved of his post as deputy seeds the IDS Cairo after the first battle on our main his ball with final. While there was no recovery. All those in Army who bore him ill will, that never forgiven him his brilliance and on orthodoxy, sought to that... The Word quietly filtered through the military "establishment called the Dorrien-Smith was not to be given a chance to rebuild his career". ¹³

The status feature of NI intellectualism is it often reflects an actual suppression of intellectual activity rather than any lack of ability. This is suggested by the rapidity with which so many military men rushed into print as soon as they are retired. Evidently evidently there was something waiting to get out. Unfortunately as were the heart points out, a lifetime of having occurred the expression of original pot it accumulates so often in their being nothing left to express. Recent research on the relationship between mental activity and cerebral blood flow ¹⁴ at exploit to the old believed of the blame, when muscle atrophies from prolonged disuse. Perhaps this touches upon the real cost military incompetence -- age? Since traditionally promotion has demanded depended upon seniority, commanders, generals and appalled have tended to be old, and suspension, memory, intelligence and special census all deteriorate with age, and maybe bad generals are just old generals? Certainly can be said that age will intensify most effects of the mind, ¹⁵ and over the years equality of generals has seemed not unrelated to retiring age. And no point was as more and evidence tendering the Crimean war ( page 37 ( and then again in the 1930s. Another contribution to incompetence tied with age was the on healthful tendency to satcom forcibly retire or otherwise curtail the promotion of the Zhang officers to unwise the fail to conceal their lights beneath bushels of conformity.

Such was the case of Major General J. After it sea. Four. On December 13, 1933, four, when the most intellectually gifted men ever served in the British army, was placed in retired list. This waste of talent resulted from the British prejudice aroused by is fully borne out prophecies, and the fact that he dared criticize those left gifted than himself.

Now at the time for had a champion in the men relatively juvenile general I inside, who recorded regarded the retirement as a scandal and opined

162

The polar had the best brain Army. However, when however, I inside was the position to reinstate polar, immediately cried off, saying: 00, I couldn't do that -- it would upset to turn the promotion. " as little heart remark: " this was a sadly revealing example of how even the progress of the mind Soldier tended to be subservient to the laws of " W. Stern ". Internist Ironside should be added that 1939 he did try to means that for, but this time, just one year before the Army was nearly annihilate by the sort of Armed Forces which polar had been in advocating, the reinstatement was scotched by the war office.

Yet another way in which age determines incompetence is to the voluntary resignation of intelligent young officers. According to Janowitz, our recent study the US Army Lt. Suggested the Prater once resigned as soon as they have completed their obligation or is, while those less well-equipped remain. This natural selection would military begins finding the brighter people in the upper echelons of the military establishment.

The notwithstanding these considerations, age is far from being a complete explanation the military incompetence, whether been plenty of cable old generals and some remarkably inapt one's young ones. As factsed as noted: cop will generals of 80, generals who are sick of body and even them in mind, have one important victories. " moreover, but very complex nature of military incompetence defies any explanation as simple as that of civility. Indeed, there are grounds for guarding the age factor is a symptom rather than a cost. The those look at another aspect and what appears to be intellectual incompetence the urge to pontificate.

The relation between the roles of ignorance and modification in military incompetence is not entirely simple. Personally, in accordance with the principle that nature of or is a backing, ignorance tends to evoke pontificate shouldn't in those waste concealment acknowledged, or for whom ignorance of backs means that they feel free to express strong wheel believes of a contrary nature. For harmless enough examples of the first of these two classes of modification there is anecdote of the start of cocky debt due, when asked why I was 22/7, was told by his mentor: " is not for us to question the wisdom of the Admiralty. "

Simon Reagan is given an amusing and using illustration of the second-class

163

of modification. " I have never forgotten the trouble I got into for contradicting a general who announced sodomy had rotten rotted the Roman Empire; the fact does officers clearly knew scarcely knew a word of Latin and by his own confession and never read Allied of given was held to be irrelevant." ¹⁶

Rather more serious are those modifications which in to make nasty tax go away a magical process of emitting loud noises in the opposite direction. Here are some utterances of this kind.

Field Marshal Montgomery-Massenburg, she for the Imperial General staff 1926 to 1933: " there are certain critics in the press to say we should organize the Army again for a war in your. Character God is not likely to be used for big war in Europe for many years to come.

Sir Ronald Charles, Master General of organs: while there is no likelihood of war in our lifetime. " this was said at the time of Hitler's a session to power. In, also before last war, search you and owls, director of military training: " the Japanese are no danger to us and sheer for our friendship."

In column were the accuracy of communication be a matter of life or death, the predisposition to become pontificate is a dangerous liability. Partially such a predisposition disposition will be strongest and those like headmasters, judges, prison governors and senior military commanders in for too long have been a position to lord it over their fellowmen. Unfortunately such a predisposition will also be strongest in authoritarian organizations were the preservation of apparent on missions by those about may be deemed of more importance than the truth. * school maker Parker

In the important thing about pond bisque pontificate shin is that though an intellectual exercise its origins are emotional.

Closely allied to pontificate she and the less hazardous is cognitive cognitive dissonance. This uncontrolled mental uncomfortable mental state arises when a person possesses knowledge or believes which conflict with the decision is made. The following hypothetical situation should make a matter plane. A heavy smoker experience is dissonance because the knowledge that he smokes is inconsistent with the knowledge of smoking causes cancer. Justifies it impossible to get up cigarettes, he tries to reduce dissonance ( i.e. tip the balance toward peace of mind proxies by concentrating

____________________________________________

* according to research by choppy, the fear of failure increases after middle-age ¹⁷

164

One justification super smoking and ignoring evidence for its risks. He may tell oneself to the revenue from tobacco helps the government ( i.e. he is therefore been patriotic (, it helps keep his weight down and it is a manly, sociable habit. The same time he may well refrain from reading the latest report on the relationship between smoking and lung cancer. Many other hand he cannot avoid being confronted by tiresome statistics, he may well strive to reduce dissonance battalion itself ( and others' ( the correlation between smoking and cancer could just as well be taken to sickness by the people were going to get cancer anyway tend to smoke in order to war off the disease.

Since first since it was first pronounced by testing juror in 1957, dissonance there has given rise to large number of incurable studies. The precise nature of the underlying psychological process is far from clear, there are certain conclusions which could have serious implications for military decision-making. Then he summarized by saying that: " once the decision is been made in the person is committed to a given course of action, the psychological situation changes decisively. There is less emphasis on objectivity and there's more personality and bias in the way in which the person views and evaluates the alternatives. ¹⁸

Another worse, decision-making may well be followed by a period of mental activity did to be described as at the very least somewhat one-sided. Since the extent of dissonance experience is a function of the importance of decision made, is likely to many military decisions eventually in fairly severe forms of mental disquiet. But military commander cannot afford to reduce dissonance when this involves closing is mine to or " reinterpreting " tolerable information. The dire consequences the might follow such an attempt were only two evident after the cabaret offensive and again during Townshend's advance on Crystal phone. In both instances to ostrich behavior senior officers cost the Army deer.

___________________________________________________

* the same may be said the ordinance counterattack in 1944 and a Montgomery starter, in light of subsequent intelligent words to think twice about his decision to capture the bridge it or not.

While the cost of dissonance resolution by some military man baby and orderly high, the probability of these cost occurring is also

________________________________________________

* it being in the first instance and Nixon in the second.

165

very high. There are three reasons. In the first place, military decisions are often Iraq erect a vocal but we're revocable. Secondly don't they involve large payouts -- no change in the outcome, including the reputation of the decision maker. Finally, those commanders weak egos, with over strong needs for approval and the most closed mines will be the very ones less able to tolerate the nagging doubts of cognitive dissonance. In other words it will be the least rational you'll be the most likely to reduce dissonance by ignoring on tolerable information. Research on individual differences in cognitive dissonance suggested its effects are likely to be strongest in those afflicted with chronic low self-esteem and general passivity. ¹⁹

More recent research in cognitive dissonance has emphasized another variation of some consequence for military behavior; the degree of justification for the initial decision. Experiments by some Bardo and others are shown that the less justify the decision, the greater will be the dissonance and therefore the more vigorous as resolution. No better example of word than that of Townshend's occupation of Kut. Since his advance of the Tigers was totally unjustified by facts of which he was fully aware, is dissonance, when disaster struck, mustard in extreme and, to a man of his egg each adjustable nature, demanding of instant resolution. So, he did in the face of much contrary evidence, he withdrew in the Kut. The wise impossible course of retreating to bows route would have been a greater admission of the lack of justification for his previous decision. The same token, once inside Kut nothing would by Jim, because the breakout, even to assist those would been sent to release and, where the emphasized his lack of justification for being there in the first place. In short, in inability to met one is been in the wrong with the greater the more wrong one has been, and the more wrong one has been more bizarre will be subsequent attempts to justify the unjustifiable.

We cannot see the relationship between pontificate she and cognitive dissonance. Pontificate she is one of the ways in which people try to resolve the dissonance. By loudly asserting what is consistent with some decision to have made and ignoring what is contrary they can reduced or dissonance. Clearly this particular confrontation of intellectual processes to prove very hazardous and military context.

But there is another aspect of decision-making no less hazardous -- it's " risking us. Recent research has shown that people vary in the degree to which they adjust the riskiness of their decisions to the realities of the

166

external situation. 20 individuals who become anxious under conditions of stress, or who are prone to be defensive and did not anything that threatens her self-esteem, tend to be padded judging whether the risks they take, whether cautioned a display, are justified by the possible outcomes the decision spirit per example., they might well adopt the same degree of cautioned whether placing small debt, adding married were starting a nuclear war. The sad irony about the state of affairs, for means those people or most sensitive to the successor starter of decision with the very ones to make the biggest mistakes. Conversely, a less anxious individuals lacked more rationally because they're able to devote greater attention to the realities with which they are confronted.

Obviously these findings have considerable alarming implications for the military scene. There is one psychologist is said: " under stress men are more likely to act irrationally, to strike out blindly, or even to reasons stupid immobility period, ²¹ others of remark: " the presence of relatively high levels of rationality and decision-making may characterize but a minority of men. Period. We are burdened by a nagging curiosity about how those persons controlling our destiny would distribute themselves within the personality groups outlined. ²² but why should anxious and defensive individuals. Vocal, those who have the most to lose, lacked more in irrationally than those less afflicted by neurosis? To reasons have been advance. Versus been well stated by Deutsche: " nervousness nests, the need to respond quickly because of fear but one will lose either the desire or ability to respond, in enhances the likelihood that response will be triggered off by insufficient stimuli, and thus makes for instability. Probe ²³

The second reason why a proportion of people will make your rational decisions whose richest riskiness is unrelated to reality is because, being Iraq they will strive to maintain image of themselves as either " Bolton daring " or as " careful and judicious decision makers ", indicators to sustain their particular conceit will take precedence over the need to behave realistically. Townshend's risky bid to capture Baghdad is consistent with this principle.

This chapter starter with the intention of examining the oldest area military confidence: the lead in net decisions cursor intellectual disabilities. The simplest form is there he is that some military commanders. The seas like some psychologist ( are just plain stupid and their faulty decision spring from low intelligence.

167

since decision-making is by definition, a cognitive process then obviously the oldest there he is in one cents a truism, but it by no means follows that the simple hypothesis of low intelligence fits the bill. On the contrary, by looking further and to major decision processes we are compelled to entertain another rather possible different possibility: namely, the deep air intellectual failings of some military commanders are do not the lack of intelligence but to their feelings. Cognitive dissonance, publication, denial, risk-taking and anti-intellectual-ism are all, in reality, more concerned with motion been with intelligence. The susceptibility to cognitive dissonance, the tendency to pontificate in the ability inability to adjust the riskiness of decisions to the real situation our product of Cessna Ron disabilities as extreme anxiety under stress, low self-esteem, nervousness is, the need for approval and general defensiveness. Nice, it seems, over and above his level of intelligence, or the factors which interfere with what a man decides to do a given situation.

168

Chapter 15

Military organizations

"Everything is very simple and more, but the simplest thing is very difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who is not seen more very well

-- C. Von Clausewitz, On War

Military organizations make for military incompetence into a stash directly, the forcing their members to act in a fashion that is not always conducive to military success, and indirectly, by attracting, selecting and promoting a minority of people with particular defects of intellect and personality.

The root cause of all this is that since men are not by nature all that well-equipped for aggression on the grand scale, they have had to develop a complex of rules, conventions and ways of thinking which, in the course of time, I'll supply into outmoded tradition, there is ritual, inappropriate Don Knott and then been up some military organizations, irrelevant vote bull should ". We're talking out what militarism will, a subculture which, in Lind, may well hamper rather than facilitate warring behavior. Three factors contribute to its growth. The first is that the origins of fighting are instinctive -- so-called intros species aggression. The second is that fighting was originally more a trial is straight then of wits. And the third that is something which, in its original form, many lower species can do rather better than we can. Let's consider these points and a little more detail.

Probably speaking, human activities may be regarded as falling into want or the other of two main groups: those which are directly in schedule and those which are not. Into the first, which involves what have been succinctly described as the " three at its " -- beating, fighting and

169

"reproduction and, -- all such robust press times as spewed dualism, professional plie, prostitution and Soldiering. Into the second group fall all those other locations which, though sometimes subservient the basic drives, do not have is there any product the original conciliatory response.

Besides his most important difference, been scheduled locations have three other characteristics which differentiate them from those in the second category. They may involve unlearn patterns of behavior, are motivated by crude powerful emotions -- fear, loss, rage -- and are designed to to culminate in the unlearn response a distinctly physical kind.

Now attempts to professionalize instincts may be comparatively easy, as in the case of by eating a prostitution, one fraught with difficulty, as in the case of fighting. Prostitution is easy because the transformation of an unlearn drive into moneymaking career is moreover matter of realizing a potential them seriously modifying nature. As ¹⁰ Lind Young's interviewees remark:, I'd been working in a factory five years before I realized I was sitting on a fortune all-time." one thenceforth been trot entrepreneurial woman of easy virtue as really to apply some sad, too clever things were for mascara, and the rest follows. Over the years the profession, like the art love, has changed little. But for professional Soldier, progress has hardly been so smooth, partly because, unlike prostitution, the conciliatory response is changed. The original purpose of intraspecies aggression is not destruction but distribution. In lower forms obliged instinct of aggression is controlled by language of signs and countersigned, so that everyone remains spread out with a minimum of bloodshed. Moreover, those animals best equipped to each other any injury are also those with the most effective controls against so doing. A dog tackles and up to encroach upon her rivals territory may become involved in a noisy scalpel but has only to drop his tail, rollover and urinate to terminate the attack upon his person, the most he loses his face, ( and water (. But for human such natural state court's ( besides being embarrassing ( have proved rather less effective.*in the first place, being on diverse, they have not involve such foolproof aggression inhibitors as have the corn or spirited in the second place, they have made up for their lack of natural weapons by acquiring some four

________________________________________________________________

*the could be argued it in humans in voluntary urination input by fear cease to be effective as a gesture of appeasement with the invention of trousers!

170

More deadly artificial ones. These have extended the killing distance far beyond the point at which any inborn signaling system could be expected to work ( natural signs of appeasement depend upon proximity (, and have reduced to vanishing point the match was the instigators of aggression. Is much more difficult to feel spontaneous spontaneously hostile towards an enemy you cannot see.

Yet other difficulties have been posed by the sheer size of human warring groups. With the transition from small parties of hostile tribesman to large mercenary armies can problems of motivation and control. Just a history of warfare is largely doubt of the many, who, to poverty or the press gang, were forced to take up arms for cause which few could even comprehend, the evoking and direction of aggression called for special measures. These included devices to ensure group cohesion, to incite hostility, to enforce obedience and to suppress mutiny. They also included means whereby the intentions of leaders could be translated into a concerted action by followers. In short, it called for two other components militarism -- firstly, a system of awards and punishment, of rank, metals, battle emblems in prize money, of confidential reports, courts Marshal and the lash; and secondly, a system of orders and over learned drills whereby complex patterns of behavior could be set in motion by the Preakness of instructions.

The no less important for a very a military incompetence is the means whereby militarism is administered and its continuity insured. This is the problem of " who bosses who " in the military hierarchy, and sorts of criteria which determine a person's position in the pecking order.

Originally, since combat was largely a matter brute force, we must suppose that the strongest gain to the top. In fighting, as in prostitution, vital statistics Cate gained the day -- a sort of natural selection according to criteria that were east Edgley physical. But of course the time the growing number of personnel involved, and improvements in technique, records and revision of earlier criteria. A distinction between became necessary between organizers and organize, between the brains and Braun. To this and civil government might have been expected to construct armies in which such dichotomies obtained. One might expected that officers would've been chosen for their brains, and the hierarchy of command based upon Merit and professional expertise. In Britain, civil government did nothing of the

171

kind. The very good reasons military power was vested in those who, became well satisfied with the position in some society, would do their best to maintain the status quo -- in short, the rich and the highly born. But the methods of purchasing nomination, the control of the Army was given over to men who, with nothing the gain from revolution, to remain the loyal, apolitical supporters of the existing régime. Professional ability, energy in dedication to the job accounted for little. If you are rich and well-connected you were eight; if you were not, you are not. This state affairs came to full fruition in the Victorian Army it was still in evidence at the outbreak of the first world war. It did little for military competence, but was eminently successful in other ways. Two countries can boast of such an absence of military chooses Britain.

However, a following the disaster contents of the primary war, there occurred a gradual change in the makeup of the British officer corps. The abolition of the purchase system and the growth of public schools produced a decline in the numbers are rich aristocrats seeking commissions, and arise in the numbers of officers drawn from the Brewers want to see very moreover, stand as a competence were improved by selection based upon examination. But while these reforms undoubtedly raised the quality expertise of those occupying tire positions in the military hierarchy, they did no violence to the old policy of confining military power to those without political aspiration, nor did they do much to change the class consciousness which is characterized not only to British Army since the time of Cromwell, but also be armed services of France and Germany.

The essential nature of militarism should not be clear. We see it as an ever-increasing Web rules, restrictions and constraints, presided over by an elite, one of his motives with the preserve the status quo. We see it, in the case of the older European bomb powers, as it natural product of a fundamentally jealous, class conscious hierarchy than just out to an basic conservatism insured at the present must always bear the hallmark of the past. And we see as a remarkably similar in many respects to get even those other prototypical Victorian upperclass family group, were absolute obedience and submission to authority are traded for security independence.

Obviously, there is much here to make for incompetence in warfare. But this incompetence is augmented by another factor, mainly the

172

Characteristics of some of those attracted to the military. Let us examine this hypothesis.

The modern standards, and it from the outside, the nature of militarism may not seem very attractive, including as a dozen number of attributes which are positively repellent to those who value personal freedom, egalitarianism and creative as opposed to distract bands. This distaste is common to both CP Snow sculptures. It is as strongly voiced in Einstein's comment --"this subject brings me to that violinist offspring of the herd mind -- the odious militia. The man who enjoys marching in line and file to the strains of music falls below my contempt; he received his great brain by mistake -- the spinal cord would have been amply sufficient " to -- as it is in factories, -- " unmanned wont degree you removed from ABC with brain's sufficient to direct his powers of mischief and endurance may make distinguish Soldier. --

Why then do people join the army, and are there some characteristics of the military which are positively magnetic attraction for those who subsequent performance may be deemed incompetent?

Any answer to the first question would involve reasons would include reasons which range from mobility from the need for selfless devotion to duty and patriotic costs to desire for upward social mobility. It would include the need for an exciting and very career interspersed with plenty of leisure given over to gentlemanly pursuits, a penchant for violence and a propensity to follow and father's footsteps. * they would also concluded distaste for other professions of comparable social status

The second question is rather more difficult to answer but one might say that since at a deeper level of analysis militarism constitute constitutes a number of defenses against certain anxieties, people who share the same anxieties and have a predisposition toward similar sorts of defense will be drawn towards membership of the military, rather as an alcoholic might be drawn to join our Alcoholics Anonymous. In other words, an individual with particular problems on psychological kind they be expected to gravity gravitate towards a group which he recognizes not only as containing fellow sufferers, but also as having developed effective ways of dealing with the special needs of its members buried the therapeutic gain from such behavior during the second world war has been noted by Robert Holt. He wrote:

___________________________________________________

* according to see be hotly, the single biggest occupational group from which Officer cadets, is the military profession.

173

It was a common clinical observation during the lower but military service was an unusually good environment for men who lacked inner controls... The combination of absolute security, a strong institutional parents substitute on whom one could lean unobtrusively, and socially approved outlets for aggression provided a form of social control that allowed impulse is to be expressed in acceptable ways. ³

In following this line of thought, we start with the apparent paradox that whereas the military way is concerned with defense against the external enemy, a large part militarism concerns defenses against the inside each aggressive impulses of its member subscribers. Much that we have discussed under the heading of militarism can be legitimately viewed as devices so as to control aggression that is projected only upon legitimate targets while keeping the other outlets blocked. In this respect are as close parallel between aspects of militarism and the group behavior of some subhuman species. Even a troop of the blues contrived the rigid dominance -- your hierarchy wherein each male noses place. S. K. Our. L. A halt remarks of these animals: " controlled aggression is a valuable survival -- characteristic in that is yours protection of the group and group cohesion. " ⁴

In a human level calming, our major symbol be authoritarian family grew buried justice eat those upper-class Victorian family totally forbade any show of aggression by the child towards its parents, but encouraged organized aggression towards contemporaries in such school pursuits is boxing incident shall a sanctioned bullying, so in the Army the slightest hit up in subordination ( i.e., aggression to war directed toward the superior ( is severely punish, while aggression towards the enemy is encouraged in rewarded. Opposite each such redirection of aggression is entirely consistent with the purpose of military organizations. The same token, a tight rein on aggression is mandatory in a profession whose stock in trade in solution to most problems is physical violence. The meal I massacre is similar atrocities show only to clearly how quickly things can get out of hand. As I. L. Janus has remarked: " the military group provides powerful incentives for releasing forbidden impulses, in addition to Soldier to try out formerly inhibited asked which he rate rate originally regarded as morally repugnant. " five from psychological point you, therefore, militarism strives to maintain paradoxical state of affairs were feeling angry may well be totally split off from

174

aggression, wanting which are Soldiers required to suppress his aggression towards his superiors will mean a low, while taking it upon a hypothetical enemy towards will be may well in entertainment loss to Felix.

Its situation from the possibility of breakdown. On the one and there is the anecdotal evidence is Soldiers who, in the heat of battle, should their own NCO was an officers in the back, or what barring standards on arrange turnaround asked the question without remembering the eastern finger on the trigger. Such mishaps suggested even the strongest defenses against tablet aggression they fracture under pressure. * when the other hand, there are those embarrassing locations, such as occurred during the American Civil War, when Soldiers sold for forget themselves as to become friendly with the enemy. The classic example of this unorthodox behavior occurred on Christmas Day, 1914, when British and German troops join together for can be the allergies in no man's land. Needless to stay, these group reprehensible flickering scud humanity were quickly stamped out by the generals on both sides. Fortunately ( for the General's ( no lasting harm was done, but the episode did not like the necessity for those aspects of militarism which insurers that aggression does not wilt true want to hate.

It is just because the business of the Soldiers destruction and violence that the need to take General precautions against disorder become so pressing. In this respect aspects of militarism are analogous to those precautions against heat, vibration or matter in the wrong place which might be taken by any imaginative explosives expert. The aspects aggression may be substituted under the general, it faintly impolite, heading of "Bullshit". So important is his couriers cannot carry his phenomena that he deserves a sanctioned to itself.

________________________________________________

* In the first six months of 1970 want more than 100 American officers were flagged by their man. According to one authority, but word for acting derives from the ordinary fragmentation grenade which troops used to booby trapped -- and maimed or killed -- officers in noncom's poor to keen to engage in combat ". ⁶

175

Chapter 16

Bullshit

"I have been in the Army for nearly five years and I cannot see how polishing brass, floors, and anything else the NCO thinks off, makes a man you, you're jumping to attention all the time, and marching around like a load of chorus girls and asking permission to go the toilet. The truth is that when you join the Army give up your freedom, both physical and mental, you are just to obey orders."

-- a regular Soldier

Why you the more striking features a militarism should be associated with both line each treat on remains a matter for debate. Certainly according to principal of disowning certain to sort of behavior by associating them with some other species or nationality. In this respect to "bull" shares the fate of "Dutch" Couric, "French leave" and "Swedish massage".

Them whom according to Eric Partridge, the word was coined by Australian Soldiers in 1916. Coming from a country whose Armed Forces have always been relatively free from this element a militarism, they were evidently so struck by the excessive spit and polish of the British Army the detailed move to give it a label. Going further back, it is possible that the expression has its origin in" the bull will, the false hairpiece warned by women between 1690 and 1770. This would be consistent with the fact that modern dictionary to find " bull " as a " ludicrous she asked, a self contradicted Tory statement, to Chi, empty talk, absurd fussiness overdress". Whatever its do not get into to men knowledgeable significance, such definitions certainly captured the nature of military " bull " -- one of the most astonishing, apparently irrational and yet significant aspects of militarism, one which can noted attitude of mine, a pattern of behavior and in product.

176

As implied by the old jingle,

If it moves, salute.

If it doesn't move, picket out.

If you can picket out, paint it!

To some amount involved ritualistic observance of the dominance -- submission the relationships of the military hierarchy, extreme orderly this and preoccupation with outward appearances. In this latter respect it is the extension of commonplace tendency in most human societies -- that taking outward show as the criteria according to which most judgments are made. This reliance on externals and constant urge to " keep up appearances " may well have its origin in three features of early very curly childhood. The first is the perceptual ancestry processes matures shorter than those underlying the capacity to think. The second used that early unlearn responses, so-called instinct show patterns of behavior, are set in motion persist at Pacific features on the sensory impression to do not require anything in the nature of an intervening thought. And authorities the children adopted values and attitudes of their parents, the themselves set great store by appearances. Many people in issue their mates because of what they happen to look like. Huge industries are geared to the sustaining of this particular source of possible deception, which results may which may well and in the very antithesis of Tonya you'll bless.

In the military, manifestations of " bull range from such minor apparent uncertainties as the policy of the backs of Badges, through the blame tolling of trays for a forthcoming to General's inspection, to such grandiose schemes as the decor of spears right cancer right to cancel. For less pleasant manifestations there are those drills and uniforms which have played the life of Soldiers and, from time to time, inflicted rather more suffering upon them than the enemy. Classic examples are the stock, I latter caller which held the head like a vice, and the court to chip away, a stiff pigtail for which the scalp had to be dragged back so far as to prevent a man from closing as I use.

Beside its emphasis on appearances and skin straining aspect, " bull " also involved a compulsive concern of cleanliness. In this respect alone it may achieve impressive levels of irrationality. To make it light, webbing equipment may be boiled almost to destruction, while the blankets the Soldier sleeps in stay unwashed for weeks.

177

There are, of course, good arguments for "bull": getting insurers a level of orderly this, cleanliness, disciplined, personal pride, obedience and morale which, so it seemed, could not be reached by any other means, i.e., by recent as opposed to compulsive behavior. The same token in achieve a level uniform even makes for sought of solidarity and group cohesiveness.

However, the case against it is also strong. It's time-consuming time wasting, excruciatingly boring for all those with more than the most meteor for intelligent Intel intellect., and a poor substitute for thought. Since it teams to govern behavior by set of rules and defines a rigid program for different locations, it cannot meet the unanticipated event. This may have fatal consequences, such as the possibility of admirals standing stiffly to attention, and that the salute, while the battleship sink slowly under them. But for " bull " they might have done something rather more in useful in their last remaining moments of Boise.

Like any compulsive cyst symptom, "bullshit" as close customs, ritual, dogma and superstition, at the themselves so far beyond recent thought the day create resistance to change in the acceptance of new ideas. Pick military drill. This starts is a skill adapted to reality situation. It develops and to rigid pattern of behavior which, by becoming iMac, takes the load off memory. Once learned, it is directed by processes of which we are scarcely conscious, and which Steve the Limited channel capacity of conscious experience mercifully free to deal with father and more pressing events. It is drill, in such ascent, which insure that most motorist left let off the hand brake before engaging the clutch, and that most speakers constructor sentences according to the rules of language.

Military drills started in this way. There were devices which could eventually well together a heterogeneous miscellany of uneducated peasants into a single corporate homogeneous machine they did as it was told.

This is all to the good but for one thing -- ritualization, implying to tendency to transform means intends. Just about drill one area becomes the ceremonial drill of another. We started as a functional useful maneuver becomes a highly stereotyped pattern of movements on the Barracks Square. In itself this may be no bad thing. Ceremonial can be pleasing dpi, and and all dying for taxpayers and even, on occasions, a device for raising charitable funds. But unfortunately ceremonial drill, like other forms of "bull", is addictive

178

When and, by being so, you service the time and energy which should be devoted to other more adapted pastimes. It didn't becomes a substitute for doing something else, as when the conservative element in the Brigade of guards resisted the adopting of the new battle drill because it would interfere with their existing ceremonial procedures. What it is considered that it was the same new drill which is being studied by the journey German General staff and the Russian high command in preparation for last four, one can appreciate the price that may be paid land, to use military expression, "bullshit baffles brains!"

As a factor in fighting efficiency, "bull" has also been on helpful in the Navy. If we assume that what the main purposes of the Navy is to defeat the enemy, and that this, in the past anyway, was achieved by shell fire, it might be supposed that much time would have been spent on practicing gunnery. But in the British Navy in the years before the first world war, should commanders were actively discourage from gunnery practice because the smoke might marked up eight work in soil the gleaming backs. The price for this was paid at Jet land. Want

In (, it is no accident that " bull called Issel will closely linked to conservatism, for its very nature is to prevent change, to impose a pattern upon material and upon behavior, and to preserve the status quo weather is that of shiny brass or social structure or it is no accident that " bull called in civilian life, that of the boiler act, rolled umbrella and strike traffic, or that of the garden party, should splurge in those sections a society renowned to conservatism. P*

Natalie touched upon some of the more obvious manifestations of the phenomena, let us examine its deeper causes, and relevance to the central thesis of this book

First, it seems to be a natural product of authoritarianism, IRQ organizations. Secondly, the witch that were invisible signs are manifold, then every common denominators. The first is constraint; the second, deception; in the third, substitution for thought. It stands each follows from the or others others. Essentially it is essentially by constraint that " bull " seems to combat disorderliness, whether this be of appearance, conduct or thought, but in so doing it necessarily concealed what is merely the case. It is worth noting that this aspect of behavior marks

____________________________________________________

* conservatism with a small "c" is not confined to the political right; "bull" is just as evident in some communist armies as it is in those of the West.

179

yet another point similarity between the oldest profession, militarism and the second oldest, prostitution.

However, where there are similarities are also differences. Intrusion pulse air, like blank vote and Busby's, are both concerned with outward show, the reasons for the deception are obviously very different. Whereas those aides to beauty affected by a woman of easy virtue aim to attract custom and stimulate desire, those of the Soldier reflect a more complex set of motives.

Main as pointed out earlier ( paid 170 (, in writing, like sexual behavior, is interstitial activity, and as such prone to control by what evil latte biologist called stimuli -- particular shades colors are patterns of response which are to specific to all members spread disease of water both sexes practice east of any given species than the us all Robinson have read brass, and all hearing goals have read spots upon their beaks. Such distinctive labels third a simple communications function, it is much as their presented by another member of the same species automatically releases in spiritual behavior appropriate to the sacks of the precipitate and the situation in which finds itself. For example, the read brass to the robin elicits aggressive behavior and another mail, but sexual response an female. For animals and small brains, and little capacity for learning or judgment, the possession of the simple labels is obviously of immense value. They are fast, certain, automatic in a function, and require no past experience of the situation in which they operate. To the disadvantages of in spiritual behavior are been is inflexible, in discerning and by no means foolproof. Even that will Faro of the village upon, the males statistical black, will attempt to mate with a block avoid having a per two persons on its lower side in preference to a pregnant female --however startling her pull per two did -- who is distended a exact ( the sign stimuli and ( happens to be concealed.

I'm in the before considering the likely relevance of these phenomena to " bull", there is one final point. It has been shown with lower species the supernormal, or larger-than-life, sign stimuli have a greater capacity for releasing the appropriate in spiritual behavior than have the normal, naturally occurring versions of the same stimuli.

Not lease indicating humans are not entirely immune to the effects of such sign stimuli -- as, say, paired tea which may release up your response, or the shape of a baby space which releases maternal behavior, where the contours of the female for which release sexual responses in the mail -- then it is reasonable to regard certain forms of

180

"bull" as a deliberate setting up of the supernormal sign stimuli.. The prostitute the pads out her bosom, were applies to rouge to her cheeks, has brass something in common was Soldiers to don tall hats and scarlet jackets. In both cases the little accurate aims to listed desire responses ( lost in one case, fear any other ( of a greater greater magnitude then would have occurred without lease the prosthetic extensions.

Take the case of threatening postures. Like the answer bought aides, we threatened by rotating our arms in words and raising our shoulders. With AIDS this response has the effect of lifting the hair on their shoulders, thereby making animal up more than usually fearsome. Tonight Show eight of owning Jerry shoulders, modern man discovered "padding" and the let. But these " supernormal stimuli " are overdetermined. Not only did they intimidate, they also decorate in flatter. Not only do they threaten the enemy, they also boost ego of the where. As well is making them look top, they make them feel top; and not why do they subserve aggression, they also serves sexual needs. Nelson to meet dislike of two French naval captains whom he found wearing a lax bears witness to the sexual symbolism of those overdetermined ornaments. He wrote: " they were fined outlets to which I think them Cox columns. I shall not port their acquaintance." to his choice of words, coupled with his own predisposition towards making amorous conquests, suggested he at least all the outlets as a competitive sexual display.

A similar response to it over determined aggressive -- calm sexual display has been noted by the period as. Turner when writing of British officers in the Peninsula reward. While the regimental observation not lack subjects firstborn. They despise Spanish officers who made their horses plants and character all before the ladies." ³

And for more modern example there is the provocative arrangement of one long cylindrical parachute mind flanked by two red painted spherical C- which used to decorate the lawn outside the headquarters of a royal engineers bomb disposal unit during the last war.

Another overdetermined piece of "bull" is the military salute. According to want authority, the wording of this gesture was the simple act of lifting the visor once helmet, thereby putting oneself at the mercy of an opponent. As such it has much in common with those appeasement responses and lower species which involve presenting total parts of the anatomy to potential enemy. It would man,

181

This straightforward communication Grill into a highly overdetermined piece of ritual. Thus the military salute effectively combines the threat of the raised armed with the reassurance of the opening and in which no weapon could be concealed. A similar admixture of contrary motives occurs in the practice of present arms. The triggers towards turns trick the trigger is turned towards the enemy will enemy will there, but the gun remains firmly in the possession of the presenter.

Well in staple or instinct whole origins origins and overdetermined nature of these sorts of behavior undoubtedly contribute contribute towards her tenacity, there are other factors rather more important. These can be substituted under the general heading of anxiety reduction.

Perhaps the single most important feature of "bull" is his capacity to delay anxiety. There are two components to dysfunction, Lon couches and rational and the other unconscious and proposal. Both operate to reduced to sorts of anxiety, the first social and the second instinct told.

Since, at a construction is rational level, orderliness, cleanliness, punctuality in discipline clearly make for efficiency, the knowledge that one belongs to an organization which puts a premium on these laudable traits, the ones rifle fire editors exceed for the bully be tin, obviously makes for confidence. At conscious rational level, therefore, even those aspects of " bull " which reflected gross exaggeration of these traits must seem like steps in the right direction. This confidence may, of course be misplaced. The commander assist upon meticulous attention to detail, down the last shining button, is no guarantee that you strategic thinking is anything other than pure trial. Indeed, he would well be unwittingly substituting a lesser for more important area of generalship. Nevertheless, there are good grounds for believing did those situations in which "bull" flourishes are ones in which it reduces anxiety he goes orderliness is fairly vital to survival.

Again, the impose uniformity which is part parcel of "bull" obviously makes for group cohesiveness, and what and that " were all in together " feeling which combats fear. We must suppose, too, bed that heightened conformity which he imposes well, like other forms of perceived conformity, encourage people, through a diffusion of responsibility, to perform acts which they might otherwise avoid.

Yet another useful feature of "bull", so it's been said, is its role as a distractor in time killer. According to this theory, a mind preoccupied

182

With buttons and to as little room for gloomy forebodings. The point is well made by a period be. Campbell one writing a naval customs: " in... It is the guiding principle on cable service to do ships Company should be constantly employed, and this is the reason -- apart from the necessity for scrupulous cleanliness -- why there is so much scrubbing of Jackson polishing a brightwork. " the him ⁴

In the same context this writer compares naval and civilian routine. It is safe to say that in many short jobs would team destroys initiative -- this also applies to many factory workers, but it is not so in the Navy bracket where [ every teen job builds on the is [ a blue jackets black ] character. 5 himand asked to lie enable a civilian characters should acquire such diametrically differ get different treatments, Campbell refers to the moments of danger which, occurred for the former but not the latter. This of course begs several questions. It confuses lots of initiative and blind obedience with the building of character, and makes the unwarranted assumption that enable rating space greater danger than many civilians, including merchant seaman, staple jacks, racing motorist, known climbers, single Haiti.Smith, coal miners and matted doors, not one of whom has to fortify his character to my polishing brass or scrubbing wood.

To arrest picture or to say that since the to call as in all oh Holmes called upon troops service tradition initiative, it'll thereby increased a feeling of dependency which they have to work their superiors. This in turn will increase their obedience and loyalty.

Finally, at a conscious rational wobble there are aspects of quilt bull full which may well helped to combat social anxieties and military men. Gorgeous uniforms, martial music, branching horses, and even being saluted, are obvious ball to tender egos and, by promoting Soldierly pride, too much to offset the hostility and ridicule to which the military are from time to time subjected by those in other walks of life.

But there is another, less obvious reason for quilt bull ", neatly did it serves to reduce deeper seated feelings of anxiety which may well have their origins in advance, on the related to the here and now, of which the subject remains blissfully unaware. Their spots in this case has the body and immediacy which is clearly not the product of conscious to liberation. The most extreme examples of this phenomenon occur in obsessive-compulsive the Ross is the roses, a condition in which the patient feels compelled to follow a pattern of ritualistic cots attacks. The does often includes as bizarre symptoms as compulsive handwashing,

183

and preoccupation with timing and counting, recur it reunited premium remained near Munich room initiative ideas, stereotyped verbal arteries, and always standing with one's toes absolutely in-line, six has obvious significance for more military versions of the malaise. * one underlying feature of such symptoms is that they are repetitive, stereotyped and occur without seeing site into their origins. Another is a day center around cleanliness and orderliness. Finally, they are often defenses against the design 80 were suppressed anger. This is clear from the great distress which may be OK to buy their forcible prevention. The

such symptoms are not, of course confined to the chronic sick. Milder forms may well occur in the normal population during times of stress. The counting, but tapping and the melding of.mil or, like the compulsion to make these claims and tidy during periods of menstruation, well-known palliative's for distressed psyche. Seven

But why should compulsive ritual reduce anxiety, and what are these deeper anxieties?

Let's not been around the blush. At the risk offending those with delicate susceptibilities, or who themselves have problems in these areas, it must be said that they involved for matters of primary importance in every human life: Sex, elimination, leading in death.

Take Sex buried there seem to be too main worries here, that of not being what one wants to be, and that not being sure bet one is what one yes. As the first, a psychiatrist colleague once remarked: " all my patients have the same basic problem: the men all on the women, and the women want to be main. " it seems that being potentially her mapper.leave some people chronically dissatisfied with their particular position on the sexual continuum -- a sort of old grasses greener on the other side the defense " feeling.

For those who did not nurse and unconscious urge to be of the opposite Sex there is the other problem, equally worrisome, that of not being absolute started the day are what they think they are. As many men have serious doubts about their masculinity.

Of these " triumphs " of our culture and methods of child reading rearing our something to which we shall return in due course. Suffice it to say that they constitute just one of the major sources of anxiety which men carry to their graves. They may, moreover, constitute one of the factors which may motivate people towards perpetuating those

______________________________

*research as shown a correlation 000.8 between obsessed journal traits and symptoms in Iraq Soldiers.

184

the aspects of cool bull will they could help to still these nagging doubts buried such trappings of aggressive masculinity as a three-foot so lowered or pair of pearl-handled revolvers dangling from the region of the crotch can hardly help but be reassuring for sufferers of this adult. [2004 EDITOR: today its the drop-leg pistol holster] The fact that men with high levels of c*tion anxiety ( men whose early years were perhaps in live in from time to time by the maternal threat, well if you don't leave it alone, I'll chop it off, ( have been shown to entertain an exaggerated fear of death as point to this conclusion for that military scene. The

But clearly the unique features "bull" called reflect something more fundamental than defenses against mere sexual anxieties. The greatest anxieties concerned data and unconstrained disorder. Since the two are inextricably related, a defense against Juan is a defense against the other also. This is perhaps the crux of the origins of "bull".

Let's approach this from another standpoint. Whatever its particular form, "bull" will result in state of affairs which is supposed to what many people would you regard as a primary source of delight: the natural diversity of nature. Port such diversity is in placable hostile buried is no exaggeration to say this aspect militarism is dedicated to the ironing out of differences buried the efficiency with which it destroys variety and imposes in uniform and he is match only by its demand for conformity.

To many people such answer and oven and of ammo. Indeed, most civilized cultures butter premium upon their opposite spirit with an instant wants the pouring on the reprehensible, but actually a plot individual differences. Whether in people, animals are plans, the variety of nature is regarded as a spiritual bonus. The animate and artificial arson merely regarded. Enclosed, cars and houses, uniqueness as market value. Not for nothing does current advertising for the"best car in the world, will make only one specific line -- that no two goals voices are alike. As for sexism, only the most pure tactically denied that variety is the very essence of enjoyment.

But will pull well invert these values. It were ships home and Jenny and frowns upon deviants. Whether it is, but is or dressing by the left, hair link, to inspection or marching feet, the quick to quintessence of perfection resides in conformity to a regulation pattern. This conformity is the product of constraint. That's even conversation in officers mass was confined for many years to topics other than women, religion, politics, Sachs or talking shop, a state affair of affairs which once drew

185

from punch the acid comment `it would be very dirty indeed if officers whatever throwback upon their conversation!"

It seems that since old bull " is primarily concerned with substituting pattern for randomness, it evidently reduces anxiety by the reduction of uncertainty. But why should the removal of uncertainty and trivial matters assuage anxiety for more important issues?

How is it that uniformity contrast, cleaning rituals and predictability of exchanged compliments restore peace of mind in the enormous uncertainties of war? Why, in one of the most incompetently leased this world is ever known, what about to embark on a voyage to its ultimate destruction destruction in about all of pusher Shima, was at the case that " again and again we washed the gang ways with soap and water, we scrubbed bridges, touch of the paint, scoured the brass work. Issues instill colds were not forgotten... Cleanliness became a mania! Nine ( a sailor in the rush showed Japanese war of 1904 (?

Anyone who doubts the soothing effects of " poll " has only to consider two other situations of rightfully frightening uncertainty -- marriage and death. If you look plate even a minor role in these advanced would deny the emotional support that comes from the time-honored ritual of weddings and funerals.

By way of trying to explain these effects to, two overlapping theories can be invoked. The first is that of entropy reduction. This maintains that called Bull will exemplifies the general principle, tall organisms, that of combating randomness.

The argument is simple -- living organisms are complex patterns which persist for time within the essential disorder from which they cane and which they will vote, with equal certainty, returned. To the notion that count conception, life-and-death represent stages in the process in its ad one other, namely that living is the process whereby the pattern endeavors to maintain itself in been, is a turtle isn't that this implies equally at microcosmic and macro cosmic levels. Whether it is a single cell, the integrated systems of the total organism, what external social order, there exists regulators, controls and constraints the spontaneity is to preserve the pattern, to keep this from that, to maintain purity and separatist, this holds true for the biological processes as it does for the construction of an urban sewage system. By these lights, social and environmental stress, extremes of Peter Cole, viruses, drugs or direct physical injury may be regarded as a forces which, because they threatened organism with the disillusioned called its

186

Pattern, with mixing up of its constituent parts, call 41 or another of the cell preserving tendencies. Indeed, alike can be construed as a fight for orderliness in the course of which much behavior, both voluntary and involuntary, both external and internal, is directed towards this and. The law, and rules for hiking, pro the role prophylaxis, antibodies, ejection mechanisms, a tree limb secretion and new years resolutions are just some of the devices which been distended perpetual drift towards disorder.

It is, of course losing battle. As Oscar Wilde said, a: " good intentions are useless attempts to metal of the laws of nature."one of these " lost " is it ultimately the forces of disillusioned increase beyond the capabilities of adaptive mechanisms told them in check, because the very processes whereby order is maintained ( of which one is composed of Richard compulsive ritual ( may themselves as soon destructive proportions. The notion has great generality. Just one special case of this destructive outcome is embodied in styles concept of the general adaptation syndrome. Can this refers to the fact that such internal bodily responses to stress as raise blood pressure may, in the end, precipitate irreversible tissue damage and data.

According to into this theory of entropy reduction, global " represents an extreme manifestation of the general and necessary propensity on the part of living systems to reservist randomness. This would account for the fact that the Sartori aspects of the syndrome are concerned with removing dirt ( matter in the wrong place (, with maintaining separateness, with keeping green light keeping green green light light; while preserving the status quo -- keeping here sure, jet brass shiny and rifles clean; and with maintaining uniform meet by written orders, shattered commands and other behavioral constraints. But, like waking conscious this in contrast to the drain, abnormality in contrast to psychosis, will poll,"makes its effect by constraint upon the " creativity " alt.

Obviously, the constricting, information reducing aspects of cool bull will extend beyond individual and his immediate possessions to embrace the total social scene, thereby preserving the hierarchy of ranking status, separating kind from low, into a meeting what is, from what is not, appropriate behavior for every situation.

Just as the general adaptation syndrome is the body's response to the internal effects of stress, so cool bull " may be regarded as an organization response to the threat of its disintegration. In the military this thread as two sources: external enemy, and aggressive impulses

187

Even a little members. *in either case, the greater the threat, the greater the constraints.

Thus the aforementioned and quit of the officers mass, which can find conversation to the utmost trivia, had its origins in the wholly rational avoidance of all topics which, in a profession liable to aggressive outbursts on the flimsiest preconceived pretext, might result in much wastage of life to delete.

So much for general theory. We coming out to the second, more specific theory, which aims to explain individual differences in a propensity for " poll ", and the relationship between compulsive cleanliness and a particular sort of personality

_________________________________________________

*Joseph son has drawn attention to the fact of the is supposed hostility of an apparent submissive subordinate in authoritarian organization may result, perhaps without conscious intent in behavior is actually destructive the goals of the organization in question ¹¹

188

Chapter 17

Socialization and anal character

"... A form of adaptation is dust achieved by narrowing in distorting the environment until one's conduct appears adequate to it, rather than by altering wants conduct in enlarging one's knowledge to want to cope with the larger, real environment. "

-- Kate. J. W. Crate, The Nature of Explanation

Line shooting, deceiving the false appearances, covering up, compulsive cleaning another mindless rituals are to be found the world over, and have presumably been so since Adam donned the fee to leave and he gave a first light polish to the apple.

The people are not born that way. For several years they show a sincerity and impressive disregard for all forms of cleanliness. They do not know the meaning of disgust, and are unmoved by disorder. On the contrary, they do their very best exemplify the second loft among dynamics that will enter peak always increases. "

Evidently, then, adult behavior and its accompanying attitudes come to socialization. Let's look at this processing connection with the development of the so-called renal character.

The precise details of the process whereby babies -- disorderly, demanding, self-indulgent and in continent -- are turned in to clean, dry, socially responsible adults is still a matter for debate. According to psychoanalytic theory, between the ages of 15 years to fear of losing parental affection, together with the threat of other dire consequences, moves the child towards nun habits for some rather bleak new ones. The latter of like to standards of the society in which he has been born.

189

now those needs of the baby which result in sorts of behavior for which set socialization is required are in a fact, as Freud is pointed out, centered on three eroding as Jones zones of the human body; the lips and now, the genitals in the anus. In babies, as it adults, stimulation of these areas is evidently pleasurable. This relationship relationship between needed pleasure is hardly to be wondered at, inasmuch as it provides essential motivation for the three vital activities of eating, elimination and reproduction. Species which do not enjoy these things, by people with anorexia and are posted, would have a poor chance of survival. In its raw form, however, such enjoyment is hardly compatible with the those of adult society, which, in demanding some control of basic drives, it tends to curb their free expression. So begins a slow process of socialization in early childhood. It is a wearing down with the where it is a wearing time for one and all. Normally, however, and he gets apparently formidable odds, is hard-fought campaign draws to a satisfactory conclusion, with parent and child winning a harmonious victory over the dark forces of disorder.

I say "normally", for sometimes, so it's been suggested, there occurs a content teaching of factors which resulted lasting effects of great relevance to the subject matter of this chapter. They include an unduly strong attachment by the child to the pleasure it derives from its eroding as Jones, and unduly strong dictate distaste on the parent part for manifestations of the child underlying drives, and, as a consequence, the implementation implementing of an unduly strict training program. When these three factors or operate, the resulting situation, which approximates the Dad of an irresistible force pretty 'logic, probably reached his climax in. A pot ( or as, some prefer to call it " toilet"( training. The nature and now, this process may be summarized as follows: small child obtains considerable pleasure from its bow movement, but when this pleasure is tempered by anxiety as a result of a harsh training schedule, theater result in reaction formation... " in extreme cases he becomes personal and he is, stingy, meticulous, punctual, tie down with pretty self-restraint. Everything is free, uncontrolled, spontaneous is dangerous. " *

-- --

* according to clients excellent review of research in this area, two there is considerable support for this constellation of personality traits, and some for their origin in cable eroticism. But the docile gold methodological the logical difficulties have sold for precluded any clear picture of their personal precise relationship to toilet training. See also but lost three, and the beach. 4

190

in other words, the individual resolves conflict by developing character trait which are the exact opposite of those he has had to renounce.

Now does not need any bass tragedy imagination to see more than a passing similarity between the success of traits in the practice of " bull vote. Both the ritualistic, concert and cleanliness and ordinance, and designed all down, and then cover up, impulses of the torrid opposite time. It scarcely meet adding that the latter half the word "bullshit", takes on a new significance in light of this comparison. The closeness of the relationship between these events of early childhood and aspects of militarism, moreover, conveyed by two other considerations.

The first concert of the matter of aggression. Socialization necessarily involves frustration, and frustration is, as we know, one of the main is the instigators of aggression; were not, the species once again have a poor chance of survival. But the sort appearance or cause there are spreading to develop obsessive rituals against there are also likely to be does it cannot tolerate any show of aggression. So who's to has to be suppressed a rather a place by safer, symbolic, outlet. One such, in humans as in lower animals, is ritualistic behavior. Just as the males tickle back who encounters a threatening opponent on the borders of his " territory displaces his aggression into the ritualistic punching punching the holes in the bed of the stream, so some units, made anxious by their own aggressive impulses, finally been such ritualistic axis a drumming with the fingers, counting or putting things in order. Hence, so-called obsessive traits may be regarded as defense is not only against dirt, but also against aggression -- the aggression which originally rose to frustration of infantile designers. * but " poll " also has a two prong purpose: to combat dirt and to prevent a legitimate kinds outburst of aggression ( aggression, that is, thwart superiors -- the frustrating and potentially dangerous data " parent figures " (.

One last connection between " poll " and obsessive-compulsive symptoms is her tenacity and proliferation. Thus the individual whose compulsive handwashing increases from 10 to 50 times a day has something in common with the devote enough " poll " was light becomes increasingly occupied with unrealistic and an anachronistic

-- --

* further support for this contention comes from a finding by the people of high scores on a test also show high levels of political aggression.

191

London extensions of what are originally quite rational pieces of behavior.

At this stage in argument is necessary to issue a caution. We're not saying the military organizations are hotbeds of upset cirrhosis, nor the does given to " poll " are necessarily manifestation compulsive symptoms. On the contrary, all but we are tried to show is that in Sunbeam's IT reducing, aggression controlling into Nashua's nature of " poll " becomes a leased at least partly inexplicable in terms of two not mutually exclusive berries. As a secondary, content any of socialization is no more than a special, alert instance of the first, more general, principle that life depends upon the preservation of a minimal level orderliness. *

There are corollaries. Firstly, we would expect become plump and complement Terry relationship between perceived threat of destruction and the occurrence of competence and Terry devices to preserve or weakness. In this connection research has not only showed that psychological arousal is decreased by ritual. But also that, under threatening conditions, normal individuals behave like compulsive the rocks. Seven secondly, the competence and Tori devices are patterns of behavior might be expected to involve compulsive cleanliness in strict observance of a dominant submissive relationship because the threat of disorder which they are ( unconsciously ( designed to meet activates a much earlier threat of being overtaken by the forces of disorder in aggression, a threat which is overcome by cleanliness and obedience. Thirdly, since the original causes of these reactions to threat or lost to consciousness, the resulting behavior tends to resist rational modification. For, since military organizations represent, par at salons, house or and consequentially defenses against aggression in disorder, they will tend to attract people have some difficulty in reconciling these conflicting needs, people overvalue aggression, order and obedience. This conclusion is supported by the finding the patients suffering from upset shoulder roses show improvement during military service. ⁸

_________________________________________________

* the nature of these tendencies under potential usefulness can be illustrated in many ways buried the following instance exemplifies in extreme form of the sorts of behavior to which they might give rise.

It concerns the military commander whose marriage roll martial interests centered around the design in citing of the trains. This necessity, all body albeit tiny, segment of warfare absorbed his mind to the exclusion of all else. He lived, worked and slept the trains, and when a new what had been built, insisted on " Christian Inc., his brainchild under the steady gaze of his troops. Six

192

Figure 3. The role of "bull" in military incompetence.

Combat ( Day ( produce prodigious several sorts of anxiety ( be (. True disease anxiety spread disease and increase efficiency (, aspects of militarism ( see ( are developed. These reduced milk primarily anxiety ( about " -- " -- Arrow (. The defenses against primary anxiety ( see ( necessarily make the rigidity of thinking, etc. ( be (. They also tend to attract individuals with personnel personal anxieties about dirt and aggression.

Both aspects of tea may be expected to have two adverse effects. Firstly, they will direct the reduced military competence ( be (, thereby increasing primary anxiety in the combat situation. Secondly, the evoke a number of secondary ( social ( anxiety spread disease (. Both these effects will tend to increase D., thereby constituting a vicious cycle circle of cause and effect.

193

The way in which the psychological processes could result in behavior that might lead to military incompetence has been well stated by Charles Rycroft. Our drink and the position that out the tree possible responses to threat -- flight, submission or attack -- is the last which most closely corresponds to human obsessional defenses, he makes the point that

There is however a form of attack or mastery which must certainly be counted neurotic. This is the compulsion to control everyone and everything which is characteristic of those who are liable to develop obsessional to roses... In this way they hoped to avoid anxiety by eliminating the unpredictable element in human relationships. If taking attain self-control to the extent of never becoming beached being overcome by unexpected emotion and can control others said they can cease to be free agents capable of spontaneous and therefore unexpected actions, then, according to the logic of the obsessional defense, the unexpected will never happen in the unknown will never be encountered -- and anxiety will never arise. Nine

In other words, those very characteristics which are demanded by war -- the ability to tolerate uncertainty, spontaneity of thought and action, having a might open to the receipt of novel, and perhaps threatening, information -- are the antithesis of those possessed by people attracted to the controls, and orderliness, of militarism.

Here is the germ of terrible paradox. Those very people who, because they have adopted attack rather been submission or flight as their preferred psychological defense against threat, are in. The best suited to warring behavior, may be the very ones least well-equipped for other components of successful fighting.

Considered in this light industry unremarkable testimony to biological inefficiency is so many military leaders have performed so well.

There is another and related manner to which we must turn our attention -- the decks that question to military honor. As a device for maintaining orderliness, courtly anxiety and directing aggression into appropriate channels, honor is to officers what bullshit is too noncommissioned ranks. Or as a whole "bull" comprises an array of relatively mindless ax, honor is more concerned with a system of ideas, a code of thought instead of inhibitions. As can be seen from figure three, both for apparently inescapable products of large-scale

194

Organized aggression. However, to appreciate the role that " character " and one of its options, military codes of honor, have played insert sorts of military incompetence we must first examine their more general psychological significance.

Note on Chapter 17

The author is only too well aware of the two suggested the General's personality may ( like anyone else's ( bear the hallmark obvious " potty training " reduces some people too nervous giggles. This being so, it may be helpful to consider the following propositions:

1. A person's psychological makeup is the resultant of only two factors -- his genetic inheritance and his life experiences.

2. Life experiences are most influential doing. The greatest elasticity in development, i.e., before the age of five.

3. Those experiences which are likely to have the greatest lasting effect we those which make the biggest impact of the time of their occurrence.

4. Before the age of five the most important of these are concerned with socialization.

5. A large part of socialization during this time is concerned with poorly trained. *

To the author, the logic of the simple propositions seems unassailable!

_________________________________________________

* act notwithstanding, or Lansky has produced some cogent arguments to develop the development of the excess of personality depends less upon the visit to just what training than upon a wide variety of cultural situations. Likewise, vowels cites evidence for the view that aggressive behavior is reactive rather been activity.

195

Chapter 18

Character and Honor

" why should unmanned in love with this batters, though goal"

-- Bacon, Essays: of death

"moderation in more easy this a lid in visit to baking facility"

-- McAuley

Whatever their profession, most people would subscribe quite happily to the notion that there are three components to the human psyche -- the instinct will, the intellectual and moral -- and that they developed in that were. Some physiologically minded psychologists put even go so far as to relate this tripartite organization to three general regions of the brain, with instinct being rooted in the activities of the old rank ( suitably cited in the so-called basal areas (, intellect a product of the cerebral cortex, and moral qualities depending upon a proper contribution from higher centers in the frontal for brain. This crude topography accords with the effect of the Jews in the various different regions ( e.g., damage to the frontal cortex predisposes towards a loss of moral about use rat disease and also with the facts of evolution. Thus, lower animals may be strong on aggression and sexually competent, but devoid of intellect and conscience, have lower brain areas much like cars but lacked the massive human for brain with its convoluted cortex.

For those who shrink from the idea but their strengths and weaknesses can be reduced to such an anatomical proportions a more acceptable description can be found in the concept concepts of psychoanalytic theory. According to this tripartite below you we start life with an EA -- importune it, rain the and aggressive; the choir and ego -- intelligent, perceptive and diplomatic; and then, if all goes well, become blast ( or saddle to ( with a superego -- the source of conscience and moral imperatives. Thou

196

Functional relationships between East three components suggest a view of man which, according to one description, seemed particularly appropriate in the context of this book. Old Man is basically a battlefield... A dark seller in which a well bred Spencer Lady Anna sex craze monkey are forever engaged in mortal combat, the struggle being furry by a rather nervous Bancorp. " ¹

These preliminaries are not irrelevant or purpose, for along with all the other psychological problems which beset does business is organized violence is that of deciding whether to plumb for intellect or character as the means whereby instinct is controlled and discipline maintained. Generally speaking, the older military organizations have opted for character in the younger ones for intellect.

In the context of militarism the forces of conscience and of character manifest themselves in various guises; in media load notions of chauffeur, in codes of honor, such as the duel, and in the believed officers must be necessity must of necessity be gentlemen. As crawled the matter as shown in his history of the German officer corps, these notions of honor and civic chivalry product out and were themselves reinforced by a care to select officer material from the wrist lockers he and rural land owners -- a state of affairs reflected in contrast of snobby stoppage kindness stoppage is this, exclusiveness, sense of honor and lack of intellectual ability which obtained between the officer corps, drawn from the aristocratic junk or families on the greatest dates of pressure, and those more bullish wall elements from the industrialized southwest of Germany.

A code of honor is a set of rules for behavior. The rules are observed because to break then provoked a distressing emotions of guilt or shame. Whereas guilt is a product of knowing that one has aggressive therefore might be found out, shame results from actually being found out -- in military store polls traditionally the greater crime!

Is usually assumed that military codes of honor served to reduce their. This may well be so. Their primary object however, is to combat not so much fear as to the as the sort of behavior to which fear might otherwise give rise. In other words, they're designed to ensure that threatening situations are met by fight rather than flight. They do this by making the social consequences of light rather more unpleasant in the physical consequences of fight. Whereas the latter might lead to physical pain, mutilation and death, the former adventure waits with far greater certainty in personal guilt and public shame.

197

One Soldier in action ceases life in immediate danger... Even the bravest will be ceased by a moment of fear. Biologically speaking, here is the natural reflex cessation of the instinct of self-preservation which dwells and within every man, heroes included. If victories to be one, this elementary physical sensation must be somehow artificially suppressed -- over compensated by a contrary reflex of a psychic and moral kind, converted into action. The negative content of discount reflex is the feeling ashamed. O. F. ", it says, " if you don't stand fast now run away, the others will laugh at you and despise you "...

Is Soldier last bracket therefore bracket be provided -- unless nature has done the job already -- with a set of automatic inhibitions that will save him in the moment of danger... from a collapse of his own morale. Discipline, of course, can holding steady from without; but is what moral defense against internal weakness is the sense of honor. To arouse this sense in the ordinary Soldier, cultivate and a bull ball, inspire it by his own example is the officer's highest duty; and to fulfill their duty he must itself have a sense of honor but is well developed, active and finely tuned. ²

And to psychological standpoint these views are unexceptional, and moral point of view highly desirable; get the matter needs to be pursued further. To the extent the code of honor is reflexive, in the sense used by the matters so, so is inflexible, thereby leading on occasions to behavior is so irrational as the border on the insured. Just a surge in be seen from the needless waste of good officer material but occurred to the custom of dueling. So damaging was his practice in the German corps of officers to take 16 any state of Electra Frederick the second made dueling punishable by death.*in the British Army challenges to dueled were still being issued as late as 1880.

While dueling was responsible for limiting just those officers who sense of personal honor and physical occurs was of the highest order, other aspects of military honor could be just as irrational in the destruction of those who might will not be such a wholehearted parties to the code. The following example all the soul illustrates the juxtaposition of " bull " and " honor ". The year was 1755.

General Braddock it sat out with these two regiments -- the 44th and

___________________________________

* the first Prussian law against dueling was dated 1652.

198

fell 48 -- and 600 are regulars on a marsh to Fort to canvass. About 9 mi. from it he was ambushed by Indians led by French officers. The result was disastrous. The men in their scarlet uniforms and whites battered gaseous, marched in columns, was sort of target and ambush force dreams up. Helpless because they cannot see their enemies, some of the British troops broke for cover and fired from buying trees. This up all Braddock and his officers; they considered sculpting behind trees both undisciplined and unsoldierly buried solely to roll the Tommies back in the columns, where of course they were butchered... The whole episode was glad improved neither leaders nor the system under which they operated were worthy of the troops that used. Number three

But there are other more insidious dresses and strange to which honor can get arise. Since honor it may be both personal and collective, the to code may be in conflict. Thus the pagan origins of the medieval code ovary * it would since the attic of killing and battle above all else gave rise to collective honor in direct opposition to the personal trees based upon the teaching of Christ. In other words to knowledge that what is aggression, and therefore bound to the injunction " thou shall not kill ", and the knowledge that what is a member of a group that is even more forcibly down to the injunction " thou shalt kill " bar, disable lease, dissident cognitions, and therefore production productive of stress. For every conscientious objector the must be many whose participation in lethal activities cannot be quite so ordered as someone wish. Another difficulty with behavior directed solely by a sense of honor is that, if its incentive is no more been on mortal and avoidance ashamed, the resultant behavior may be irrational, and a very strictness of the code have quite unforeseen consequences for the military way. So unthinkable was at the Japanese Soldiers whatever surrender to the enemy that they were not instructed as to how they should come port themselves if they did. As a consequence Japanese POWs were a relatively fruitful source of information for allied interrogators. ⁴

A code of honor may be likened to an endlessly prolonged invitation right initiation right. So long as the individual excesses demand sees proving himself

_____________________________________________

* it could be argued did these features a medieval story described by cruising the, such as the concern to rescue virtues while they were still intact, where reactions against the violence and uncertainties of those days -- yet another example those responses to threaten disorder mentioned in Chapter 16

199

Mentally in brave, a rightful member of the leak. Moreover, the tougher the initiation, the greater will be his liking for the group, 5 and the more wilderness fears regarding personal adequacy, guerrilla the encourage be still. It is yet another aspect of militarism which will attract those who seek assurance on those counts.

Furthermore, since the code of honor has tended to be associated with wealth and position, the long into a group which sets great store by honor the first labels social superiority. Just how important this can be is attested by the vigor with which military casts have resisted entry by individual's from humble backgrounds. Indeed, from the sometimes erroneous believed to the capacity for honored characterizes gentlemen, is only too easy to draw the unjustified conclusion that anyone who is not a gentleman must lacked his capacity -- hence the view, noted earlier that honor is to commission ranks what pullshit and punishment are to the other ranks. In fact, there is a considerable overlap. Privates are not without honor, and Field marshals are no strangers to " bull will. Moreover since global " can be a concrete manifestation of honor so, so honor maybe get " bull will which, in turn, reinforces honor. Degree of this escalation is vanity. Thus in Victorian army was a point of honor for commanding officers to try and outdo each other, not only in the splendor of their own accoutrements, but also in those of their troops:

The 11th Hussars were superb. They were overalls practical trousers bracket of cherry color, jackets of oil blue and Gold, spurred palaces, short coach Bora escapes, glittering with Boolean Bray and gold lace, high perhaps adorned with brilliant plumes... This gorgeousness was largely achieved it lowered cardigans expands. Is estimate it estimated he spent 10,000 lbs. A year on the 11th out of his private income. 6

Lord Cardigans knows not unique in lavishing in any attention upon the appearance of his troops which, in a more enlightened age, might be reserved for the ladies of the Miss world competition. Nor was unique in being a senior Soldier who combined exquisite sense of honor with overpowering vanity, and the renowned for skills and dueling with an almost total lack of intellect.

Reference to cardigans naturally blames to mind another facet of some military organizations which is closely related to honor --

200

There are unrepentant snobbishness. According to the dictionary, a snob is a " a Bulger person who tapes to utility or truck polls to those of high-ranking position, or regards the claims of wealth and position within it exaggerated and contemptible respect. " very simply, a snob is one who is impressed by, and therefore tries to identify Web, those were higher up the social economic scale, while straining to disassociate himself with those lower down. By these lights, such everyday affections as name dropping in paying society magazines to publish photographs of oneself were once near his family are obvious examples of snobbishness this. This may be immediately it explicable however, is much apparently snobbishness behavior in military circles. Why, for example, should Lord Cardigan, who had no reason to be snobbish, behave in such a way? Though extremely rich, with blood sufficiently blue by any standards, is the Tory astounding of those cold socially inferior " Indian army officers who had the misfortune to be in his regiment betrayed a streak of snobbishness bordering on the Bulger. Here as a man, with neither of those inferiority's which are traditionally suppose to underlie this unpleasant trait, displaying a form of its as for it went as that of any jump the nouveau reach.

The first and most immediate reason for this kind of behavior would seem to be that some military organizations even to the present day actually cultivate the psychology of snobbishness missed as a substitute for merit. Higher ranks are cursed her guard lower ranks is socially inferior.

To have heard that such archaic phenomena as a social exclusiveness of particular regiments, and the tendency for even allies apply ranking Soldiers to fill on comparable if forced to share position with those whose husbands are blower full year of military standing, are the result of age and once useful practices partly explains their tenacity.*

One is only to imagine the chaos and society which would result if all the great organizations confuse merit with class, and tried to reinforce positions on the working hierarchy by a system of snobbery

______________________________________________

* in amusing example the relationship between anxiety and military status has been recounted by Knoll Barber. It seems a during the fall Singapore Rob Scott, a civilian member of the government work Council, took to attending council meetings in his local defense corps uniform. This, however, proved too much for the general, Admiral and air Marshal members of the council, who were so embarrassed at having to share a table with a cool corporal " the date got moved to issue a " in mild takeoff". ⁷

201

To realize that there must be something quite special about military milieu which actually encourages such ways of thinking. To find out what this something may be, let us go back to first principles.

As a general rule, snobbish behavior be token some underlying feeling of superiority. It is a common characteristic of the social climber, of the individual low self-esteem, of the person who feels threatened or persecuted because of some real or imagined inadequacy. That there is an underlying pathology to the condition seems fairly obvious for two reasons. Firstly, those were emotionally secure are rarely snobbish. Secondly, the behavior is itself irrational, can also been self-defeating. After all, even the most hardened snob must know that other people were adapted seeing through his affections. There is nothing, for example, quite so transparent as name dropping or displaying indications. He must know at some level that is behavior per dot provokes it best amusement, at worst ridicule, contempt or even dislike, but he is nonetheless powerless to curb his snobbish business. Something deprives them on.

But why should the military be snobbish?

There are several obvious reasons and some not so obvious. Firstly, because, traditionally, top levels of the military hierarchy were occupied by the rich and highly poor, the notions the social economic and military status became into the sole related. To social status determine military status, so, in time, military status became spuriously equated with social status. While this undoubtedly provided an structure for snobbish behavior, he does not, of course account for the underlying motivation. The latter we have to examine a second reason: the anomalous position which the military hold in society, the plain fact that they're both loved in Haiti, admired and despise. This ambivalence, which ranges from ought fascination to cold dislike and which, as Kipling points out, fluctuate wildly from peace to war, as both conscious and unconscious components. At a conscious level society admires bravery, and joint pomp, is grateful for protection and proud conquest, what the same time disliking the authoritarianism, potential threat in enormous cost military organizations. And unconscious level many people undoubtedly project onto military organizations their own internalize conflicts over aggression, Ford is that what's fascinating in a poor to see others indulging in ( and getting away with ( behavior Good within oneself. The popularity of books and films dealing with four and

202

Violinist ( traditionally evident after a prolonged period of peace (, like that for pornography following an aged sexual repression, it tested a pleasure provided by the carry a satisfaction of hitherto frustrated drives. The breaking of taboos is also a threat to those internalize the defenses against one's own instinct roll impulses -- -- it's the ambivalence.

To this one must address the civilian population space to price for their military organizations, they will quite naturally expect value for their money and be critical of incompetence. As General Gordon Bennett wrote: "civilian sprout provide the manpower for huge armies. There is provide sons to fight. They make sacrifices, enormous sacrifices for the cost. Why does lose their husbands, children lose their fathers, fathers lose their breadwinner's. Families lose their breadwinners. They go short food, clothing and the conference there used to Perry they paid a heavy taxes required to fan a finance our war effort... Practically its bracket when they know that serious mistakes have been made that wanted a lot. After all day pay the cost of these mistakes. " ⁸

Under the circumstances it would be very surprising if some awareness of these trends did not influence the military, leading and, the same lease, vaguely apprehensive at not downright defenses.

But there also stresses from within. To know that they have waited there lies to essentially destructive hands, the day shoulder great responsibilities, the day may be called upon to carry out tasked far beyond the capabilities, and the price of value is enormous, it's quite sufficient to initiate feelings of uneasiness. Even notions of retirement are fraught with stress. The knowledge that most ex officers have little value on the civilian labor market, that their lot is a total obscurity of genteel poverty, that the only the very best in very worst of fold journals and a bulb are likely to achieve immortality, and that none of them will ever again command the absolute obedience to which they have grown accustomed, can hardly be described as reassuring. *

To the factors underlying the South protective and compensating aspects of snobbishness must be added was perhaps the most important one of all: pre-existing doubts about the self. Since, as we noted earlier, there is much in militarism to attract those with doubts about their masculinity and intellectual capacity, it would not be

-- -- * according to keep. In. Carstairs, retired Army officers are among those professional groups of the highest rates of suicide. ⁹

203

 

surprising to find the number of main with problems over self-esteem will be discovered at all levels of the military hierarchy. Moreover, since, as we shall see, the desire to bolster sagging self-esteem is a great motivator, we might expect this percentage to work its way into the higher echelons.

One piece of corroborative evidence for these views comes from yet another characteristic many military organizations: their notorious sensitivity to criticism. A work, therefore, about this curious phenomenon.

In discussing origins of snobbishness is, the point was made it is usually the tokens some underlying sense of inferiority, that only the socially insecure need to be snobbish.

Applied to military, this may well seen difficult wallow. Snobbish they may be, but insecure -- never! This understandable skepticism, by those who perhaps mistakenly equate physical mite with promotional stamina, and the gorgeous exterior with spiritual point quality, does, however, ignore one stallion feature of military organizations: they're great sensitivity to criticism and the fact did this because each you precisely at those buried plan, following upon a major war, the popularity of their calling seems to be on the wane.

In Britain is sensitivity was activated by the blunders of the Crimean war, reemerge with the disasters of the Boer war, and reached a peak between the two world wars,. Not very surprisingly, it seemed related to the numbers killed in each proceeding conflict. Judging from the goodwill and get advice among the low regarding which the Army was held after more world's campaigns, you can't that pathetic feelings may well relate more to losses that incompetence, into the feeling that even for great commanders, victory at any cost is hardly admissible.

In that tremendous combat bracket not compact bracket near upon 250,000 men were engaged, more than 30,000 of him were slain or wounded right deceased the Allies lost twice as many men as they killed a French, whom they conquered (: and this dreadful slaughter very likely to place because a great general's credit was shaking at home, and he thought to restore it by a victory. If such promoters which induced to Duke of more Boro to venture that prodigious stay, and desperately sacrificed 30,000 brave lives, so that he might figure once more in the Gazette, and hold his place his intentions of little longer,

204

The events defeated the dreadful and selfish design, for the victory was purchased at cost which no nation, greedy of glory as it may be, would willingly pay for any triumph. ¹⁰

Whatever mall boroughs motives, it was during the period following these advanced officers were detected, depending on their age and seniority, as either quilt rate waging Lipper snappers will or will doubt he tyrants will, men who had been tuned to a military career you is usually as a result of being cocked in flight grant the late till we will want out of mothers chambermaids well. It was the same Tory pamphlets air, Ned Ward, who wrote that a captaincy in the guards to be entertained by " getting some bodily consolation to an ancient lady well. ¹¹ the Army has also stop erred in comparison with the Navy. As bond has written in Victorian times, will the Navy was the bulwark of the Constitution, and had need managed up seldom attracting public notice. By contrast, the Army flaunted its unwelcome presents everywhere..." ¹²

And recently another reason for sensitivity to criticism has come to the four, namely the fact that the tearing of arms become what Abrams calls equal receding profession world. He describes this recession to a steady loss of the professions monopoly of knowledge relevant to the service is supposed to provide. 13 this state of affairs is an aggravated by growing confusion as to which role, coupled with an increasing lack of consensus among its members as to what membership should entail.

All in all, the military is often had good reason to feel sensitive about its image. The fear of possible criticism has taken several forms -- the finding of scapegoats for military disasters, the whitewashing of senior commanders after military courts of inquiry, the watering down the bad news and official reports, unnecessary censorship, interference with the activities war correspondents, the refusal to promulgate the finding subcommittees interpret all coal of previous military enterprises, the curbing or come post or a retirement of officers who spoke out against effect of practices ( and brass even worse actually suggested some improvements (, and the refusal to appoint made the key positions when the same individuals had been favorably compared by outsiders to less competent officers. According to backs, even the editing of history is not unusual. While to meet the requirements of their contemporaries and a posterity is inhabited generals and their staffs not only to edit the reports of battles but also to word their

205

others in such an irregular fashion that victory, he becomes, can be traced to damn, well failure, the pitfalls, can beast used as a missed reading by those lowering command. " ¹⁴ and Francis Gross is advice to officers, published in 1762, included this precept: " when it anytime there is a wondering or confusion in the maneuver, right in amongst the Soldiers and lay about you from left to right. This will convince people that it was not your fault! ¹⁵

To these indications of sensitivity to real or implied criticism we must add another recent origin: the hostile post bags of those who had dared to record the less successful activities of senior commanders, often long since dead. One such was the urgent demand for a public apology which Russell Bratton received from a group of military gentlemen following publication of his book on the siege of caught up; another was obtained response up will the friends of French " to Smithers story of Smith Dorian's often grace period 16 it is not too difficult to see these hard feelings as evidence of the familiar identifications which obtained in military organizations, a sort of " don't be beastly about Father however much he is at fault ". The most striking examples of this response were in connection with general server Redvers Buller after his removal for incompetence during the boar war, and with Major General Gordon ban act panic, who wrecked his career by abandoning his troops after the fall of Singapore. Both blur and Gordon Bennett were defended by the protagonist long after their shortcomings had been widely proclaimed. In all these cases the lives and tabs of thousands of ordinary Soldiers were evidently considered less important than the reputations of their leaders. In talking of criticism it might seem that we were making a great deal of class about nothing. After all, nobody likes criticism, and as for complaints about military historians, it is only natural, in the laudable, to show loyalty to one's group. There are however, some special features of the phenomena in some military men which deserve attention. In the first place, their sensitivity seems out of all proportion to that of other public figures. In terms of fame or notoriety, well known general store admirals are on the level with film stars, politicians and even newsworthy academics; hence one would expect that they might come to accept the possibility of negative publicity as part of the game, a small price to pay for the " perks " which they otherwise enjoy. This they seem unable to do. In fact, there is a distinctly paranoid alum in the way some senior commanders have

206

reacted to even the main dish rather criticism; to the biggest and most tactful suspicion of a raised eyebrow or clear trial -- almost as if they were being held personally responsible for everything that might go wrong. At three

in this the second place, it just like a criticism has, on occasion, been so intense as to lead to behavior diametrically opposed to the well-being of the organization which they represent. The refusal by Montgomery massing bird to disseminate the findings of the car committee on the first world war, and the blighting of the careers of progressive Soldiers like Hobart color, fall into this category. In the third place, the response to criticism has, upon occasions, like the aftermath of the can break take offense, been so blatantly sell damaging as to fit label will Iraq" ( i.e., behavior which the individual cannot help even though he knows that it will be rebound upon itself (.

Dr. Cooper summed it all up when he described " the Soldiers at the top " as " shot off "" unlike other public men", but thirdly sensitive to criticism -- so thin-skinned. Instead of realizing the value of criticism and its publicity value to the Army it regarded any suggestion, a day had been some model, as a personal insult. 17

In touching upon the delicate matter we must not lose sight of its significance and relevance in the present context. Whatever else it may be, sensitivity to criticism is a measure of insecurity. It implies a leaky bill which, in turn, and by way of compensation, manifest itself in particularly particular character traits, one of which is snobbish business. Whether this bill this is due to some early shock the self-esteem, or feared the breakthrough of unacceptable urges impulses, or some combination of these two influences, the individual so afflicted developed certain defenses which helped minimize painful feelings. This fine support in yet another feature of military organizations -- their colt of antifeminist seat.

After a very important in exacerbating factor has been the regulations for bidding serving officers to write to the press to defend themselves against unfair and often in ill-informed criticism. In this writer's opinion, not being allowed to answerback prevents written us of those unpleasant feelings which criticism evokes.

207

Chapter 19

Anti-enfemininancy

"Well let war ceased altogether and the nation will become economic"

-- General Chaffee

When discussing the various anxieties which militarism serves to reduce, brief mention was made of the years with which some may entertain about their masculinity. Thus it was pointing out privacy see page 185 ( back, though primarily concert of combating the thread the dread of disorder and dissolution, certain star Tori aspects of whole poll " might also help to reassure opposing problems in this area.

In putting together the jig salt military incompetence, therefore, we can now take a one-piece which clearly has great relevance to this topic call call: the striking antipathy toward a feminist see which characterizes some military organizations, in this despite the fact that the female is usually regarded as " more deadly than the male "! Evidence of this antipathy is unnecessary excess of the circumstantial. It embraces such phenomena as:

1. The importance attached to such outward signs of sexual identification as hair length. Since the assistance on " short back and sides"seems correlated with those periods in history when sexual difference a patient was linked to hair length, we can dismiss excuses of neatness in 19 as rationalization. Field Marshal Board Wellesley State the true case when he said " it is very difficult to make an Englishman anytime look like a Soldier. He is fond of longer share... Here is the glory of a woman but the shame of a man. " one

2. Traditional taboos on certain topics and pastimes. Thus we find a Captain Foley, or are. In period, commander of retaining a naval training establishment for Officer cadets at Dartmouth, forbidding piano playing because he considered it defend it. Two and 1973 in car described the comparable incident in connection with a fellow officer Gerald Lang.

208

In Northern Ireland-year-old had returned to one of his Early allows, which was painting, and the journey he began taking lessons. As this passion crew, the Army's disapproval hardened until there seem to be a continual as ideological battle going on... For the assistant accident, a blind youth with a rich roast knows, the word, of the word vote artist " was synonymous with " homosexual ", and he quartered me one-day ( I was considered to be the evil influence on Gerald ( and said desperately: " now look here... I that nothing against our " but couriers are bad... I need it!... Disgusting! ³

In 80 years previously, we're and eight. Age. Markham, whose fatal obedience and lack of initiative, when confronted with the " in possible order will buy his autocratic superior, vice admiral dry and, resulted in a collision between battleships, seems to have been afflicted with a similar prejudice. " cigarettes ", he was told his officers, " are only four in feminine weak links. " ⁴

3. A deeply rooted prejudice towards women who try to adopt traditionally male roles. An early examples a hostility Inc. hour by Florence Nightingale enter after today's manpower wastage from disease and doctrine nutrition during the criterion war. A recent examples a lack of Corporation experienced by Mrs. M. Pratt Joyner attempt at chain information for her book on Victoria crosses. * of this she said, " may bracket regimental associations bracket considered that woman was not a proper person to write such a book. Regiment after regiment I found to disappoint you. " 6

After all of these prejudices it can be argued that the real threat of women who do manage jobs is the income minimizing the role they, by association, emasculated those who normally fulfill. The differences in Outlook between those armies which issued training women for combat roles and those like " the Israeli Army " which do not add straight to this hypothesis, as does also the observation that one of the favorite insult rolled Officer cadets who make a poor showing Teresa Ramon real trail is that the look pregnant. One suspects that this form of abuse is, paradoxically, unknown in those armies where, because they contain women, there may for want to be some truth in the assertion!

Finally, an equation between defense of behavior in feminine seat --

-- -- *Mrs. Pratt died before being able to complete her book, Everest our Aristocracy of the brave. ⁵

209

the feelings that it is this she to where air protectors or build head covers rather see seat age 55 ( -- as undoubtedly cause much unnecessary destruction of the human body. Just male is in many respects last top, less able to let stand pain, more mortal, and, from a purely a now Tom Opel point you, more portable than the female, this equation, though understandable is sadly ironic. It is not unreasonable up on not a unreasonable hypothesis to suggest its most glaring and constant illustration incurred in connection with the issue convoys. In the first world work, hundreds of thousands of tons of merchant shipping were lost through the Navy's refusal to adopt convoy system when Lloyd George eventually forced convoys upon and unwilling at 90, losses fell significantly. The lesson was playing for all to see. But in the years between the war is the same irrational dislike of " mothering " of block of ships prevented the development of inefficient escort system. It was not until spring of 1941, after. Lattice losses, but recent triumph once again and the escorting emerging convoys was resorted to Indian in in anything approaching a wholehearted matter. The benefits were once again immediately apparent. But then America entered the war and, unbelievably, in the face of overwhelming evidence, insisted on trying to defeat you both without the use of convoys. Where are does and, America's great Fleet commander the first world war, not only forestall the air of their ways, but appeared to grasp the underlying motivation when he wrote call: " it therefore seems to go without question the joy course for us to pursue is to revert to the ancient practice of the convoy. This will only this will be purely on offense is back in offense of action because of we concentrate our shipping in the convoy and protect it will for naval forces we will thereby forced the enemy, in order to carry on his mission, to encounter naval forces. Seven ( the talus italics mine (

But despite the admirals gallant attempt to convince his kids minted the need not feel ashamed of the pending convoys, his words went unheeded. Between December 1941 and the following March American losses of merchant shipping grew to the staggering monthly total of 500,000 tn.. Eventually, the price of aggressive masculinity embodied in the so-called patrol and hunting operations on isolated warships proved too costly, and convoys were instituted between Houston and Halifacts. Losses on this route promptly dropped to zero. But Southold Boston ships still sailed independently until by June the number of ships on reach the all-time record of 700,000 tn. In a single mom! Transport convoys were rotten to the Caribbean without

210

One ship being lost. At last lesson had learned. But as McIntyre remarks, "at what cost ". *

2004 EDITOR: the anti-effeminancy continues today! Its not "macho" enough for infantry & armor units in Irag to escort and clear truck convoys supplying the the very things that keep them alive (fuel, food, water, amunition, mail etc.)---Army doctrine is that undertrained/underequipped Military Police (MPs) in flimsy HMMWV trucks are to secure main supply routes (MSRs) on today's lethal, non-linear battlefields; so while the egotistical "combat arms" narcissists with 9mm pistols strapped to their legs as a prop up for their small penis size/vulnerability knock down defenseless civilians in the middle of the night playing wannabe "Delta Force" (unit on top of macho pecking order of ego) the roads are not cleared of command detonated landmines and guerrillas with RPGs, AKMs and molotov cocktails. When the "underclass" truck drivers are killed the survivors grow up and realize dolce dolce decorum est is a fatal dead end, they stick up for themselves and demand armor protection and armament but they are told to drive to their deaths of face UCMJ court martial action! Yet another reason why we need an ADULT PROFESSIONAL military filled with strong adults who know who they are and don't have psychological chips on their shoulders..like the Israeli Defense Force (IDF)...

In touching on this topic, jet which makes the point that " the call to manliness and toughness associated with junior officers " in the American forces " bracket is often a reaction against profound feelings of weakness."it is hardly coincidental that the same writer endorses the view that " the most peaceful men are general ". 8

The argument is simply the proportion of those used to opt for career in the armed services do so I of underlying fear of being unmanly. Such individuals will be attracted to organizations would set upon than the seal of masculinity. But he admitted to assist our men bent upon the most primitive manifestations of maleness cash violence and aggression -- individual cheesy reassurance he requires. But to maintain this reassurance he will in turn have to contribute, by word and deed,to the elaborate defenses against the pendency of this adult as she has entered.

Proposal military incompetence this cool "Butch" element in the armed forces", whatever its origins, may well have two disastrous consequences. Firstly, we shall find positions of imports billed by some of them cold peaceful General's " of lunch at which rights, men who startled light, a compensation for feelings of in fury, tucked into the top but didn't serve them kill in the rule generalship. The classic examples that of Sir Redvers Buller, and it is outward trappings, such as his large size and powers deeds, proclaimed his "masculinity will, but who concealed beneath them a soft and passive personality.

That a second unfortunate consequence is a since military organizations constitute you're really proving grounds they give rise to those excesses of drunkenness and over sexuality which happen time to time seriously threatened fighting efficiency. According to John laughing, this outcome is particular to any Armed Forces of United States:

American fighting it wants sex for breakfast, lunch and dinner. When insects make up a large part of the thoughts and speech of any Army, but with the Americans they amount

________________________________________

* dislike of convoy escort duties is also been described to a preference among some naval officers for membership of a large battle flee. In the light of evidence to be considered presently this preference may well stemmed from the fact that ship commanders in the battle plate have in fact far less skilled for personal initiative that had escort commanders of merchant convoys. Knight

211

to an obsession. Opposites particularly have seemed more interested in women than in getting on with their workshop: private Soldiers of complaint this since the days of the Revolution... They bracket the Japanese bracket were soon convinced that only two things matter to American servicemen -- Sex and liquor. ¹⁰

The third and no less disastrous consequence is that by selecting and promoting on the basis of such "Butch" criteria as size, strength and physical Kurdish and promising games, the Armed Forces tend to ignore other attributes which really may be of greater importance to senior commander -- intelligence, I educational level, resistance to break down under stress and substantial reserves of moral purge.

There is of course account argument, namely the general should be wrote leaders, which would necessitate them have at least some of the aforementioned "Butch" traits. Sheer physical size, position of decorations for bravery and off-line rubber record would, according to this argument, confer invaluable leadership qualities upon top military commanders. Unhappily this very does not stand out. Firstly, the causal relationship between leadership and "Butch" traits is at best one-way. Natural leaders may well have made good captains of the buying XP, but being good rocker in no way insurers the best qualities military leadership. Secondly, while physical stature, and so on, are certainly advantage in this to a would-be leader, so-called masculinity attributes count for very little in comparison with personality and knowing one's job. Good leadership is synonymous with inspiring confidence in those who follow, and confidence is born of results. Thirdly, the most cursory glance at military history suggests that many of the really great military naval commanders -- the polling, Nelson, will, for instance were made a brainy character, not up huge bodies with dazzling records in the field to sport. In case these views would seem here at a cool let it be said that they record with those expressed by at least one military man of some repute. A generalship, Montgomery says: while the science and art of command... Bracket involves bracket in intimate knowledge of human nature... A commander must take two stages ahead. Old he speaks glowingly of the physically quilt frail " wool and Nelson, describing the latter has a quilt brilliant semen and most original, intelligent and courageous fighter, ". In that same many can be comments on the quilt flexibility"" brilliant intellect world of Napoleon. But nowhere does the field marshal dilate upon the advantages of mine physique, Harry

212

Masculinity, and a reputation for long-distance running, Polo or boxing. ¹¹

The fourth point is this: in days gone by, when physical straight count for more the battlefield and mental ability, to senior commanders could exercise their road powers by leading their troops into action, the physical aspects of their road leadership were no doubt important. But in modern war generals and admirals are rarely if ever seen by the vast majority of their men. Under such circumstances to road leadership Moscow for rather less than managerial and technical ability.

Since the foregoing section has clearly been treading on very sensitive ground, the history trace the argument to make sure but no unjustified injury has been done.

We are concerned to relate and explained to indisputable phenomena: so-called quilt peaceful generals called the wind times of stress revealed themselves as passive, depended in a decisive; and the antifeminist eat those it is all military organizations. That leads back to the following points were made:

1. Some men, for reasons rooted in the early family situation, have serious doubts about their sexual adequacy and/or physical straight in size.

2. such men may deal with their feelings of inferiority by adopting a competent Orient style of light in which the Stryker reassurance in some suitably symbolic role.

3. The prevailing eat those of many military organizations provides his reassurance.

4. Hence a percentage of men will seek assassins by the Armed Forces simply because such acceptance is to Warren T. of their masculinity.

5. Once in, they're continuing an underlying fear other than effective tendency rather see synonymous with adequacy in the minds of this particular group practice these predicted that well-known pattern of behavior which we have turned quilt Butch quilt.

6. But this competence at Torrey compensate story behavior is itself highly valued in the Armed Forces. Hence the individual not only profits by, but also contributes to, the antifeminist sea of his parent organization. It is India's interest to do so.

7. the significance of all this for military competence is that quilt "Butch" characteristics are not perhaps the most important criteria for top let level leadership. It is therefore examine this last point.

213

Chapter 20

Leaders of men

"Oh how credibility to lead depend on the ability to follow? You might as well saved the ability to float depends on the ability to sink. "

-- L. J. Peter and are. Whole, The Peter Principle

Whatever its other causes, military incompetence supplies of diary leadership. This is hardly surprising. The psychological problems which beset military officers Felix E. is severity those associated with leadership. In this respect they never Corps required to fulfill incompatible roles. They're expected to show initiative, yet remain in the and by regulations. They must be aggressive, yet never in subordinate. They must be a situation carry for their men, get maintain an enormous social distance. They must know everything about everything, it never appear intellectual. Finally, as we saw in the last chapter, they may well have been selected for attributes almost totally unrelated to the tasks they are expected to perform.

Discussion that leadership is so often overlooked with day but you don't be motive ideas than one is hard to what tool nailed the concert now. To cut through the monopoly of such cause a moral and unexceptional bull associations as cool patriotism, will play out the play the game ", the " never asking your men to do something you wouldn't do yourself " formula, will not getting in ( or out ", the " square job Frank I. steadfast gays"formula, ( as a lender look ( and the " get... You'll be a man"recipe, one comes to the simple truth that leadership is no morbid exercising such an influence upon others that they tend to act in concert towards achieving the goal was they might not have achieved so readily had he been lifted their own devices.

The gritty ingredients which bring about this agreeable state of affairs are many and varied. At the most superficial level they are believed to

214

Include such factors as voice, stature and appearance, and impression nominations, trustworthiness, sincerity and bravery. At a deeper and rather more important level, leadership depends upon a proper understanding in the needs and opinions of those one hopes to Lee, and a context in which leadership occurs. It also depends in good timing. Hitler, who is neither on the sheet, trustworthy nor sincere, whose stature was unremarkable and his appearance occurs on the repellent, understood these rules and exploited and the full advantage. The same may be said of many good comedians.

In short, there is nothing mysterious, romantic or necessarily laudable about leadership. Indeed, some of the most effective leaders have been those who, merely to having more than their fair share of cycle pathic traits, were able to release antisocial behavior in others. Their secret is that by setting an example they release a way of acting that is normally inhibited. This gives pleasure to their followers, thus reinforcing their leadership.

In military organizations leaders are usually of a rather different kind. For start, they are pointed rather been emergent. That is to say, the needs of the individual Soldier play almost no role in deciding sort of leaders that he gets. Secondly, the military leader possesses constitutional power all the magnitude which surpasses that of leaders in most other human groups. If he cannot pull his followers by force of character, he can at least pushed them by force of law.

The very unrelated feature of military leadership is that it is essentially outcry and operates in what modern theorists call a what we own" rather than an all quilt all channel communications net ". In other words, the flow of essential instant information is to and throw between the leader and his subordinates rather than between all members of the group. Not very surprisingly, but we'll net, though no doubt gratifying to autocratic leaders, produce more errors produces more errors, slower solutions to problems, and reduces gratification to the group than does the more democratic all channel net.

In the light of these considerations is proud strains at leadership in the British Armed Forces should have been as effective as it has. In dcom on the assumption to the primary function of officers is to get the best other men, the curious how can be brought by the gentlemanly managers of the Brook Dorian British officer corps, and even but is still relatively unprofessional officers of the first world war, deserves considerable respect. Since the Syrian feature of all the campaigns

215

So far considered has been remarkable absence of neatness tendencies and quite astonishing degree of tolerance, fortitude and bravery shown by the, Soldier, we have to ask: what is despite or because up their leaders? And the latter, how was it even the most in net and reactionary of them could still touched the hearts of the made a day would give themselves to the fight with a cheerful and destructive energy that could, on occasions, rise to whirlwind proportions.

Even midnight healthy stone, Townshend and Buller, about whose flagrant incompetence in a rule decision maker there can be no possible doubt, earned a loyalty and affection, I'll be far beyond their desserts, which maintain them around fighting spirit of their made almost to the end.

That way of trying to explain his curiosities let's consider a few more findings on the extensive research on leadership. The first point to note is the distinction that has been drawn between trolls of the leader: " task specialist called" social specialist ". As that specialists a leaders prime concern is Dickens achieve the groups a sensible goal; and the case of the military, defeating the enemy. For such a rule, being likable is a rather less important rate than that of being more active, more intelligent and better informed in his followers. In his capacity as " social specialist ", however, a leaders made function is to preserve good personal relations within the group, thereby still maintaining the row as to keep the group and been buried in the military deal used the function of a successful social specialist would prevent kidney and reduce such symptoms of low morale as absenteeism, desertion, sickness in crime. Not very surprisingly, the most important action date of such a leader is that he should be liked. If agency in task ability are of rather secondary important spirit was obvious that many leaders in the British Armed Forces have tended to be social rather been task specialist, we have to ask why do should be.

Is he should answer one part of his question. They were poor task specialist caught because borrowers is traditionally an amateur Army in which professional ability, at knowledge and military player have counted for little. The like good social specialist

2004 EDITOR: armies don't fight to stop the bullshit to keep them honest to reality and their profession

Again moderate researchers shown up was impossible answers. It has been shown that whereas low stress groups, operating in situations that are devoid of painful uncertainties, to best under democratic leadership, organizations like the military in times of war there are subject to stressing ambiguities actually prefer autocratic leadership.

216

In other words, the feelings of dependency induced by straps successfully neutralize the persons normal antipathy toward the outcry leader. Want while it may like Townshend would not be likely to survive a very long in a modern civilian firm, his autocratic mean was six lovingly excepted by men whose lives were hanging by a thread.

But even get, given the right circumstances and autocratic mean was in no part of being like, we still need some positive reasons for the extraordinary popularity of otherwise incompetent commanders. There are three such: " risking his ", " social economic status and the past indulgence of the individuals concerned. Other things being equal, a man who is prepared to take risks makes the more popular leader and want not still inclined. Two by taking a risking metaphorically, if not literally, stands on for the group and is perhaps, by so doing, shoulder irresponsibility for behavior in which the group needs, right deceased and wants pride deceased to indulge but for which, if left on their own, they would lack the necessary moral stamina.

2004 EDITOR: he's the first one to seen so everyone else can jump in and emulate

and the dictionary's pleasure in feeling of admiration which we derive from contemplating big gamblers in any walk of life are components of the psychological phenomena.

The less readily inexplicable favor doctor is that of social economic status. Three these are probably at least three components there are probably at least three components to the inflow is of wealth and position. Firstly there is the ", sometimes no doubt erroneous, believe that " he must be better deny" which gives rise to the " therefore I will follow him to the grade of necessary " feeling. Secondly the judicial good manners and self-confidence of the financially socially secure obviously makes World Cup more kindly inhumane paternalism towards the underdog.

The officers of the old school earned a love their made by behaving towards them as they might towards cherished pads was possible because the real and enormous social goals which the rank-and-file proceed between sell themselves and their rulers. The time-honored distaste which other ranks have felt for officers who rose from the ranks is all part of the same picture.

2004 EDITOR: narcissistic hero worship of selfish phonies who make no waves instead of embracing the competent mustangs who rose up through the ranks and reach career walls when their truth telling gets them in hot water with corrupt status quo

Finally, the fact their position was assured to their wealth meant a relative absence of those unpleasant straits was are associated with feelings of social inferiority.

Another obvious reason for the likable which eventually it's in good social leadership has been researched by Greer. For this worker showed the successful leadership tended to occur if followers had been told by the leader. This case to tractable nature of the group

217

Evidently reflects a wish to return pass papers. By these lines it is hardly surprising that even the most incompetent generals are often effective social leaders. No one took greater risk than Townshend, no one was more concerned to indulge his troops in Boulder, and fewer could outdo such notables as looking, party date and radically we came to a matter of displaying social economic status.

However, to someone who is not had the misfortune of serving under any of these officers in a scene scarcely credible that the riskiness of Townshend, the indulgence of Bull or and the socioeconomic status of the Crimean general's could have compensated for their other characteristics. How, for example, could troops overlook the palpable and city of Townshend and the total quilt on riskiness cloak and Larry incompetence of Butler, and how could they forgive the apparent negligence of Raglan? Currently straight related reasons. Firstly, in war, as in other situations of more threat, there is an inn there is an understandable urge to clutch at straws -- the good aspects of the leader seized upon, the less good keenly denied. We would guess that this anxiety reduction will, moreover, be particularly likely to occur in a situation without degrees of choice. The situation of Soldier, in an organization which allows up no escape, confronted by the threat of imminent destruction, is just one such. To put very simply, he makes the best of a bad job, and this includes wholeheartedly excepting leader even when the latter was not it is choosing.

"It is the nature of military organizations to recapitulate the cycle demand dynamics of an authoritarian family grew, one in which the pattern from mileus can do no wrong. Is not necessary to be an ardent believer and psychoanalytic very to realize that, in times of stress, there is a natural markings back to an earlier source of security.

But there is still want other reason for the extraordinary tolerance shown towards disastrous leaders, -- their " in visibility will. The reputations of many bad generals have survived simply because individuals concerned get out-of-the-way. Like God, they did not often reveal themselves. This analogy between believed in an earthly leader and belief in God may be carried further. Both are sometimes functions of experienced threat, and both may be enhanced by the surrounding industry. Whether they are in fact good or bad, "invisible " leaders like Ragland undoubtedly benefited from not being known and rarely seen by the rank-and-file.

The phenomena is best perhaps illustrated by that most controversial

218

All figures, Field Marshal Haig, of we it has been written: " to pricing down as a blundering, heartless incompetent in the prevailing fashion calls for considerable hearty hood on the part of the credit. One fact remains cannot be question: until the echo of the last shot had died away, no condemnation of Hay was ever voiced by the rank-and-file of the 2 million strong Army under his command. " five when it is considered that few of these 2 million ever saw their commander in chief that were confronted daily with the immediate, and fearful, consequences of his generalship, the parallel between blind acceptance of an clue invisible " military leader in the strengthening of religious convictions ( regarding heavenly competence print ( which follows monumental natural disasters can hardly fail to be drawn.

The ideal military leader is, of course, one who manages 22 combined excellence as a task specialist with an equal flair for the social or heroic aspects of leadership. Since the traits required for these two aspects of leadership a rather different, the so-called " great man " leaders have been comparatively rare. Six amongst the best examples were Wellington, Nelson, Lawrence, and in recent years, Field Marshal Slim. Such leaders managed to two combined extreme professionalism in realizing a military goals with a warm humanity would turn them the lasting affection and loyalty of their man. There have, of course, and other " great man " who, lacking the natural talents of the Nelson or slam for the role social specialist, have deliberately simulate simulated the necessary traits. The prime example does John or is Field Marshal Montgomery. By nature are rather cold, intra verdict and autocratic individual ( beside him seen by many of his officers (, he nevertheless had the good sense to apply a somewhat contrived bonhomie, Helfgott with packets as cigarettes and numerous Edges, which undoubtedly did much to ensure morale and group mindedness in the troops which he commanded. Too many people, whether they like them or not, it must seem totally incomprehensible that Montgomery should have been actually criticize for is quite deliberate showmanship, which probably did more for civilian and military morale than any I many other generals beginning warfare. Such shells and unwarranted sniping sing simplifies woman or basic causes and military incompetence, you need a fatal confusion between the practical and symbolic roles and military organizations which results in the sacrificing a military efficiency for the sake of " good form will.

The evident success of some British senior commanders in their role

219

As social leaders does not mean that military mishaps have never been due to shortcomings in this respect. Three situations in particular have provided skilled for military incompetence. The first changes upon the fact that though the leisure qualities required at one level of command may result in promotion, they are often not does relevant to a higher level of command. Just as a brilliant general, such as the Oscar audience Sir John Monash, Australian Sir John Monash may have been in different Brigadier, mediocre battalion commander and third-rate platoon commander, so, more seriously, there have been outstanding platoon & Co. commanders who, promoted on the basis of their performance at these levels, and adopt as in that is beloved channels. Such examples of the Peter principle, wherein people are raised to their own level of inefficiency, was never better illustrated than in the case of surrenders buller, who has been described as a " superb major, a mediocre Colonel and an abysmal general ". In this case, high-level military incompetence must be laid at the door object if you wrote leadership, for this was the quality which eventually put them where he could do the most damage to his own site.

The second situation in which the motivational as opposed to the intellectual aspects of leadership may lead to military disaster is where obedience, even vote by a hero worship, loans reason and moral sensibility to such an extent that the group may embark upon behavior which is little short of suicidal. The classic example is to be found in the psycho pathetic behavior of some German units toward Soviet citizens during the invasion of Russia. It is certain the does behavior helps seal the fate of Hitler's forces by turning potentially sympathetic Soviet peasants into bench. A tors. It is possible that the discrepancy between " military " behavior under Hitler's leadership and the older, Prussian coating show every produced a sagging morale and failure of Soldierly pride from which the Corps officers could never totally recover. There's nothing so eroding a morale as to dislike oneself.

Happily, heroic leadership in the British military has usually been confined to younger officers. Senior military commanders, by reason of their unsalable rank in sheltering staff, have often remain so isolated from the rank-and-file but their possession, or lack, if you wrote qualities has passed unnoticed.

There is, however, one further aspect of these more nebulous qualities of leadership which displayed in not in considerable part in story of military incompetence. It concerns the position which an individual occupies into related continuing is: those of boldness two

220

Caution, Inc. also this to indecision. Over the years military incompetence has resulted more from a dearth of boldness then from a lack of caution, and more from up all of indecision then from an excess of April 70. The patient Latin committee of General's Warren and Buller XP and cop, which we looked at in a previous chapter, is a good example of this failure of leadership. Another is that of the SoHo operation in the deliberately contained Camel, were " the greatest chance of the war was thrown away by the most object selection of General officers ever congregate in one spot will. ⁷

In more recent times, the Norway expedition of 1940 displayed not only short similar shortcomings in high-level heroic leisure, but also the Monte in frequent contrast between the verve and initiative of junior commanders and the caution cautious in decision of those at higher levels of control. Donald McIntyre, writing in these events, records:

The commander-in-chief, hopefully, after hesitate until nearly noon on nine April, detached his cruiser Squadron and destroyer to attack at Bergen, only to have his or an old by the Admiralty the feared the short offenses might by Dan have been taken over by the enemy... What a different approach had been that of war Burton Lee ( to destroyer to load to let leader who spirited destruction of German forces at Norfolk earned him a posthumous Victorian across bracket --" intendsattacking at Don! While his initiative and daring had turned are mixed into immortal trapped for nearly half the total German destroyers for strength. It even now the hardest which were burden these sewing at prepared was nearly lost to the British through indecision and hesitation. Not peaked

The saying lack of forceful and decisive leadership of the highest levels of command was also at me in the fall of Singapore right disease see page 139 (, when caution, precipitated partly by the theater of injuring subduing around, resulted in two little been done too late to avert the worst disasters second world war.

One obvious explanation for the Ferrier of the motivational aspects of leisure, and all these instances, is the relatively advanced age of the individuals concerned. Old men are more cautious than young men, and less able to make quick decisions in those whose arteries have not begun the heart and. The refusal by the elderly general per ward to exploit Wellington's crushing defeat of June not at the marrow in 1808 is a classic example of the sort of failure in leadership.

221

Doesn't allow Boris voice clearly honorable to his staff Wellesley exclaimed: " Sir Harry, now leisure time to advance. The enemy are completely beaten, we shall be in Lisbon in three days. " Sir Harry hesitated and Wellesley Preston McGann, adding that date of Sir Harry himself taking part in the victor's campaign... The French had in fact flight eastward, leading Torres address and the road to Lisbon open. The Sir Harry had said no wants and he said it began. Another was enough. He'd been created a baronet for doing nothing much at Copenhagen in 1807. Before June not attack he had said no to Wellesley, " wait for more. --, quotation mark he repeated. It was not upon the Apache Woody. Wellesley turned away into scouts, the market to his officers they might as well go issued Redlake Partridge is. Nine

Another possible factor is in many of these instances involved combined operations. Even bull or had a detachment and Naval artillery which, with Ankara bull corridor bull and fatal opposite his seat, he forbade to use against the enemy positions was being top. Arteries perhaps cases where it or service jealousy, like sibling rivalry, effectively deflate in used up the motivational energies of both arrivals Western mark this was certainly true of the Singapore disaster, both in the chiefs of staff corals of 1925 in an lack of effective lies on between Army, Navy and Air Force commanders during the Japanese invasion of Malay in 1941 in 1942.

The door other more fundamental and pervasive reasons for these failures in leadership was to be ascribed to the general psychopathology of military organizations. The common denominator is anxiety. Is a feature upon services at the penalty for air is very much more substantial than the reward for success. Whereas the naval officer who, through an air of judgment on the part of his subordinates, but to ship ground will almost certainly be court martial and stands fair chance of being heavily punished, the reward for taking a bold action which pays off may be no more than a mention in dispatches were some decoration with little no effect upon promotional prose prospects. The net result of this bias towards negative reinforcement will be that fear of failure rather than hopeless success tends to be the dominant motive force in decision-making, and the higher the ranks stronger this motive because there is farther to fall. There are of course other reasons for supported supposing that the anxiety

222

Which tends to curb bold initiative will be stronger in the higher levels of command than lower down the hierarchy. The one thing, responsibility is greater and, for another, perhaps the first time, there is no one hot pulp higher up to whom the senior commander can appeal.

Finally, mention must be made of the pieces before by Simon rated which made the oatmeal for the future. It concerns the role false promises in the training of officers, false promises that have their origin is simple and obvious fact: thin expectation of superiority in a leader by those who are led will increase the tendency to follow him. If, on a prior or write grounds, you believe is somewhat is better educated and knows Morgan you do, then you will be more prepared to follow his lead then if you are not party to this bleak.

For years is simple truth has been confirmed by the attitudes and behavior of the ordinary Soldier towards his officers. For years it was the case that since there were drawn from a socioeconomic class was vastly inferior to that other opposite, the rank-and-file took it for granted that their options new what they did and were the very real sense born to Lee, i.e. war, were born into that class from which traditionally the core of officers withdrawn. Even more porn, the opposite for gentlemen, that is say they possessed it effortless and uncontrived capacity the rate eating self-insurance, good manners and the courteous if per Colonel mean towards those of inferior station. However mistaken name may have been in individual cases, the rank-and-file or able lookup assessment is being of a superior cast, on the sheet, omnipotent, natural, preordained leaders, and more often than not, nine father figures ( page 234 (.

Since last for all of this heads changed. Officers are no longer recruited exclusively from the upper classes. Compared leaf do hour from landed Gentry or aristocratic families, and many not an even pretended to camp public school. The same token, the rank-and-file or better educated and more sophisticated than their forebears. At first blush this would seem all to the good, giving promise of at Piedmont democratization in the proper mission of arms, a trend that would 1 Day Pl. it on par with most other locations in the civilized society.

Enforcement, according to some Simon rated as pieces, something quite other is happening. Confronted with the necessity recruiting its opposition to section a society would've been unthinkable in years gone by, the military is made what it regards as the best other

223

Bad job by insisting debt, since officers must still be gentlemen, we're no natural gulf exists between those who lead and those who followed this must be artificially inculcated by training.

2004 EDITOR: snobbery must be preserved at all costs!

The following accept from ravens horrible should make the matter plain. We start with a glimpse of life at the Royal military Academy, and later to school of them to treat war Mr., in the 1950s. According to Raven, the products of this training regimen may be his bizarre as those depicted in the four character studies which conclude this section.

... The saluting its Sandhurst is tremendous. The walk around Sandhurst looking remotely as if you might be an officer, you'll receive an excess and barrage of compliments buried the money boy in PT short. Running, square Soldiers and snap disguising attraction light nice. The elegant young gentlemen in the brown pearl be will lift it from his head with a control juror, true place it in an exact number of seconds later at precisely the same angle. Boys in uniform mistakes, sorts, a rifles for submersion guns will perform a volume of intricate movements, a loan or as a body, for your special benefit. 10

To detach observer be squeaked antics may seem ludicrous, boring or even things embarrassing. However, there will be others so emotionally incapable of distinguishing between compliments paid to the attractions of ranking commission and those paid to themselves as people that they will actually enjoy these two stipulations. But such enjoyment of these mandatory conventions, based upon a highly motivated if understandable misinterpretation of their meeting, many, like effects of even the most transparent flattery, provoke fully unrealistic feelings of self importance.

Other significant features as Sandhurst milieu, according to Raven, are: the pretax system, were cadets of high rank or record to discipline and report upon those of lower status; the mind blunting rules square upon which three. Essentials for career violence -- unthinking obedience, in exquisite capacity for keeping in step and a proper concern for the menu show dressed -- are instilled per hour upon our " until fatigue is wet hangover the mass cadets like Princeton Redstone over Sodom,; and finally the total awesome privacy, and lack of leisure for the following an idiosyncratic interest and pastimes. Taken together, these features of the Royal military Academy

224

Are designed to " build character " any new future officers with values proper to their calling.

2004 EDITOR: to brainwash the young so they are subservient to status quo

Any gaps which Sanders might have Latin leave in a total program for the in quotation of officer like qualities are at nearly failed, says Raven, but cause a moral imperatives of war Mr. These cluster round the concept of " that's ", enthusiasm, humor, sociability in responsibility -- traits which every optimum's opposition show.

Well much of the training was inevitably designed to promote physical fitness, there is nevertheless a strongly help lead announcer, what if it or not, should always have so much in the way up) or " that's " proxies that he would never admit to physical inadequacy until he dropped debtor and conscious. This believe, a very significant one, was mystical both in his nature and intensity. During a crippling exercise attended the course two or 3 oz. For a lot of sellout complaining of blisters are other mild into his dispositions. A the teeth instructor, himself a symbolize and self-indulgent man, denounced him in round terms. Announcer he said simply, could not and did not fall out. Willpower, nothing else, should keep in going forever. It was all a matter of " that's ". There was an unspoken implication that " since other rights could indicate fall out, even though they were often physically tougher, the officer blind to superior cast. I found in accepted believe among officers later on the date could perform physical feats are endured physical discomfort without it being in the least necessary for them to train or prepare for such things in the manner required of the private Soldier. Officers for example, it just did not do PT dated 98; they were officers and what endured to the very and, and they stepped right straight onto the field from the Senatorial or probable.

How much, in the last resort, was sought to depend on superior qualities morality and character! The military arts were given precise attention, but it was catch words with cause a moral implications ( cool dots " print, " commonsense " ( that filled the air as the course one on. Another Warminster virtue was attitude peculiar brand a few of humor. This is not the ability to see oneself and one's activities in a detached an ironical spirit -- that would been fatal. Humor means being carefulof unpleasant circumstances, rallying the man spirits by laughing with

215

Them over some slapstick incident, substance admitting " like a good sport will to an unjust punishment given to oneself by the adjutant and " laughing about it after words in the Manas ". This conception of humor ( and obvious branch of cool dots " ( was in fact is greatly designed to counteract are totally extinguish any tendencies towards an objective ( or intellectual ( humor that might contain changes of satire or cynicism --for such as saying what a been detrimental to another highly prized virtue, that of enthusiasm. [2004 EDITOR: you have to be able to eat shit and laugh about it like a good little codependent to the status quo]

About enthusiasm I can hardly trust myself to speak. It seemed to mean a sort of blind, uncritical application and to any to ask, however silly or futile, the De Niro assists or panic of a superior might suddenly thrust upon one. Since one of the points of enthusiasm was that you started doing whatever it was straightaway and without wasting time on questions, enthusiasm could involve a frantic expense of time and energy on some trifling project, Lisa Foley because uncritically undertaking, abandoned halfway as irrationally as it was commands. This, of course, was just what great Soldiers of the past wish to avoid when they deplore the indiscriminate use of will zeal ". Why is seal -- condemned alike by von Clausewitz and Wellington -- should now once again be found desirable it is interesting to speculate. I suspect it is because the superior and analytical attitude is considered on Democratic; and that the influences such people as Lord Montgomery has dictated a spirit, for junior officers lease, I'll " mocking and," getting on with the job will. The hardiness, not to say hysteria, implied by such expressions was of course distasteful to the most fastidious and skeptical officers, permit benefit yet another virtue, that of loyalty, had to be invoked. Loyalty meant you were acquired, in the name of the queen and honor the regiment, to conceal any impatience or amusement you might feel when the demands on your enthusiasm became operatic, for seal what is playing in possible fulfillment. Loyalty, in fact, was a concession often blatantly used to blackmail you into silence wh